Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T23:52:22.877Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Hypnerotomachia Poliphili, Image, Text, and Vernacular Poetics*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Rosemary Trippe
Rosemary Trippe*
Affiliation:
Johns Hopkins University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Illustration and text in the Hypnerotomachia Poliphili (Venice, 1499) have been long considered intricately related yet the book's ornate, invented language has made study of such interaction difficult. This essay reconsiders their connections through a close analysis of two woodcuts and accompanying text in light of the poetical-rhetorical conventions of contemporary Petrarchan imitation in Italy. This reveals how Francesco Colonna visually and textually adapted, in a playful way, traditional subjects of vernacular lyric poetry: the beauty of the poet's beloved, and the lover's own emotions, characterized through metaphor and other tropes.

Type
Studies
Information
Renaissance Quarterly , Volume 55 , Issue 4 , Winter 2002 , pp. 1222 - 1258
Copyright
Copyright © Renaissance Society of America 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This article revises material presented at a seminar held in Florence (June, 1998) at the Villa Spelman, The Charles S. Singleton Center for Italian Studies of The Johns Hopkins University. I thank Elizabeth Cropper for suggesting that I publish this material and her constructive advice. In addition to the two anonymous readers of RQ, I also wish to thank the following for their reading of this work in various stages and their very helpful suggestions and comments: Elena Calvillo, Charles Dempsey, Frances Gage, Megan Holmes, and Walter S. Melion. Photographs of the Hypnerotomachia were acquired with funds from a Sadie and Louis Roth Fellowship. The 1980 critical edition of Giovanni Pozzi and Lucia A. Ciapponi is used throughout. All translations from the Hypnerotomachiaare my own, as are those from other Italian texts, except as otherwise noted. Though Joscelyn Godwin's translation is unabridged, in the text relevant for this article there are some substantive differences between his rendering of Colonna's text and mine. I have attempted to reproduce Colonna's structure, which occasionally contains incomplete periods and clauses. In their commentary, Pozzi and Ciapponi also note instances where clauses beginning in one sentence are completed in another, and I have followed their direction in my translations.

References

Agamben, Giorgio. 1982. “II sogno della lingua. Per una lettura del Poliphilo.” Lettere italiane 34:466-81.Google Scholar
Aldus Manutius and Renaissance Culture. 1998. Ed. David, Zeinberg. Florence.Google Scholar
Alonzo, Dámaso. 1961. “Petrarca e il petrarchismo.” Studi petrarcheschi 7:72–120.Google Scholar
Andrews, E.A. 1975. A Latin Dictionary, ed. Charlton T., Lewis and Charles, Short. Oxford.Google Scholar
Armstrong, Lillian. 2001. “Woodcuts for Liturgical Books Published by LucAntonio Giunta in Venice, 1499- 1501,” Word and Image 17:65–93.10.1080/02666286.2001.10435703Google Scholar
Avesani, Rino. 1962. “Intorno Francesco Colonna e Marco Antonio Ceresa.” Bibibthèque d'humanisme et renaissance 24:435-40.Google Scholar
Baxandall, Michael. 1971. Giotto and the Orators: Humanist Observers of Painting in Italy and the Discovery of Pictorial Composition. Oxford.Google Scholar
Bembo, Pietro. 1991. Gli Asolani. Ed. and comm. Giorgio, Dilemmi. Florence.Google Scholar
Berra, Claudia. 1996. La scrittura degli Asolani di Pietro Bembo. Florence.Google Scholar
Bolzoni, Lina. 1996. “Traparoleeimmagine: per una tipologia cinquecentesca del lettore creativo.” Lettere italiane 48:527-58.Google Scholar
Boyde, Patrick. 1971. Dante's Style in His Lyric Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Brown, Patricia Fortini. 1996. Venice and Antiquity: The Venetian Sense of the Past. Princeton.Google Scholar
