Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T05:30:55.010Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

In the Labyrinth of the Library: Petrarch’s Cicero, Dante’s Virgil, and the Historiography of the Renaissance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Martin Eisner
Martin Eisner*
Affiliation:
Duke University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Petrarch’s 1345 discovery of Cicero’s personal letters in Verona has long been regarded as a foundational moment in the historiography of the Renaissance. In the traditional view, Petrarch’s discovery engenders a new historical self-consciousness that has frequently been described, since the middle of the twentieth century, in terms of a contrast between a medieval Dante and a Renaissance Petrarch. In keeping with recent work rethinking periodization, this essay revisits Petrarch’s letters on his discovery to reconsider the distance between Dante and Petrarch and to reveal how Petrarch constructs his new relationship with Cicero through Dante’s characterization of Virgil. While some critics have noted this Dantean presence, they have not examined its meaning. This study argues that Petrarch’s borrowing from Dante is significant because it shows how Dante’s complex relationship to the past embodied in the figure of Virgil shaped Petrarch’s construction of his Cicero and informed Renaissance ideas of history.

Type
Research Article
Information
Renaissance Quarterly , Volume 67 , Issue 3 , Fall 2014 , pp. 755 - 790
Copyright
Copyright © Renaissance Society of America 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agamben, Giorgio. “What is a Paradigm?” http://www.egs.edu/faculty/giorgio-agamben/articles/what-is-a-paradigm/. 2002.Google Scholar
Alessio, Gian Carlo. “La ‘Comedìa’ nel margine dei classici.” In Studi di filologia medievale offerti a D'Arco Silvio Avalle, 3–25. Milan, 1996.Google Scholar
Antognini, Roberta. Il progetto autobiografico delle Familiares di Petrarca. Milan, 2008.Google Scholar
Ascoli, Albert Russell. Dante and the Making of a Modern Author. Cambridge, 2008.10.1017/CBO9780511485718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ascoli, Albert Russell. “Blinding the Cyclops: Petrarch after Dante.” In Petrarch and Dante (2009), 114–73.Google Scholar
Ascoli, Albert Russell. A Local Habitation and a Name: Imagining Histories in the Italian Renaissance. New York, 2011.10.5422/fordham/9780823234288.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auerbach, Erich. Scenes from the Drama of European Literature. 1959. Reprint, Minneapolis, 1984.Google Scholar
Augustine, . De Symbolo Ad Catechumenos Sermo Alius. In vol. 40 of Patrologia Latina, ed. Migne, J. P., 627–68. Paris, 1845.Google Scholar
Augustine, . De Doctrina Christiana. Trans. Green, R. P. H.. Oxford, 1995.Google Scholar
Augustine, . Confessions. Trans. Chadwick, Henry. New York, 1998.Google Scholar
Baglio, Marco. “Presenze dantesche nel Petrarca latino.” Studi petracheschi 9 (1992): 77–136.Google Scholar
Baranski, Zygmunt G. “The Ethics of Ignorance: Petrarch’s Epicurus and Averroës and the Structures of De Sui Ipsius et Multorum Ignorantia. ” Proceedings of the British Academy 146 (2007): 39–59.Google Scholar
Barkan, Leonard. Unearthing the Past: Archaeology and Aesthetics in the Making of Renaissance Culture. New Haven, 1999.Google Scholar
