Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T05:33:15.415Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Francis Bacon and Ingenuity*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Rhodri Lewis
Rhodri Lewis*
Affiliation:
St. Hugh’s College, University of Oxford
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This essay discusses the Latin term ingenium within the writings of Francis Bacon (1561–1626). It proposes that although ingenium does not easily translate into English, Bacon uses the term in a clearly defined range of senses. For the most part, he echoes the discourse of ingenuity and inventiveness common to many sixteenth-century humanists, but differs from them in sharply delimiting the scope and status of ingenious thinking. In particular, he excludes ingenuity from the logical portion of his reformed art of discovery: as the goal of this was demonstrative knowledge, Bacon (like the Aristotelian logicians he aimed to supplant) believed that it had to be the province of the intellect, not of ingenium. A fuller understanding of the ways in which Bacon uses ingenium casts his methodological thought into illuminating new relief, and draws attention to the manner in which Bacon’s ideas were appropriated, criticized, and misunderstood in the half century after his death — not least by the self-styled Baconians in and around the early Royal Society.

Type
Research Article
Information
Renaissance Quarterly , Volume 67 , Issue 1 , Spring 2014 , pp. 113 - 163
Copyright
Copyright © Renaissance Society of America 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

In 2011, preliminary versions of this essay were presented to audiences at All Souls College, Oxford; the USC-Huntington Early Modern Studies Institute; the Warburg Institute; and the Maison Française d’Oxford. The comments and suggestions offered to me on each occasion were invaluable. Further, I am extremely grateful to Sorana Corneanu, Moti Feingold, Guido Giglioni, Nick Hardy, Alex Marr, Will Poole, Sarah Rivett, Liam Semler, Richard Serjeantson, Nigel Smith, Rowan Tomlinson, and Brian Vickers, all of whom commented on earlier drafts of my work, shared their research with me, or otherwise helped me to refine my arguments. I also learned a good deal from the observations of RQ’s anonymous readers. Where relevant volumes of the Oxford Francis Bacon have been published, I cite from them; where not, I cite from the formerly standard edition of Bacon’s Works by Spedding, Ellis, and Heath. Unless otherwise noted, all translations from languages other than English are my own.

References

Agrippa, Cornelius. De occulta philosophi. Ed. Vittoria Compagni, Perrone. Leiden, 1992.Google Scholar
Anstey, Peter. “Experimental versus Speculative Natural Philosophy.” In The Science of Nature in the Seventeenth Century, ed. Anstey, Peter and John A. Schuster, 215–42. Dordrecht, 2005.10.1007/1-4020-3703-1_9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aristotle, . Ethica Nicomache. Ed. Bywater, Ingram. Oxford, 1894.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . Ars rhetoric. Ed. Ross, W. D.. Oxford, 1959.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . Analytica priora et posterior. Ed. Ross, W. D. and Minio-Paluello, Lorenzo. Oxford, 1964.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . De arte poetica libe. Ed. Kassel, Rudolf. Oxford, 1965.Google Scholar
Ash, Eric H. Power, Knowledge, and Expertise in Elizabethan Englan. Baltimore, 2004.Google Scholar
Atti del convegno internazionale di studi su Bernardino Telesio. Ed. Accademia cosentina. Cosenza, 1990.Google Scholar
Francis, Bacon. The Works of Francis Bacon. Ed. James Spedding, Robert L. Ellis, and Douglas D. Heath. 7 vols. London, 1857–61.Google Scholar
Bacon, Francis. The Letters and Life of Francis Bacon. Ed. James Spedding. 7 vols. London, 1861–74.Google Scholar
Bacon, Francis. Novum organu. Ed. Fowler, Thomas. Oxford, 1889.Google Scholar
Bacon, Francis. Novum organu. Ed. and trans. Gibson, John and Urbach, Peter. Chicago, 1994.Google Scholar
Francis, Bacon. The Oxford Francis Bacon. Ed. Michael Kiernan, Graham Rees, Alan Stewart, Maria Wakely, et al. 15 vols. Oxford, 1996–.Google Scholar