Calvesi, Maurizio. 1984. “V. Hypnerotomachia e Petrarca.” In Studi in onore di Giulio Claudio Argan, ed. Silvana, Macchioni and Bianca Tavassi, La Greca. 3 vols. 1:137-45. Rome.Google Scholar
Calvesi, Maurizio. 1996. Ilpugno d'amore in sogno di Francesco Colonna romano. Rome.Google Scholar
Casella, Maria Teresa and Giovanni, Pozzi. 1959. Francesco Colonna biografia ed opere, 2 vols. Padua.Google Scholar
Castiglione, Baldassare. 1959. The Book of the Courtier. Trans. Singleton, Charles S.. Garden City, NY.Google Scholar
[Cicero, Marcus Tullius.] 1989. Rhetorica ad Herennium. Trans. Harry, Caplan. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Clough, Cecil. 1998. “Bembo's Edition of Petrarch and his Association with the Aldine Press.” In Aldus Manutius, 47- 80.Google Scholar
Colonna, Francesco. 1499. Hypnerotomachia Poliphili, ubi humana omnia non nisi somnium esse docet. Venice.Google Scholar
Colonna, Francesco. 1546. Hypnirotomachie, ou discourse du songe de Poliphile. Trans. Jean, Martin and Jacques, Gohorry, Paris.Google Scholar
Colonna, Francesco. 1883. Le songe de Poliphile, ou Hypnirotomachie de Frère Francesco Colonna. Trans., ed. Claude, Popelin. 2 vols. Paris.Google Scholar
Colonna, Francesco. 1980. Hypnerotomachia Poliphili. Ed. and comm. Lucia A., Ciapponi and Giovanni, Pozzi. 2 vols. 1968. Reprint, Padua.Google Scholar
Colonna, Francesco. 1998. Hypnerotomachia Poliphili. Trans., ed., and comm. Marco, Ariani and Mino, Gabriele. 2 vols. Milan.Google Scholar
Colonna, Francesco. 1999. Hypnerotomachia Poliphili. Trans. Joscelyn, Godwin. London. See also Casella and Pozzi.Google Scholar
Conte, Gian Biagio. 1986. The Rhetoric of Imitation: Genre and Poetic Memory in Virgil and Other Latin Poets. Trans., ed. Charles, Segal. Ithaca.Google Scholar
Cropper, Elizabeth. 1986. “On Beautiful Women, Parmigianino, Petrarchismo, and the Vernacular Style.” Art Bulletin 63:374-94.Google Scholar
Cropper, Elizabeth. 1986. “The Beauty of Women: Problems in the Rhetoric of Renaissance Portraiture.” In Rewriting the Renaissance: The Discoveries of Sexual Difference in Early Modern Europe, ed. Margaret, Furguson, Maureen, Quilligan and Nancy, Vickers, 175-90. Chicago.Google Scholar
Curtius, Ernst Robert. 1953. European Literature and the Latin Middle Ages. Trans. Willard R., Trask. New York.Google Scholar
D'Amico, John F. 1984. “The Progess of Renaissance Latin Prose: The Case of Apuleianism.” Renaissance Quarterly 37:351-92.Google Scholar
Dempsey, Charles. 1985. “Renaissance Hieroglyphic Studies and Gentile Bellini's Saint Mark Preaching in Alexandria.” In Hermeticism and the Renaissance, ed. Ingrid, Merkel and Allen, Debus, 343-65. Toronto.Google Scholar
Dempsey, Charles. 1992. The Portrayal of Love: Botticelli's Primavera and Humanist Culture at the Time of Lorenzo the Magnificent. Princeton.Google Scholar
Dionisotti, Carlo. 1968. Gli umanisti ed il volgare tra Quattrocento e Cinquecento. Florence.Google Scholar
Dionisotti, Carlo. 1974. “Fortuna del Petrarca nel Quattrocento.” Italia mediovale e umanistica 17:61–113.Google Scholar
Donati, Lamberto. 1950. “Studio esegetico sul Poliphilo.” La bibliofilia 52:128-62.Google Scholar
Donati, Lamberto. 1975. “Polifilo a Roma: le rovine romane.” La bibliofilia 77:37–64.Google Scholar
Ephrussi, Charles. 1888. E-tudesurlesongede Poliphile. Paris.Google Scholar
Farago, Claire J. 1992. Leonardo da Vinci's ParagoneM Critical Interpretation With a New Edition of the Text in the Codex Urbinas. Leiden.Google Scholar
Faral, Edmond. 1924. Les arts poetiques du Xii et du xii siècle. Paris.Google Scholar
Floriani, Piero. 1974. “Primo petrarchismo bembiano.” In Bembo e Castiglione: studisulclassicismo nel Cinquecento, 75– 98. Rome.Google Scholar