Barolini, Teodolinda. Dante’s Poets: Textuality and Truth in the Comedy. Princeton, 1984.10.1515/9781400853212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barolini, Teodolinda. “The Making of a Lyric Sequence: Time and Narrative in Petrarch’s Rerum vulgarium fragmenta .” In Dante and the Origins of Italian Literary Culture, 193–223. New York, 2006.10.5422/fordham/9780823227037.003.0011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barolini, Teodolinda. “‘Only Historicize’: History, Material Culture, and the Future of Dante Studies.” Dante Studies 127 (2009a): 37–54.Google Scholar
Barolini, Teodolinda. “Petrarch as the Metaphysical Poet Who Is Not Dante: Metaphysical Markers at the Beginning of the Rerum vulgarium fragmenta (Rvf 1–21).” In Petrarch and Dante (2009b), 195–225.Google Scholar
Barolini, Teodolinda. “The Self in the Labyrinth of Time: Rerum vulgarium fragmenta.” In Petrarch: A Critical Guide to the Complete Works (2009c), 33–62.Google Scholar
Baron, Hans. “Moot Problems of Renaissance Interpretation: An Answer to Wallace K. Ferguson.” Journal of the History of Ideas 19.1 (1958): 26–34.10.2307/2707950CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron, Hans. The Crisis of the Early Italian Renaissance: Civic Humanism and Republican Liberty in an Age of Classicism and Tyranny. Princeton, 1966.Google Scholar
Bernardo, Aldo S. Petrarch, Scipio and the “Africa”: The Birth of Humanism’s Dream. Baltimore, 1962.Google Scholar
Bernardo, Aldo S. Petrarch, Laura, and the Triumphs. Albany, 1974.Google Scholar
Biblioteca Medicea Laurenziana, Florence, Plut. 26 sin. 10.Google Scholar
Biddick, Kathleen. The Typological Imaginary: Circumcision, Technology, History. Philadelphia, 2003.10.9783/9780812201277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Billanovich, Giuseppe. Petrarca letterato I: Lo scrittoio del Petrarca. 2nd ed. Rome, 1947.Google Scholar
Billanovich, Giuseppe. “Petrarch and the Textual Tradition of Livy.” Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 14.3/4 (1951): 137–208.10.2307/750338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Billanovich, Giuseppe. “Petrarca e il Ventoso.” Italia medioevale e umanistica 9 (1966): 389–401.Google Scholar
Billanovich, Giuseppe. “Quattro libri del Petrarca e Verona.” Studi petracheschi 7 (1990): 233–62.Google Scholar
Billanovich, Giuseppe. “Petrarca e Cicerone.” In Petrarca e il primo Umanesimo, 97–116. Padua, 1996.Google Scholar
Billanovich, Giuseppe. “Petrarca e i libri della cattedrale di Verona.” In Petrarca, Verona, e l’Europa: Atti del convegno internazionale di studi, ed. Giuseppe Billanovich and Giuseppe Frasso, 117–78. Padua, 1997.Google Scholar
Black, Robert. “The Donation of Constantine: A New Source for the Concept of the Renaissance?” In Language and Images of Renaissance Italy, ed. Brown, Alison, 51–85. Oxford, 1995.Google Scholar
Bloom, Harold. The Anxiety of Influence: A Theory of Poetry. Oxford, 1973.Google Scholar
Blumenberg, Hans. “Light as a Metaphor for Truth: At the Preliminary Stage of Philosophical Concept Formation.” In Modernity and the Hegemony of Vision, ed. Levin, David Michael, 30–62. Berkeley, 1993.Google Scholar
Boccaccio, Giovanni. Epistole. In vol. 5 of Tutte le opere di Giovanni Boccaccio. ed. Ginetta Auzzas, 493–878. Milan, 1992.Google Scholar
Boccaccio, Giovanni. Vita di Petrarca. Ed. Gianni Villani. Rome, 2004.Google Scholar
Bosco, Umberto. “Né dolcezza di figlio.” In Dante vicino, 173–96. Rome, 1976.Google Scholar
Brownlee, Kevin. “Power Plays: Petrarch’s Genealogical Strategies.” Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies 35 (2005): 467–88.10.1215/10829636-35-3-467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruni, Leonardo. “The Lives of Dante and Petrarch.” In The Humanism of Leonardo Bruni: Selected Texts, ed. Nagel, Alan F, 85–100. Binghamton, 1987.Google Scholar