Bacon, Francis. The New Organo. Ed. and trans. Lisa Jardine and Michael Silverthorne. Cambridge, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baxandall, Michael. “A Dialogue on Art from the Court of Leonello d’Este: Angelo Decembrio’s De Politia Litteraria Pars LXVII.” Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institute. 26 (1963): 304–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baxandall, Michael. Giotto and the Orators: Humanist Observers of Painting in Italy and the Discovery of Pictorial Composition, 1350–145. Oxford, 1971.Google Scholar
Bennett, Jim. “Instruments and Ingenuity.” In Robert Hooke: Tercentennial Studies, ed. Michael Cooper and Michael Hunter, 65–76. Aldershot, 2006.Google Scholar
Binns, J. W. Intellectual Culture in Elizabethan and Jacobean England: The Latin Writings of the Ag. Leeds, 1990.Google Scholar
Binns, J. W. Latin Treatises on Poetry from Renaissance Englan. Signal Mountain, 1999.Google Scholar
Blekastad, Milada. Comenius: Versuch eines Umrisses von Leben, Werk und Schicksal des Jan Amos Komenský. Oslo, 1969.Google Scholar
Brann, Noel L. The Debate over the Origin of Genius in the Italian Renaissance: The Theories of Supernatural Frenzy and Natural Melancholy in Accord and in Conflict on the Threshold of the Scientific Revolutio. Leiden, 2002.Google Scholar
Bredekamp, Horst. The Lure of Antiquity and the Cult of the Machine: The Kunstkammer and the Evolution of Nature, Art, and Technolog. Trans. Brown, Allison. Princeton, 1995.Google Scholar
Briggs, John C. Francis Bacon and the Rhetoric of Natur. Cambridge, MA, 1989.10.4159/harvard.9780674731400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunce, Robin. “Thomas Hobbes’ Relationship with Francis Bacon — An Introduction.” Hobbes Studie. 16 (2003): 41–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calamy, Edmund. Calamy Revised: Being a Revision of the Edmund Calamy’s Account of the Ministers and Others Ejected and Silenced, 1660–. Ed. Matthews, Arnold G.. Oxford, 1934.Google Scholar
The Cambridge Companion to Bacon. Ed. Peltonen, Markku. Cambridge, 1996.Google Scholar
The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy. Ed. Schmitt, Charles B., Quentin Skinner, Eckhard Keßler, and Jill Kraye. Cambridge, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassan, Elodie. “The Status of Bacon in Gassendi’s Syntagma Philosophicum History of Logic.” Societate şi politică. 6 (2012): 52–65.Google Scholar
Caussin, Nicolas. Eloqventiae sacrae et hvmanae parallela, libri XV. Paris, 1619.Google Scholar
Cave, Terence. “ Enargeia: Erasmus and the Rhetoric of Presence in the Sixteenth Century.” L’esprit créateu. 16 (1976): 5–19.Google Scholar
Cave, Terence. The Cornucopian Text: Problems of Writing in the French Renaissanc. Oxford, 1979.Google Scholar
Céard, Jean. La nature et les prodiges: L’insolite au XVIe siècle en Franc. Geneva, 1977.Google Scholar
Charleton, Walter. A Brief Discourse Concerning the Different Wits of Me. London, 1669.Google Scholar
Chronis, Nikolaos. “H υπό του Francis Bacon παραδοχή Aριστοτελικών όρων.” Platon 32–33 (1980–81): 136–43.Google Scholar
Cicero, . Rhetorica. Ed. Wilkins, A. S.. 2 vols. Oxford, 1902–03.Google Scholar
Cicero, Rhetorica. De officii. Ed. Winterbottom, Michael. Oxford, 1994.Google Scholar
Clark, Donald Lemen. “The Requirements of a Poet: A Note on the Sources of Ben Jonson’s Timber, Paragraph 130.” Modern Philolog. 8 (1918): 413–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Stuart. Vanities of the Eye: Vision in Early Modern European Cultur. Oxford, 2007.Google Scholar
Close, A. J. “Commonplace Theories of Art and Nature in Classical Antiquity and in the Renaissance.” Journal of the History of Idea. 30 (1969): 467–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephen, Clucas. “In Search of ‘The True Logick’: Methodological Eclecticism Among the ‘Baconian Reformers.’” In Samuel Hartlib and Universal Reformation: Studies in Intellectual Communication, ed. Greengrass, Mark, Leslie, Michael, and Raylor, Timothy, 51–75. Cambridge, 1994.Google Scholar
Stephen, Clucas. “Scientia and Inductio Scientifica in the Logica Hamburgensis of Joachim Jungius.” In Scientia in Early Modern Philosophy: Seventeenth-Century Thinkers on Demonstrative Knowledge from First Principles, ed. Tom Sorrell, G. A. J. Rogers, and Jill Kraye, 53–70. Dordrecht, 2010.10.1007/978-90-481-3077-1_4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conti, Natale. Mythologia. Ed. and trans. Stephen, Brown and Mulryan, John. 2 vols. Tempe, 2006.Google Scholar
Cooper, Thomas. Thesaurus linguae Romanae et Britannica. London, 1565.Google Scholar