Folena, Giorgio. 1964. “Cultura cavalleresca e ‘umanesimo cavalleresco.'” In Umanesimo europeo, 141-58. Florence.Google Scholar
Forni, Pier Massimo. 1996. Adventures in Speech: Rhetoric and Narration in Boccaccio's Decameron. Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Fumagalli, Edoardo. 1984. “Francesco Colonna lettore d'Apuleio e il problema della datazione dell'’ Hypemotomachia Poliphili.” Italia medioevale e umanistica 27:233-66.Google Scholar
Fumagalli, Edoardo. 1992. “Due esemplari del Poliphilo.” Aevum 66:419-32.Google Scholar
Giehlow, Karl. 1915. “Die Hieroglyphenkunde des Humanismus in der Allegorie der Renaissance.” Jahrbuch der kunsthistorischen Sammlung des aherhöchsten Kaiserhauses 32:1-125.Google Scholar
Gombrich, Ernst. 1966. Norm and Form: Studies in the Art of the Renaissance. London.Google Scholar
Gnoli, Domenico. 1899. “II sogno di Poliphilo.” Rivista d'ltalia 11:44–72, 270-74.Google Scholar
Greene, Thomas. 1982. The Light in Troy: Imitation and Discovery in Renaissance Poetry. New Haven.Google Scholar
Grendler, Paul F. 1989. Schooling in Renaissance Italy: Literacy and Learning 1300-1600. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Griggs, Tamara. 1998. “Promoting the Past: the Hypnerotomachia Poliphili as Antiquarian Enterprise.” Word and Image 14:17–39.Google Scholar
Herceg, Giulio. 1961. “Struttura delle antitesi nel ‘Canzoniere’ petrarchesco.” Studi petrarcheschi 7:197–208.Google Scholar
Hieatt, A. Kent and Anne, Lake Prescott. 1992. “Contemporizing Antiquity: the Hypnerotomachia and Its Afterlife in France.” Word and Image 8:291–321.Google Scholar
Huper, Marie Sophie. 1956. “The Architectural Monuments of the Hypnerotomachia Poliphili,” Ph.D dissertation, University of Iowa.Google Scholar
Javitch, Daniel. 1985. “The Imitation of Imitations in Orlando Furioso.” Renaissance Quarterly 38:215-39.Google Scholar
Jossa, Stefano. l996. Lafantasiaelamemoria, intertestualita ariostesche. Naples.Google Scholar
Koch, Margarete. 1965. Die Ruckenfigur im Bild. Recklinghausen.Google Scholar
Lee, W Rensselaer. 1967. Ut pictura poesis: The Humanistic Theory of Painting. New York.Google Scholar
Lowry, Martin. 1979. The World of Aldus Manutius: Business and Scholarship in Renaissance Venice. Ithaca.Google Scholar
Mancini, Marco. 1989. “Intorno alia lingua del Poliphilo.” Roma nel rinascimento bibliografia e note. 6:29–48.Google Scholar
Marcus, Millicent Joy. 1979. An Allegory of Form: Literary Self-Consciousness in the Decameron. Saratoga, CA.Google Scholar
Mazzotta, Giuseppe. 1986. The World at Play in Boccaccio's Decameron. Princeton.Google Scholar
Mazzotta, Giuseppe. 1993. The Worlds of Petrarch. Durham, NC.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, Martin L. 1995. Literary Imitation in the Italian Renaissance. Oxford.Google Scholar
Medin, Antonio. 1904. “II culto del Petrarca nel Veneto.” Nuovo archivio veneto, n.s. 8:421-65.Google Scholar
Mitchell, W J.T. 1986. “Space and Time: Lessing's Laocoön,” in Iconology: Image, Text, Ideology, 95–115. Chicago.Google Scholar
Onians, John. 1988. Bearers of Meaning: The Classical Orders in Antiquity, the Middle Ages and the Renaissance. Princeton.Google Scholar
Oettinger, , April. 2000. “The Hypnerotomachia Poliphili: Text and Image in a Renaissance Romance.” Ph.D dissertation, University of Virginia.Google Scholar
Ovid, . 1984. Metamorphoses. Trans. Frank Justus, Miller. 2 vols. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Ovid, . 1986. Heroides andAmores. Trans. Grant, Showerman, rev. G.R, Goold. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Painter, George. 1963. The Hypnerotomachia Poliphili of 1499. London.Google Scholar
Pardo, Mary. 1989. “The Meaning of Savoldo's Magdalen.” Art Bulletin 71:67–91.Google Scholar
Pelosi, Olimpia. 1988. Ilsogno di Poliphilo: una qûete dell'umanesimo. Salerno.Google Scholar
Petrarch, Francesco. 1497. Sonetti, canzoni e trionfi. Comm. Bernardo, Illicino and Francesco, Filelfo. Venice.Google Scholar