Burckhardt, Jacob. The Civilization of the Renaissance in Italy. Trans. Peter Murray. New York, 1990.Google Scholar
Burke, Peter. The Renaissance Sense of the Past. London, 1969.Google Scholar
Burrow, John A. The Ages of Man: A Study in Medieval Writing and Thought. Oxford, 1988.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198117551.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burrow, John W. A History of Histories: Epics, Chronicles, Romances and Inquiries from Herodotus to the Twentieth Century. New York, 2007.Google Scholar
The Cambridge Companion to Renaissance Humanism. Ed. Jill Kraye. Cambridge, 1996.Google Scholar
Capodivacca, Angela Matilde. “Nietzche’s Zukunftsphilologie: Leopardi, Philology, History.” California Italian Studies Journal 2.1 (2011). http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/2528k6vm.Google Scholar
Carrara, Enrico. “Le Antiquis Illustrioribus.” In Studi petrarcheschi ed altri scritti, 137–79. Turin, 1959.Google Scholar
Carruthers, Mary. The Book of Memory: A Study of Memory in Medieval Culture. Cambridge, 1990.Google Scholar
Celenza, Christopher S. The Lost Italian Renaissance: Humanists, Historians, and Latin’s Legacy. Baltimore, 2004.Google Scholar
Charity, A. C. Events and Their Afterlife: The Dialectics of Christian Typology in the Bible and Dante. Cambridge, 1966.Google Scholar
Chenu, M.-D. “Theology and the New Awareness of History.” In Nature, Man, and Society in the Twelfth Century, ed. Jerome Taylor and Lester K. Little, 162–201. Toronto, 1997.Google Scholar
Cicero, Marcus Tullius. De finibus bonorum et malorum. Ed. H. Rackham. Cambridge, 1914.Google Scholar
Cicero, Marcus Tullius. Letters to Quintus and Brutus; Letter to Octavian; Invectives; Handbook of Electioneering. Ed. and trans. D. R. Shackleton Bailey. Cambridge, MA, 2002.Google Scholar
Comparetti, Domenico. Vergil in the Middle Ages. Princeton, 1997.Google Scholar
Constable, Giles. Letters and Letter-Collections. Turnhout, 1976.Google Scholar
Cook, Albert S. “Miscellaneous: Dante Purgatorio 22.67–69.” Romanic Review 8 (1917): 463.Google Scholar
Cosenza, Mario Emilio, ed. Petrarch’s Letters to Classical Authors. Chicago, 1910.Google Scholar
Dante, . The Divine Comedy. Ed. and trans. Robert M. Durling. 3 vols. Oxford, 1996–2011.Google Scholar
Davis, Charles Till. Dante’s Italy and Other Essays. Philadelphia, 1984.Google Scholar
Davis, Kathleen. Periodization and Sovereignty: How Ideas of Feudalism and Secularization Govern the Politics of Time. Philadelphia, 2008.10.9783/9780812207415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Grazia, Margreta. “The Modern Divide: From Either Side.” Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies 37.3 (2007): 453–87.10.1215/10829636-2007-008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Grazia, Margreta. “Anachronism.” In Cultural Reformations: Medieval and Renaissance in Literary History, ed. Brian Cummings and James Simpson, 13–32. Oxford 2010.Google Scholar
DellaNeva, JoAnn ed. Ciceronian Controversies. Cambridge, MA, 2007.Google Scholar
Dempsey, Charles. “Response: ‘Historia’ and Anachronism in Renaissance Art.” The Art Bulletin 87.3 (2005): 416–21.10.1080/00043079.2005.10786250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durling, Robert M. “The Ascent of Mt. Ventoux and the Crisis of Allegory.” Italian Quarterly 18 (1974): 7–28.Google Scholar
Eden, Kathy. “Petrarchan Hermeneutics and the Rediscovery of Intimacy.” In Petrarch and the Textual Origins of Interpretation, ed. Teodolinda Barolini and H. Wayne Storey, 231–44. Leiden, 2007.10.1163/ej.9789004163225.i-268.28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feo, Michele. “Francesco Petrarca.” In Enciclopedia Virgiliana, 53–78. Rome, 1984–.Google Scholar