Copenhaver, Brian P. “Translation, Terminology and Style in Philosophical Discourse.” In The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosoph. (1988), 77–110.Google Scholar
Corneanu, Sorana. Regimens of the Mind: Boyle, Locke, and the Early Modern Cultura Animi Traditio. Chicago, 2011.10.7208/chicago/9780226116419.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corneanu, Sorana, and Vermeir, Koen. “Idols of the Imagination: Francis Bacon on the Imagination and the Medicine of the Mind.” Perspectives on Scienc. 20 (2012): 183–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crane, William G. Wit and Rhetoric in the Renaissance: The Formal Basis of Elizabethan Prose Styl. New York, 1937.10.7312/cran94640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cudworth, Ralph. A Sermon Preached before the Honourable House of Commons, at Westminster, March 31 164. Cambridge, 1647.Google Scholar
Curtius, E. R. European Literature and the Latin Middle Age. Trans. Willard R. Trask. New York, 1953.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, DaCosta, Thomas, . The Mastery of Nature: Aspects of Art, Science, and Humanism in the Renaissanc. Princeton, 1993.Google Scholar
Daniel, Stephen H. “Myth and the Grammar of Discovery in Francis Bacon.” Philosophy and Rhetori. 15 (1982): 219–37.Google Scholar
Darley, Gillian. John Evelyn: Living for Ingenuit. New Haven, 2006.Google Scholar
Daston, Lorraine, and Park, Katharine. Wonders and the Order of Nature, 1150–175. New York, 1998.Google Scholar
Davids, Thomas W. Annals of Evangelical Nonconformity in the County of Essex, From the Time of Wycliffe to the Restoratio. London, 1863.Google Scholar
DellaNeva, JoAnn, ed. Ciceronian Controversie. Cambridge, MA, 2007.Google Scholar
Mas, De, Enrico, . “Bernardino Telesio e la falsità di Aristotele. Il giudizio di Bacone e di Tobias Adami.” In Atti del convegno internazionale di studi su Bernardino Telesi. (1990), 167–79.Google Scholar
Detienne, Marcel, and Vernant, Jean-Pierre. Cunning Intelligence in Greek Culture and Societ. Trans. Lloyd, Janet. Chicago, 1991.Google Scholar
Donnelly, M. L. “Francis Bacon’s Early Reputation in England and the Question of John Milton’s Alleged Baconianism.” Prose Studie. 14 (1991): 1–20.10.1080/01440359108586419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eamon, William. Science and the Secrets of Nature: Books of Secrets in Medieval and Early Modern Cultur. Princeton, 1994.Google Scholar
Emison, Patricia A. Creating the “Divine” Artist: From Dante to Michelangel. Leiden, 2004.Google Scholar
Desiderius, Erasmus. Opera omnia Desiderii Erasmi Roterodami: Recognita et adnotatione critica instructa notisque illustrata. Ed. Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen and Union académique internationale. Amsterdam, 1969–.Google Scholar
Desiderius, Erasmus. The Collected Works of Erasmus. Ed. R. A. B. Mynors, Robert D. Sider, J. K. Sowards, Craig R. Thompson, et al. 86 vols. Toronto, 1974–.Google Scholar
Evans, R. J. W., and Marr, Alexander, eds. Curiosity and Wonder from the Renaissance to the Enlightenmen. Aldershot, 2006.Google Scholar
Fattori, Marta. “ Phantasia nella classificazione baconiana della scienza.” In Francis Bacon: Terminologia e fortuna nel XVII secol. (1984), 117–38.Google Scholar
Fattori, Marta. “Le Novum Organum de Francis Bacon: Problèmes de terminologie.” In Francis Bacon: Science et méthod. (1985), 79–92.Google Scholar
Fattori, Marta. “ Ingenium: Francis Bacon e la poesia elisabettiana.” In Ingenium propria hominis natur. (2002), 161–94.Google Scholar
Fattori, Marta. Études sur Francis Baco. Paris, 2012.Google Scholar
Feingold, Mordechai. The Mathematicians’ Apprenticeship: Science, Universities and Society in England, 1560–164. Cambridge, 1984.Google Scholar
Florio, John. Queen Anna’s New World of Words, or Dictionarie of the Italian and English Tongue. London, 1611.Google Scholar
Francis Bacon’s Legacy of Texts: The Art of Discovery Grows with Discovery. Ed. Sessions, William A.. New York, 1990.Google Scholar
Francis Bacon: Science et méthode. Ed. Malherbe, Michel and Pousseur, Jean-Marie. Paris, 1985.Google Scholar
Francis Bacon: Terminologia e fortuna nel XVII secolo. Ed. Fattori, Marta. Rome, 1984.Google Scholar
Fumaroli, Marc. L’âge de l’éloquence: Rhétorique et “res literaria” de la renaissance au seuil de l’époque classique. Geneva, 1980.Google Scholar
Galen, . Galeni omnia qvae extant opera: in Latinum sermonem conuers. 10 vols. 4th ed. Venice, 1565.Google Scholar