Petrarch, Francesco. 1976. Petrarch's Lyric Poems. The Rime Sparse and Other Lyrics. Trans, and ed. Robert, Durling. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Piccolomini, EneaSilvio (Pope Pius II). 1972. Storia de due amanti e remedio d'amore. Trans. Maria, Luisa Doglio. Turin.Google Scholar
Pigman, G.W! 1980. “Imitation in the Renaissance.” Renaissance Quarterly 33:1–32.Google Scholar
Polizzi, Giles. 1987. “Le Songe de Poliphile. renovation ou metamorphose du genre littéraire.” In Le songe à la Renaissance, ed. Francoise, Charpentier, 85–95. Lyons.Google Scholar
Polizzi, Giles. 1998. “Le Poliphile ou l'lée du jardin: pour un analyze littéaire de l’ esthétique colonnienne.” Word and Image 14:61–81.Google Scholar
Pozzi, Giovanni. 1976. “Scienza antiquaria e letturatura: il Colonna.” In Storia della cultura veneta, ed. Girolamo, Arnaldi and Manlio Pastore, Stocchi. 6 vols. 3/ 1:477-98. Vicenza.Google Scholar
Pozzi, Giovanni. 1979. “II ritratto della donna nella poesia d'inizio Cinquecento e la pittura di Giorgione.” Lettere italiane 31:3–31.Google Scholar
Pozzi, Giovanni. 1981. “II ‘Polifilo’ nella storia del libro veneziano.” In Giorgione e I'umanesimo veneziano. ed. Rodolfo, Pallucchini. 2 vols. 1:71–107. Florence.Google Scholar
Pozzi, Giovanni. 1993. “Ancora il ‘Polifilo': l'autore, le vignette.” In Sull'orlo del parlare visible, 115-43. Milan.Google Scholar
Quintilian, . 1989. Institutio Oratoria. Trans. H.E., Butler. 4 vols. New York.Google Scholar
Raimondi, Ezio. 1964. “Umanesimo bolognese e umanesimo veneziano.” In Umanesimo europeo, 263-93. Florence.Google Scholar
Renier, Ridolfo. 1885. // tipo estetico della donna nel medioevo. Ancona.Google Scholar
Richardson, Brian. 1994. Print Culture in Renaissance Italy: The Editor and the Vernacular Text 1470-1600. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rossi, Antonio. 1980. Serafino Aquilano e la poesia cortigiana. Brescia.Google Scholar
Salemi, Joseph S. 1981. “Priapus by Pietro Bembo: An Annotated Translation.” Allegorica 5:81–94.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Dorothea. 1978. Untersuchen zu den Architekur-Ekphrasen in der Hypernotomachia Poliphili der Beschreibungdes Venus-tempeb. Frankfur.Google Scholar
Shearman, John. 1967. Mannerism. London.Google Scholar
Stewering, Roswitha. 1996. Architekur und Natur in der Hypnerotomachia Poliphili [Manutius 1499] und der Beschreibung des Werkes an Niccolò Lelio Cosmico. Minister.Google Scholar
Stichel, Dorothea. 1998. “Reading the Hypnerotomachia Poliphili in the Cinquecento: Marginal Notes in a Copy in Modena,” in Aldus Manutius, 217-36.Google Scholar
Summers, David. 1977. “Contrapposto: Style and Meaning in Renaissance Art.” Art Bulletin 59:336-91.Google Scholar
Summers, David. 1981. Michelangelo and the Language of Art. Princeton.Google Scholar
Szépe, Helena Katalin. 1991. “The Hypnerotomachia Poliphili and Other Aldines Considered in the Context of Decorated Books in Venice.” Ph.D dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Szépe, Helena Katalin. 1996. “Desire.in the Printed Dream of Poliphilo.” Art History 19:370-92.Google Scholar
Szépe, Helena Katalin. 1998. “Modes of Illuminating Aldines.” In Aldus Manutius, 185-200.Google Scholar
Umanesimo europeo e umanesimo veneziano. 1964. Ed. Vittore, Branca. Florence.Google Scholar
Wilk, Sarah. 1977. “The Sculpture of Tullio Lombardo: A Study of Sources and Meaning.” Ph.D dissertation, New York University.Google Scholar
Vickers, Nancy. 1981. “Diana Described: Scattered Reason and Scattered Rime.” Critical Inquiry 8:256-79.Google Scholar
Vickers, Nancy. 1982. “The Body Re-Membered: Petrarchan Lyric and Strategies of Description.” In Mimesis: From Mirror to Method, Augustine to Descartes, ed. John D., Lyons and Stephen G., Nichols, Jr., 100-09. Northampton, NH.Google Scholar