Feo, Michele ed. Codici latini del Petrarca nelle biblioteche fiorentine: mostra 19 maggio–30 giugno 1991. Florence, 1991.Google Scholar
Feo, Michele. “Petrarca e Cicerone.” In Cicerone nella tradizione europea: Dalla tarda antichità al Settecento, Atti del VI Symposium Ciceronianum Arpinas (Arpino 6 maggio 2005), ed. Emanuele Narducci, 17–50. Florence, 2006.Google Scholar
Fera, Vincenzo. “La filologia del Petrarca e i fondamenti della filologia umanistica.” In Il Petrarca latino e le origini dell’umanesimo, 367–91. Florence, 1996.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Wallace K. The Renaissance in Historical Thought: Five Centuries of Interpretation. Boston, 1948.Google Scholar
Findlen, Paula ed. The Italian Renaissance: The Essential Readings. Malden, 2002.Google Scholar
Flavio, Biondo. Italia Illustrata: Text, Translation, and Commentary. Ed. Catherine J. Castner. vols. Binghamton, 2005.Google Scholar
Folena, Gianfranco. “L’orologio di Petrarca.” Libri e documenti 5 (1979): 1–12.Google Scholar
Foresti, Arnaldo. Aneddoti della vita di Francesco Petrarca. Ed. Antonia Tissoni Benvenuti. Padua, 1977.Google Scholar
Freccero, John. “Allegory and Autobiography.” In The Cambridge Companion to Dante, ed. Rachel Jacoff, 161–80. Cambridge, 1992.Google Scholar
Galligan, Francesca. “Poets and Heroes in Petrarch’s Africa .” In Petrarch in Britain: Interpreters, Imitators, and Translators over 700 Years, ed. Martin McLaughlin, Letizia Panizza, and Peter Hainsworth, 85–93. Oxford, 2007.Google Scholar
Garin, Eugenio. Italian Humanism: Philosophy and Civic Life in the Renaissance. New York, 1965.Google Scholar
Garin, Eugenio. “Dante nel Rinascimento.” Rinascimento, n.s., 7 (1967): 3–28.Google Scholar
Gilson, Etienne. “Notes sur une frontière contestée… III. In confinio duorum populorum.” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire au Moyen Age 33 (1958): 81–88.Google Scholar
Gombrich, E. H. “The Renaissance: Period or Movement?” In Background to the English Renaissance: Introductory Lectures, ed. J. B. Trapp, 9–30. London, 1974.Google Scholar
Gordan, Phyllis Walter Goodhart trans. Two Renaissance Book Hunters: The Letters of Poggius Bracciolini to Nicolaus de Niccolis. New York, 1974.Google Scholar
Gouwens, Kenneth. “Perceiving the Past: Renaissance Humanism after the ‘Cognitive Turn.’” The American Historical Review 103.1 (1998): 55–82.10.2307/2650775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grafton, Anthony. “Renaissance Readers and Ancient Texts: Comments on Some Commentaries.” Renaissance Quarterly 38.4 (1985): 615–49.10.2307/2861952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grafton, Anthony. Forgers and Critics: Creativity and Duplicity in Western Scholarship. Princeton, 1990.Google Scholar
Greenblatt, Stephen. The Swerve: How the World Became Modern. New York, 2011.Google Scholar
Greene, Thomas M. The Light in Troy: Imitation and Discovery in Renaissance Poetry. New Haven, 1982.Google Scholar
Hankins, James. “The ‘Baron Thesis’ after Forty Years and Some Recent Studies of Leonardo Bruni.” Journal of the History of Ideas 56.2 (1995): 309–38.10.2307/2709840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hankins, James, ed. Renaissance Civic Humanism: Reappraisals and Reflections. Cambridge, 2000.Google Scholar
Haskins, Charles Homer. The Renaissance of the Twelfth Century. 1927. Reprint, Cambridge, 1971.Google Scholar