Galeni, Galen. Clavdii Galeni opera omnia. Ed. Kühn, C. G.. 20 vols. Leipzig, 1821–33.Google Scholar
Gaukroger, Stephen. Francis Bacon and the Transformation of Early-Modern Philosoph. Cambridge, 2001.10.1017/CBO9780511612688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gensini, Stefano. “L’ingegno e le metafore: Alle radici della creatività linguistica fra Cinque e Seicento.” Studi di estetic. 16 (1997): 135–62.Google Scholar
Gensini, Stefano. “ Ingenium/ingegno fra Huarte, Persio e Vico: le basi naturali dell’inventività umana.” In Ingenium propria hominis natur. (2002), 29–70.Google Scholar
Gesner, Conrad. Historiae animalium lib. I. De quadrupedibus animaliu. Zürich, 1551.Google Scholar
Assenza, Giachetti, Valeria, . “Bernardino Telesio: Il migliore dei moderni. I riferimenti a Telesio negli scritti di Francesco Bacone.” Rivista di storia della filosofi. 35 (1980): 41–78.Google Scholar
Giglioni, Guido. “ Historia and Materia: The Philosophical Implications of Francis Bacon’s Natural History.” Early Science and Medicin. 17 (2012a): 62–86.10.1163/157338212X631783CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guido, Giglioni. “How Bacon Became Baconian.” In The Mechanization of Natural Philosophy, ed. Sophie Roux and Daniel Garber, 27–54. Dordrecht, 2012b.Google Scholar
Gmelin, Hermann. “Das Prinzip der Imitatio in den romanischen Literaturen der Renaissance.” Romanische Forschunge. 46 (1932): 83–360.Google Scholar
Goclenius, Rudolph. Lexicon philosophicu. Frankfurt am Main, 1613.Google Scholar
Gontier, Thierry. “Homme couple ou réification de l’outil. Invention et humanisme chez Bacon.” Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étrange. 128 (2003a): 41–59.10.3917/rphi.031.0041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gontier, Thierry. Le vocabulaire de Baco. Paris, 2003b.Google Scholar
Grassi, Ernesto. Renaissance Humanism: Studies in Philosophy and Poetic. Binghamton, 1988.Google Scholar
Grassi, Ernesto. Rhetoric as Philosophy: The Humanist Traditio. Ed. Crusius, Timothy W.. Carbondale, 2001.Google Scholar
Green, Lawrence D. John Rainolds’s Oxford Lecture on Aristotle’s Rhetoric. Newark, NJ, 1986.Google Scholar
Greene, Robert A. “Whichcote, Wilkins, ‘Ingenuity,’ and the Reasonableness of Christianity.” Journal of the History of Idea. 42 (1981): 227–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, Thomas M. The Light in Troy: Imitation and Discovery in Renaissance Poetr. New Haven, 1982.Google Scholar
Hallyn, Fernand. “Port-Royal vs. Tesauro: Signe, figure, suject.” Baroqu. 9–10 (1980): 76–86.Google Scholar
Hanafi, Zakiya. The Monster in the Machine: Magic, Medicine, and the Marvelous in the Time of the Scientific Revolutio. Durham, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, Peter. “Curiosity, Forbidden Knowledge, and the Reformation of Natural Philosophy in Early Modern England.” Isi. 92 (2001): 265–90.Google ScholarPubMed
Samuel, Hartlib. The Hartlib Papers. CD-ROM. Ed. Patricia Barry, Margaret Chambers, Judith Crawford, William Hitchens, et al. Sheffield, 2002.Google Scholar
Hartmann, Anna-Maria. “Light from Darkness: The Relationship between Francis Bacon’s Prima Philosophia and His Concept of the Greek Fable.” The Seventeenth Centur. 26 (2011): 203–20.10.1080/0268117X.2011.10555667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, E. Ruth. The Inward Wits: Psychological Theory in the Middle Ages and the Renaissanc. London, 1975.Google Scholar
Hathaway, Baxter. The Age of Criticism: The Late Renaissance in Ital. Ithaca, 1962.Google Scholar
Hesse, Mary B. “Hooke’s Philosophical Algebra.” Isi. 57 (1966): 67–83.Google Scholar
Hidalgo-Serna, Emilio. “ Ingenium and Rhetoric in the Work of Vives.” Philosophy & Rhetori. 16 (1983): 228–41.Google Scholar
Hidalgo-Serna, Emilio. Das ingeniöse Denken bei Baltasar Gracían: Der “concepto” und seine logische Funktio. Munich, 1985.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. Dialogus physicus, sive de natura aeris conjectura sumpta ab experimenti. London, 1661.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. The Correspondence of Thomas Hobbe. Ed. Malcolm, Noel. 2 vols. Oxford, 1994.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. Leviatha. Ed. Noel Malcolm. 3 vols. Oxford, 2012.Google Scholar