Hinds, Stephen. “Petrarch, Cicero, Virgil: Virtual Community in Familiares 24, 4.” Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici 52 (2004): 157–75.10.2307/40236450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinds, Stephen. “Defamliarizing Latin Literature, from Petrarch to Pulp Fiction.” Transactions of the American Philological Association 135.1 (2005): 49–81.10.1353/apa.2005.0008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houghton, Luke. “ Veteris vestigia flammae?: The Rebirths of Antiquity.” In Renaissance? Perceptions of Continuity and Discontinuity in Europe, c. 1300–c. 1550, ed. Alexander Lee, Pit Péporté, and Harry Schnitker, 17–26. Leiden, 2010.Google Scholar
Iannucci, Amilcare A. “Dante’s Limbo: At the Margins of Orthodoxy.” In Dante and the Unorthodox: The Aethetics of Transgression, ed. James Miller, 63–82. Waterloo, Ontario, 2005.Google Scholar
Ianziti, Gary. “From Praise to Prose: Leonardo Bruni’s Lives of the Poets.” I Tatti Studies: Essays in the Renaissance 10 (2005): 127–48.Google Scholar
Jacoff, Rachel, and Jeffrey, T. Schnapp, eds. The Poetry of Allusion: Virgil and Ovid in Dante’s Commedia. Stanford, 1991.Google Scholar
Jameson, Frederic. Postmodernism, or, the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. Durham, 1991.Google Scholar
Jauss, Hans Robert. “Modernity and Literary Tradition.” Critical Inquiry 31.2 (2005): 329–64.10.1086/430964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelley, Donald R. Renaissance Humanism. Boston, 1991.Google Scholar
Kelley, Donald R. “Ideas of Periodization in the West.” In The Many Faces of Clio: Cross-Cultural Approaches to Historiography, ed. Q. Edward Wang and Franz L. Fillafer, 17–27. New York, 2006.Google Scholar
Kinney, Arthur F. “Continental Poetics.” In A Companion to Rhetoric and Rhetorical Criticism, ed. Walter Jost and Wendy Olmsted, 80–95. Malden, 2004.Google Scholar
Kristeller, Paul Oskar. Eight Philosophers of the Italian Renaissance. Stanford, 1978.Google Scholar
Kristeller, Paul Oskar. “Humanism and Scholasticism in the Italian Renaissance [1944].” In Renaissance Thought and Its Sources, 85–105. New York, 1979.Google Scholar
Latini, Brunetto. Il Tesoretto (The Little Treasure). Trans. Julia Bolton Holloway. New York, 1981.Google Scholar
Laureys, Marc. “Quintilian’s Judgement of Seneca and the Scope and Purpose of Inst.,10, 1.” Antike und Abendland 37 (1991): 100–25.Google Scholar
Le Goff, Jacques. “Documento/monumento.” In Enciclopedia Einaudi, ed. Ruggiero Romano, 38–48. Turin, 1978.Google Scholar
Lokaj, Rodney J., ed. Petrarch’s Ascent of Mount Ventoux: The Familiaris IV.1. Rome, 2006.Google Scholar
Lorch, Maristella. “Petrarch, Cicero, and the Classical Pagan Tradition.” In Renaissance Humanism: Foundations, Forms, and Legacy, ed. Albert Rabil Jr., 71–94. Philadelphia, 1988.Google Scholar
Mann, Nicholas. “The Origins of Humanism.” In The Cambridge Companion to Renaissance Humanism (1996), 1–19.10.1017/CCOL0521430380.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinez, Ronald L. “Dante and the Two Canons: Statius in Virgil’s Footsteps (Purgatorio 21–30).” Comparative Literature Studies 32.2 (1995): 151–75.Google Scholar
Martinez, Ronald L. “Petrarch’s Lame Leg and the Corpus of Cicero: An Early Crisis of Humanism?” In The Body in Early Modern Italy, ed. Julia L. Harrison and Walter Stephens, 42–58. Baltimore, 2010.Google Scholar
Mazzocco, Angelo. “Petrarch: Founder of Renaissance Humanism?” In Interpretations of Renaissance Humanism, ed. Angelo Mazzocco, 215–42. Leiden, 2006.Google Scholar
Mazzotta, Giuseppe. The Worlds of Petrarch. Durham, 1993.10.1215/9780822382614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazzotta, Giuseppe. “Petrarch’s Epistolary Epic: Letters on Familiar Matters (Rerum familiarum libri).” In Petrarch: A Critical Guide to the Complete Works (2009), 309–20.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, Martin L. “Humanist Concepts of Renaissance and Middle Ages in the Tre- and Quattrocento.” Renaissance Studies 2.2 (1988): 131–42.10.1111/j.1477-4658.1988.tb00142.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaughlin, Martin L. Literary Imitation in the Italian Renaissance. Oxford, 1995.Google Scholar
Menocal, Maria Rosa. Shards of Love: Exile and the Origins of the Lyric. Durham, 1994.10.1215/9780822381853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merton, Robert K.. On the Shoulders of Giants: A Shandean Postscript. 1965. Reprint, Chicago, 1993.Google Scholar
Minnis, Alastair J. Medieval Theory of Authorship: Scholastic Literary Attitudes in the Later Middle Ages. London, 1984.Google Scholar
Minnis, Alastair J. Fallible Authors: Chaucer’s Pardoner and Wife of Bath. Philadelphia, 2008.10.9783/9780812205718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moevs, Christian. The Metaphysics of Dante’s Comedy. New York, 2005.10.1093/0195174615.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Momigliano, Arnaldo. The Classical Foundations of Modern Historiography. Berkeley, 1990.Google Scholar
Mommsen, Theodor E. “Petrarch’s Conception of the ‘Dark Ages.’” Speculum 17 (1942): 226–42.10.2307/2856364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montano, Rocco. Dante e il rinascimento. Naples, 1942.Google Scholar
Morgan, Alison. Dante and the Medieval Other World. Cambridge, 1990.Google Scholar
Nagel, Alexander, and Wood, Christopher S.. Anachronic Renaissance. New York, 2010.Google Scholar
Najemy, John M. Between Friends: Discourses of Power and Desire in the Machiavelli-Vettori Letters of 1513–1515. Princeton, 1993.Google Scholar
Nederman, Cary J. “The Union of Wisdom and Eloquence before the Renaissance: The Ciceronian Orator in Medieval Thought.” Journal of Medieval History 18.1 (1992): 75–95.10.1016/0304-4181(92)90017-SCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noble, Thomas F. X. Western Civilization: Beyond Boundaries. 5th ed. Boston, 2008.Google Scholar
Pierre de, Nolhac. Petrarque et L’humanisme. 2 vols. Paris, 1907.Google Scholar
Ohly, Friedrich. Sensus Spiritualis: Studies in Medieval Significs and the Philology of Culture. Chicago, 2005.Google Scholar
Panofsky, Erwin. Renaissance and Renascences in Western Art. New York, 1979.Google Scholar
Pasquini, Emilio. “Dantismo petrarchesco: Ancora su Fam. XXI 15 e dintorni.” In Motivi e forme delle Familiari di Francesco Petrarca, ed. Claudia Berra, 21–38. Milan, 2003.Google Scholar
Petrarch: A Critical Guide to the Complete Works. Ed. Kirkham, Victoria and Maggi, Armando. Chicago, 2009.10.7208/chicago/9780226437439.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrarch and Dante: Anti-Dantism, Metaphysics, Tradition. Ed. Baranski, Zygmunt G. and Cachey, Theodore J.. Notre Dame, 2009.Google Scholar
Petrarch, Francesco. L’Africa. Ed. Nicola Festa. Florence, 1962.Google Scholar
Petrarch, Francesco. Rerum memorandum libri. Ed. Giuseppe Billanovich. Florence, 1934.Google Scholar
Petrarch, Francesco. Letters on Familiar Matters: Rerum familiarium libri I–XXIV. Trans. Aldo S. Bernardo. 3 vols. Baltimore, 1975–85.Google Scholar
Petrarch, Francesco. Petrarch's Lyric Poems: The Rime Sparse and Other Lyrics. Trans. Robert M. Durling. Cambridge, 1976.Google Scholar
Petrarch, Francesco. De vita solitaria. Buch I. Ed. K. A. E. Enenkel. Leiden, 1990.Google Scholar
Petrarch, Francesco. Letters of Old Age = Rerum senilium libri I–XVIII. Trans. Aldo S. Bernardo, Reta A. Bernardo, and Saul Levin. 2 vols. Baltimore, 1992.Google Scholar