Höltgen, K. J. “Clever Dogs and Nimble Spaniels: On the Iconography of Logic, Invention, and Imagination.” Explorations in Renaissance Cultur. 24 (1998): 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooke, Robert. The Posthumous Works of Robert Hook. Ed. Waller, Richard. London, 1705.Google Scholar
Horace, . Opera. Ed. Garrod, H. W. and Wickham, E. C.. Oxford, 1912.Google Scholar
Huarte, Juan. Examen de Ingenios. The Examination of Mens Wit. Trans. R[ichard] C[arew]. London, 1594.Google Scholar
Hunter, Michael. John Aubrey and the Realm of Learnin. London, 1975.Google Scholar
Hunter, Michael. Establishing the New Science: The Experience of the Royal Society. Woodbridge, 1989.Google Scholar
Hunter, Michael. “Robert Boyle and the Early Royal Society: A Reciprocal Exchange in the Making of Baconian Science.” British Journal for the History of Scienc. 40 (2007): 1–23.10.1017/S0007087406009083CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, Michael. Boyle: Between God and Scienc. New Haven, 2009.Google Scholar
Hunter, Michael, and Anstey, Peter. “Robert Boyle’s ‘Designe about Natural History.’” Early Science and Medicin. 13 (2008): 83–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingenium propria hominis natura. Ed. Stefano Gensini and Arturo Martone. Naples, 2002.Google Scholar
Iriarte, Mauricio de. El doctor Huarte de San Juan y su Examen de ingenios: Contribución a la historia de la psicología diferencia. Madrid, 1948.Google Scholar
Jardine, Lisa. Francis Bacon: Discovery and the Art of Discours. Cambridge, 1974.Google Scholar
Jardine, Lisa. “Lorenzo Valla and the Intellectual Origins of Humanist Dialectic.” Journal of the History of Philosoph. 15 (1977): 143–64.10.1353/hph.2008.0437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jardine, Lisa. “Experientia Literata ou Novum Organum? Le dilemme de la méthode scientifique de Bacon.” In Francis Bacon: Science et méthod. (1985), 135–57.Google Scholar
Jardine, Lisa. “ Experientia literata or Novum organum? The Dilemma of Bacon’s Scientific Method.” In Francis Bacon’s Legacy of Text. (1990), 47–68.Google Scholar
Jesseph, Douglas M. Squaring the Circle: The War between Hobbes and Walli. Chicago, 1999.Google Scholar
Jonson, Ben. Every Man Out of His Humou. Ed. Helen Ostovich. Manchester, 2001.Google Scholar
Kahn, Victoria. Machiavellian Rhetoric: From the Counter-Reformation to Milto. Princeton, 1994.10.1515/9781400821280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemp, Martin. “From ‘Mimesis’ to ‘Fantasia’: The Quattrocento Vocabulary of Creation, Inspiration and Genius in the Visual Arts.” Viato. 8 (1977): 347–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Kemp. “The ‘Super-Artist’ as Genius: The Sixteenth-Century View.” In Genius: The History of an Idea, ed. Penelope Murray, 32–51. Oxford, 1989.Google Scholar
Kenny, Neil. The Uses of Curiosity in Early Modern France and German. Oxford, 2004.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199271368.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keßler, Eckhard. “The Intellective Soul.” In The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosoph. (1988), 485–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, Jürgen. “Genius, Ingenium, Imagination: Aesthetic Theories of Production from the Renaissance to Romanticism.” In The Romantic Imagination: Literature and Art in England and Germany, ed. Burwick, Frederick and Klein, Jürgen, 19–62. Amsterdam, 1996.Google Scholar
Lewis, Charlton T.., and Short, Charles. A Latin-English Dictionar. Oxford, 1879.Google Scholar
Lewis, C. S. Studies in Word. Cambridge, 1960.Google Scholar
Lewis, Rhodri. Language, Mind and Nature: Artificial Languages in England from Bacon to Lock. Cambridge, 2007.Google Scholar
Lewis, Rhodri. “Hooke’s Two Buckets: Memory, Mnemotechnique and Knowledge in the Early Royal Society.” In Ars Reminiscendi: Mind and Memory in Renaissance Culture, ed. Beecher, Donald and Williams, Grant, 339–63. Toronto, 2009a.Google Scholar
Lewis, Rhodri. “A Kind of Sagacity: Francis Bacon, the Ars Memoriae and the Pursuit of Natural Knowledge.” Intellectual History Revie. 19 (2009b): 155–77.10.1080/17496970902981652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Rhodri. “Francis Bacon, Allegory and the Uses of Myth.” Review of English Studie. 61 (2010): 360–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Rhodri. William Petty on the Order of Nature: An Unpublished Manuscript Treatis. Tempe, 2012.Google Scholar