Petrarch, Francesco. Lettere disperse. Ed. Alessandro Pancheri. Parma, 1994.Google Scholar
Petrarch, Francesco. On Religious Leisure (De otio religioso). Trans. Susan S. Schearer. New York, 2002.10.2307/j.ctt1t88tj4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrarch, Francesco. Invectives. Ed. and trans. David Marsh. Cambridge, 2003.Google Scholar
Petrarch, Francesco. Le familiari = Familiarium rerum libri. Trans. Ugo Dotti. Ed. Umberto Bosco and Vittorio Rossi. 5 vols. Racconigi, 2004–09.Google Scholar
Petrarch, Francesco. Le postille del Virgilio Ambrosiano. Ed. Marco Baglio, Antonietta Nebuloni Testa, and Marco Petoletti. 2 vols. Rome, 2006.Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, Rudolf. History of Classical Scholarship: From 1300 to 1850. Oxford, 1976.Google Scholar
Porter, James I. Nietzsche and the Philology of the Future. Stanford, 2000.Google Scholar
Pulsoni, Carlo. “Il Dante di Francesco Petrarca: Vaticano Latino 3199.” Studi petrarcheschi 10 (1993): 155–208.Google Scholar
Quillen, Carol E. Rereading the Renaissance: Petrarch, Augustine, and the Language of Humanism. Ann Arbor, 1998.10.3998/mpub.15299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quint, David. “Humanism and Modernity: A Reconsideration of Bruni’s Dialogues.” Renaissance Quarterly 38.3 (1985): 423–45.10.2307/2861078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeve, Michae D. “The Rediscovery of Classical Texts in the Renaissance.” In Itinerari dei testi antichi, ed. Oronzo Pecere, 115–57. Rome, 1991.Google Scholar
Reeve, Michae D. “Classical Scholarship.” In The Cambridge Companion to Renaissance Humanism (1996), 20–46.10.1017/CCOL0521430380.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regn, Gerhard. “Negotiating Religion and Art: Wagner, Petrarch, Dante.” MLN 126 (2011): S77–S88.10.1353/mln.2011.0061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regn, Gerhard, and Huss, Bernhard. “Petrarch’s Rome: The History of the Africa and the Renaissance Project.” MLN 124.1 (2009): 86–102.10.1353/mln.0.0086CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renaudet, Augustin. Dante, humaniste. Paris, 1952.10.3406/bude.1952.5012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, L. D., and Wilson, N. G.. Scribes and Scholars: A Guide to the Transmission of Greek and Latin Literature. 3rd ed. Oxford, 1991.Google Scholar
Rico, Francisco. “Philology and Philosophy in Petrarch.” In Intellectuals and Writers in Fourteenth-Century Europe, ed. Piero Boitani and Anna Torti, 45–66. Cambridge, 1986.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton, 1979.Google Scholar
Rossi, Vittorio. “Un paragone dantesco e petrarchesco [1904].” In Scritti di critica letteraria, 109–16. Florence, 1930.Google Scholar
Rossi, Vittorio. “Sulla formazione delle raccolte epistolari petrarchesche.” Annali della cattedra petrarchescha 3 (1932): 55–73.Google Scholar
Rotondi, G. “Note sulle Familiari del Petrarca.” Istituto lombardo di scienze e lettere: Rendiconti: Classe di lettere scienze storiche e morali 76 (1942–43): 114–32.Google Scholar
Sandys, John Edwin. A History of Classical Scholarship. 2 vols. Cambridge, 1908.Google Scholar
Schiffman, Zachary Sayre. The Birth of the Past. Baltimore, 2011.Google Scholar
Seneca, . Ad Lucilium epistulae morales. Trans. Richard M. Gummere. 3 vols. London, 1925.Google Scholar
Seneca, . Declamations. Trans. Michael Winterbottom. 2 vols. Cambridge, MA, 1974.Google Scholar
Simone, Franco. “La Coscienza della Rinascita negli Umanisti.” La Rinascita 2 and 3 (1939 and 1940): 838–71 and 163–86.Google Scholar
Simpson, James. “Subjects of Triumph and Literary History: Dido and Petrarch in Petrarch’s Africa and Trionfi .” Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies 35.3 (2005): 489–508.10.1215/10829636-35-3-489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. The Foundations of Modern Political Thought. 2 vols. Cambridge, 1978.Google Scholar
Solerti, Angelo. Le Vite di Dante, Petrarca e Boccaccio scritte fino al secolo decimosesto. Milan, n.d. [1904].Google Scholar
Spitzer, Leo. “The Problem of Latin Renaissance Poetry.” Studies in the Renaissance 2 (1955): 118–38.10.2307/2856963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starn, Randolph. “Who’s Afraid of the Renaissance?” In The Past and Future of Medieval Studies, ed. John Van Engen, 129–47. Notre Dame, 1994.Google Scholar
Statius, . Thebaid, Books 8–12 and Achilleid. Ed. and trans. D. R. Shackleton Bailey. Cambridge, MA, 2003.Google Scholar
Stierle, Karlheinz. “Translatio Studii and Renaissance: From Vertical to Horizontal Transmission.” In The Translatability of Cultures: Figurations of the Space Between, ed. Sanford Budick and Wolfgang Iser, 55–67. Stanford, 1996.Google Scholar
Struever, Nancy S. Theory as Practice: Ethical Inquiry in the Renaissance. Chicago, 1992.Google Scholar
Sturm-Maddox, Sara. “Dante, Petrarch, and the Laurel Crown.” In Petrarch and Dante (2009), 290–319.Google Scholar
Symonds, John Addington. The Revival of Learning. Vol. 2, Renaissance in Italy. London, 1877.Google Scholar
Timpanaro, Sebastian. The Genesis of Lachmann’s Method. Ed. and trans. Glenn W. Most. Chicago, 2005 Google Scholar
Ullman, B. L. “Renaissance: The Word and the Underlying Concept.” Studies in Philology 49.2 (1952): 105–18.Google Scholar
Usher, Jonathan. “Petrarch Reads Inferno 4.” Electronic Bulletin of the Dante Society of America (2000). http://www.princeton.edu/∼dante/ebdsa/usher2.htm.Google Scholar
Velli, Giuseppe. “Il Dante di Francesco Petrarca.” Studi petracheschi, n.s., 2 (1985): 185–99.Google Scholar
Vickers, Brian. “The Idea of the Renaissance, Revisited.” Yearbook of the Spanish and Portuguese Society for English Renaissance Studies 12 (2002): 69–95.Google Scholar
Virgil, . Eclogues, Georgics, Aeneid 1–6. Trans. H. Rushton Fairclough. London, 1916.Google Scholar
Virgil, . Aeneid 7–12, The Minor Poems. Trans. H. Rushton Fairclough. London, 1918.Google Scholar
Wallace, David. Chaucerian Polity: Absolutist Lineages and Associational Forms in England and Italy. Stanford, 1997.Google Scholar
Wallace, David, and Summit, Jennifer, eds. Medieval/Renaissance: After Periodization. Special issue, Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies 37 (2007).Google Scholar
Weiss, Roberto. The Renaissance Discovery of Classical Antiquity. 2nd ed. Oxford, 1988.Google Scholar
Wilkins, Ernest H. “Petrarch’s Coronation Oration.” PMLA 68.5 (1953): 1241–50.10.2307/460017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witt, Ronald G. “Medieval ‘Ars Dictaminis’ and the Beginnings of Humanism: A New Construction of the Problem.” Renaissance Quarterly 35.1 (1982): 1–35.10.2307/2861451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witt, Ronald G. In the Footsteps of the Ancients. Leiden, 2000.Google Scholar
Wojciehowski, Dolora A. Old Masters, New Subjects: Early Modern and Poststructuralist Theories of Will. Stanford, 1995.Google Scholar
Zak, Gur. Petrarch’s Humanism and the Care of the Self. Cambridge, 2010.10.1017/CBO9780511730337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziolkowski, Jan M., and Michael, C. J. Putnam, eds. The Virgilian Tradition: The First Fifteen Hundred Years. New Haven, 2008.Google Scholar