Rhodri, Lewis. “Impartiality and Disingenuousness in English Rational Religion.” In The Emergence of Impartiality: Towards an Archaeology of Objectivity, ed. Anita Traninger and Kathryn Murphy, 161–83. Leiden, 2013.Google Scholar
Lucretius, . De rerum natura. Ed. Rouse, W. H. D. and Smith, Martin F.. Cambridge, MA, 1982.Google Scholar
Lund, Roger D. “Wit, Judgment, and the Misprisions of Similitude.” Journal of the History of Idea. 65 (2001): 53–74.10.1353/jhi.2004.0017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, William T. Solomon’s Child: Method in the Early Royal Society of Londo. Stanford, 2001.Google Scholar
Machiavelli, Niccolò. The Princ. Ed. and trans. Quentin Skinner and Russell Price. Cambridge, 1988.Google Scholar
Mack, Peter. Renaissance Argument: Valla and Agricola in the Traditions of Rhetoric and Dialecti. Leiden, 1993.10.1163/9789004246959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peter, Mack. “Vives’s Contributions to Rhetoric and Dialectic.” In A Companion to Juan Luis Vives, ed. Charles Fantazzi, 227–76. Leiden, 2008.Google Scholar
Mack, Peter. A History of Renaissance Rhetoric, 1380–162. Oxford, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malherbe, Michel. “Bacon’s Critique of Logic.” In Francis Bacon’s Legacy of Text. (1990), 69–87.Google Scholar
Malherbe, Michel. “Bacon’s Method of Science.” In The Cambridge Companion to Baco. (1996), 75–98.10.1017/CCOL052143498X.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margolin, Jean-Claude. “Bacon, lecteur critique d’Aristote et de Telesio.” In Atti del convegno internazionale di studi su Bernardino Telesi. (1990), 135–66.Google Scholar
Marlowe, Christopher. Hero and Leande. London, 1598.Google Scholar
Martin, Julian. Francis Bacon, the State, and the Reform of Natural Philosoph. Cambridge, 1992.Google Scholar
McCormick, Ted. William Petty and the Ambitions of Political Arithmeti. Oxford, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDowell, Nicholas. Poetry and Allegiance in the English Civil Wars: Marvell and the Cause of Wi. Oxford, 2008.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199278008.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mersenne, Marin. La verité des sciences. Contre les septiqves ou Pyrrhonien. Paris, 1625.Google Scholar
John, Monfasani. “The Ciceronian Controversy.” In The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism. Volume 3: The Renaissance, ed. Glyn P. Norton, 395–401. Cambridge, 1999.Google Scholar
Mulligan, Lotte C.. “Robert Hooke and Certain Knowledge.” The Seventeenth Century. 7 (1992): 151–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nashe, Thomas. The Works of Thomas Nash. Ed. R. B. McKerrow and F. P. Wilson. 5 vols. Oxford, 1966.Google Scholar
Nauta, Lodi. In Defense of Common Sense: Lorenzo Valla’s Humanist Critique of Scholastic Philosoph. Cambridge, MA, 2009.Google Scholar
Newman, William R. Promethean Ambitions: Alchemy and the Quest to Perfect Natur. Chicago, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noreña, Carlos G. Juan Luis Vive. The Hague, 1970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noreña, Carlos G. Juan Luis Vives and the Emotion. Carbondale, 1989.Google Scholar
Olivieri, Grazia Tonelli. “Galen and Francis Bacon: Faculties of the Soul and the Classification of Knowledge.” In The Shapes of Knowledge from the Renaissance to the Enlightenment, ed. Kelley, Donald R. and Popkin, Richard H., 61–81. Dordrecht, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ong, Walter J. Ramus, Method, and the Decay of Dialogue. Cambridge, MA, 1958.Google Scholar
Park, Katharine. “Bacon’s Enchanted Glass.” Isis. 75 (1984): 290–302.Google Scholar
Park, Katharine. “The Organic Soul.” In The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosoph. (1988), 464–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parkin, Jon. Taming the Leviathan: The Reception of the Political and Religious Ideas of Thomas Hobbes in England, 1640–170. Cambridge, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Passannante, Gerard. The Lucretian Renaissance: Philology and the Afterlife of Traditio. Chicago, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, Annabel. “Pastoral versus Georgic: The Politics of Virgilian Quotation.” In Renaissance Genres, ed. Lewalski, Barbara, 241–67. Cambridge, MA, 1986.Google Scholar
Pépin, Jean. Mythe et allégorie: Les origines grecques et les contestations judéo-chrétienne. 2nd ed. Paris, 1976.Google Scholar
Pérez-Ramos, Antonio. Francis Bacon’s Idea of Science and the Maker’s Knowledge Tradition. Oxford, 1988.Google Scholar
Pérez-Ramos, Antonio. “Bacon’s Legacy.” In The Cambridge Companion to Baco. (1996), 311–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Persio, Antonio. Trattato dell’ingegno dell’huomo. Ed. Luciano Artese. Pisa, 1999.Google Scholar
Pesic, Peter. “The Clue to the Labyrinth: Francis Bacon and the Decryption of Nature.” Cryptologia. 24 (2000): 193–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
William, Petty. The Advice of W. P. to Mr. Samuel Hartlib. For the Advancement of Some Particular Parts of Learning. London, 1647 [1648].Google Scholar
Picciotto, Joanna. Labors of Innocence in Early Modern England. Cambridge, MA, 2010.Google Scholar
Piccolomini, Francesco. Vniversa philosophia de moribvs. Venice, 1583.Google Scholar
Pigman, George W. “Versions of Imitation in the Renaissance.” Renaissance Quarterl. 33.1 (1980): 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pliny the Elder. Naturalis historiae libri XXXVII. Ed. Ludwig von Jan and Karl Mayhoff. 6 vols. Leipzig, 1892–1909.Google Scholar
Pousseur, Jean-Marie. “De l’interprétation: Une logique pour l’invention.” Revue internationale de philosophie. 40 (1986): 378–98.Google Scholar
Quintilian, . Institutionis oratoriae libri duodecim. Ed. Winterbottom, Michael. 2 vols. Oxford, 1970.Google Scholar
Ramus, Petrus. Dialecticae institutiones. Paris, 1543.Google Scholar
Reiss, Timothy J.. The Discourse of Modernism. Ithaca, 1982.Google Scholar
Reuterswärd, Patrik. “The Dog in the Humanist’s Study.” Konsthistorisk Tidskrift. 50 (1981): 53–69.10.1080/00233608108603965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, Jennifer. “Assumed Simplicity and the Critique of Nobility: Or, How Castiglione Read Cicero.” Renaissance Quarterly. 54.2 (2001): 460–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Lissa, Schaffer, Simon, and Dear, Peter, eds. The Mindful Hand: Inquiry and Inventions from the Late Renaissance to Early Industrialisation. Amsterdam, 2007.Google Scholar
Robinet, André. Aux sources de l’esprit cartésien. Paris, 1996.Google Scholar
Rossi, Paolo. “Spiders, Ants, Epistemologists.” In Francis Bacon: Terminologia e fortuna nel XVII secol. (1984), 245–60.Google Scholar
Salingar, Leo. Dramatic Form in Shakespeare and the Jacobean. Cambridge, 1986.Google Scholar
Rose-Mary, Sargent. The Diffident Naturalist: Robert Boyle and the Philosophy of Experiment. Chicago, 1995.Google Scholar
Sargent, Rose-Mary. “Francis Bacon as an Advocate for Cooperative Scientific Research.” In The Cambridge Companion to Baco. (1996), 146–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawday, Jonathan. Engines of the Imagination: Renaissance Culture and the Rise of the Machine. London, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt-Biggemann, Wilhelm. Topica Universalis. Eine Modellgeschichte humanistischer und barocker Wissenschaft. Hamburg, 1983.Google Scholar
Scott, Izora. Controversies over the Imitation of Cicero. New York, 1910.Google Scholar
Seigel, Jerrold. Rhetoric and Philosophy in Renaissance Humanism: The Union of Eloquence and Wisdom, Petrarch to Valla. Princeton, 1968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Semler, Liam E.. The English Mannerist Poets and the Visual Arts. Madison, NJ, 1998.Google Scholar
Seneca, . Epistulae morale. Ed. L. D. Reynolds. 2 vols. Oxford, 1965.Google Scholar
Serjeantson, Richard W. “Herbert of Cherbury Before Deism: The Early Reception of the De veritate.” The Seventeenth Centur. 16 (2001a): 217–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serjeantson, Richard W. “The Passions and Animal Language, 1540–1700.” Journal of the History of Idea. 62 (2001b): 425–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Serjeantson, Richard W. “Natural Knowledge in the New Atlantis.” In Francis Bacon’s New Atlantis: New Interdisciplinary Essays, ed. Bronwyn Price, 82–105. Manchester, 2002.Google Scholar
Serjeantson, Richard W. “The Soul.” In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy in Early Modern Europe, ed. Desmond M. Clarke and Catherine Wilson, 119–41. Oxford, 2011.Google Scholar
Shapin, Steven, and Schaffer, Simon. Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Lif. Princeton, 1985.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Barbara. Probability and Certainty in Seventeenth-Century England: A Study of the Relationships between Natural Science, Religion, History, Law, and Literature. Princeton, 1983.Google Scholar
Sidney, Philip. Miscellaneous Prose of Sir Philip Sidne. Ed. Katherine Duncan-Jones and Jan Van Dorsten. Oxford, 1973.10.1093/actrade/9780198118800.book.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. Reason and Rhetoric in the Philosophy of Hobbe. Cambridge, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Pamela H. The Body of the Artisan: Art and Experience in the Scientific Revolutio. Chicago, 2004.10.7208/chicago/9780226764269.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spranzi, Marta. The Art of Dialectic Between Dialogue and Rhetoric: The Aristotelian Traditio. Amsterdam, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprat, Thomas. The History of the Royal-Society of London for the Improving of Natural Knowledg. London, 1667.Google Scholar
Spruit, Leen. “Telesio’s Reform of the Philosophy of Mind.” Bruniana & Campanellian. 3 (1997): 123–43.Google Scholar
Summers, David. Michelangelo and the Language of Ar. Princeton, 1981.Google Scholar
Summers, David. The Judgment of Sense: Renaissance Naturalism and the Rise of Aesthetic. Cambridge, 1987.Google Scholar
Tautz, Kurt. Die Bibliothekare der churfürstlichen Bibliothek zu Cölln an der Spree… im siebzehnten Jahrhunder. Leipzig, 1925.Google Scholar
Telle, Joachim. “Mythologie und Alchemie. Zum Fortleben der antiken Götter in der Frühneuzeitlichen Alchemieliteratur.” In Humanismus und Naturwissenschaften, ed. Rudolf Schmitz and Fritz Krafft, 135–54. Boppard, 1980.Google Scholar
Timpanaro, Sebastiano. The Genesis of Lachmann’s Metho. Ed. and trans. Glenn W. Most. Chicago, 2005.Google Scholar
Trevor-Roper, Hugh. “Three Foreigners: The Philosophers of the Puritan Revolution.” In The Crisis of the Seventeenth Century: Religion, the Reformation, and Social Change, 219–71. Indianapolis, 2001.Google Scholar
Tritonio, Marc’Antonio. Mythologi. Bologna, 1560.Google Scholar
Vallini, Cristina. “ Genius / Ingenium: Derive semantiche.” In Ingenium propria hominis natur. (2002), 3–28.Google Scholar
Vasoli, Cesare. La dialettica e la retorica dell’umanesimo: Invenzione e metodo nella cultura del XV e XVI secol. Milan, 1968.Google Scholar
Vérin, Hélène. La gloire des ingénieurs: L’intelligence technique du XVIe au XVIIIe siècl. Paris, 1993.Google Scholar
Vickers, Brian. “Bacon and Rhetoric.” In The Cambridge Companion to Baco. (1996), 200–31.10.1017/CCOL052143498X.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vidal, Fernando. The Sciences of the Soul: The Early Modern Origins of Psycholog. Trans. Saskia Brown. Chicago, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visorius, Joannes. Ingeniosa, nec minvs elegans ad dialectices candidatos methodv. Paris, 1534.Google Scholar
Vitruvius, . De architectura libri dece. Ed. Valentin Rose. Leipzig, 1867.Google Scholar
Vives, Juan Luis. Joannis Ludovici Vivis Valentini opera omnia. Ed. Gregorio Mayáns. 8 vols. Valencia, 1782–90.Google Scholar
Vives, Juan Luis. Juan Luis Vives Against the Pseudodialecticians: A Humanist Attack on Medieval Logi. Ed. Rita Guerlac. Dordrecht, 1979.Google Scholar
Wallace, Andrew. Virgil’s Schoolboys: The Poetics of Pedagogy in Renaissance Englan. Oxford, 2011.Google Scholar
Wallace, Karl R. Francis Bacon on the Nature of Man: The Faculties of Man’s Sou. Urbana, 1967.Google Scholar
Webster, Charles. The Great Instauration: Science, Medicine and Reform, 1626–166. London, 1975.Google Scholar
Webster, John. William Temple’s Analysis of Sir Philip Sidney’s Apology for Poetry: An Edition and Translatio. Binghamton, 1984.Google Scholar
Weeks, Sophie. “The Role of Mechanics in Bacon’s Great Instauration.” In Philosophies of Technology: Francis Bacon and his Contemporaries, ed. Claus Zittel, Gisela Engel, Romano Nanni, and Nicole C. Karafyllis, 133–95. Leiden, 2008.Google Scholar
Weinberg, Bernard. A History of Literary Criticism in the Italian Renaissanc. 2 vols. Chicago, 1961.Google Scholar
Wills, Richard. De re poetic. Ed. and trans. Alastair Fowler. Oxford, 1958.Google Scholar
Wilson, Thomas. The Rule of Reaso. London, 1551.Google Scholar
Wolfe, Jessica. Humanism, Machinery, and Renaissance Literatur. Cambridge, 2004.Google Scholar
Wolff, Emil. Francis Bacon und seine Quellen. 2 vols. Berlin, 1910–12.Google Scholar
Zagorin, Perez. Francis Baco. Princeton, 1998.Google Scholar
Zilsel, Edgar. Die Entstehung des Geniebegriffes. Ein Beitrag zur Ideengeschichte der Antike und des Frühkapitalismu. Tübingen, 1926.Google Scholar