Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-31T19:27:16.531Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Epistemologies of Touch in Early Modern Holy Autopsies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2022

Viktoria von Hoffmann
Viktoria von Hoffmann*
Affiliation:
F.R.S.-FNRS / University of Liège
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article explores the epistemic value of touch in Italian Renaissance anatomy. Using archival and printed postmortem records from canonization processes and anatomical writings, it shows that haptic expertise (Greek ἅπτομαι [haptomai]: to touch) entailed not only the acquisition of practical skills but also the ability to discern, experience, and fully describe organic substances. Looking at the practices, languages, and theories underpinning medical and holy anatomies, I propose that haptic epistemologies lay at the heart of the understanding of the body in the early modern period, a time largely recognized to have transformed people's understanding and experience of visuality in the sciences and the arts.

Type
Articles
Information
Renaissance Quarterly , Volume 75 , Issue 2 , Summer 2022 , pp. 542 - 582
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by the Renaissance Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I thank Allen Grieco, Katharine Park, Cynthia Klestinec, and the Villa I Tatti community for discussions at the early stages of this research. I am grateful to Pierre Bonnet and his team for inviting me into a (very haptic) dissecting room; to Christophe Masson, Carl Havelange, Emma Spary, Jennifer Oliver, Marie Thébaud-Sorger, and the TORCH Network “Writing Technologies”; and to the two RQ reviewers. This work was funded by the F.R.S.-FNRS and the Research Units Traverses and Transitions (University of Liège).

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Archivio Apostolico Vaticano (AAV), Vatican City, Congregatio Sacrorum Rituum Processus (Rit. Proc.) 762 (Andrea Corsini).Google Scholar
AAV, Rit. Proc. 2009 (Giacomo della Marca).Google Scholar
AAV, Rit. Proc. 2812 (Angelo del Pas).Google Scholar
AAV, Rit. Proc. 3156 (Teresa of Ávila).Google Scholar
Agrimi, Jole, and Crisciani, Chiara. “Per una Ricerca su Experimentum-Experimenta: Riflessione Epistemologica e Tradizione Medica (secoli XIII–XV).” In Presenza del Lessico Greco e Latino nelle Lingue Contemporanee, ed. Janni, Pietro and Mazzini, Innocenzo, 9–49. Macerata: Univeristà degli Studi di Macerata, 1990.Google Scholar
“AHR Forum: The Senses in History.” Special issue, American Historical Review 116.2 (April 2011): 307–400.Google Scholar
Andretta, Elisa. “Anatomie du Vénérable dans la Rome de la Contre-Réforme: Les autopsies d'Ignace de Loyola et de Philippe Neri.” In Conflicting Duties: Science, Medicine and Religion in Rome, 1550–1750, ed. Donato, Maria Pia and Kraye, Jill, 255–80. London: Warburg Institute; Turin: Nino Aragno Editore, 2009.Google Scholar
Andretta, Elisa. Roma Medica: Anatomie d'un système médical au XVIe siècle. Rome: École Française de Rome, 2011.Google Scholar
Bénatouïl, Thomas, and Draelants, Isabelle, eds. Expertus sum: L'expérience par les sens dans la philosophie naturelle médiévale. Florence: SISMEL Edizioni del Galuzzo, 2011.Google Scholar
Beneduce, Chiara. “Personalized Medicine and Complexio: ‘What is Human?’ as a Medical Question.” Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics 21.2 (2019): 89–98.Google Scholar
Bertoloni Meli, Domenico. Mechanism, Experiment, Disease: Marcello Malpighi and Seventeenth-Century Anatomy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Bertoloni Meli, Domenico, and Wilkin, Rebecca, eds. “Observation and Experiment in Mechanistic Anatomy.” Special issue, Early Science and Medicine 13.6 (2008): 531–709.10.1163/157338208X362679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bigotti, Fabrizio. Physiology of the Soul: Mind, Body and Matter in the Galenic Tradition of the Late Renaissance (1550–1630). Turnhout: Brepols, 2019.10.1484/M.DESCARTES-EB.5.116076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boddice, Rob, and Smith, Mark. Emotion, Sense, Experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020.Google Scholar
The Body as Object and Instrument of Knowledge: Embodied Empiricism in Early Modern Science. Ed. Charles T. Wolfe and Ofer Gal. Dordrecht: Springer, 2010.Google Scholar
The Body of Evidence: Corpses and Proofs in Early Modern European Medicine. Ed. Francesco P. De Ceglia. Leiden: Brill, 2020.Google Scholar
Boer, Weitse de, and Göttler, Christine, eds. Religion and the Senses in Early Modern Europe. Leiden: Brill, 2012.Google Scholar
Bouley, Bradford A. Pious Postmortems: Anatomy, Sanctity, and the Catholic Church in Early Modern Europe. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Bouvier, Michel. “De l'incorruptibilité des corps saints.” In Les Miracles, miroirs des corps, ed. Gélis, Jacques and Redon, Odile, 193–221. Paris: Presses et publications de l'Université de Paris VIII–Vincennes à Saint-Denis, 1983.Google Scholar
Breve Relatione della Vita, Miracoli, et Canonizatione della Gloriosa Vergine S. Teresa di Giesù Fondatrice de'Carmelitani Scalzi. Rome: Bartolomeo Zannetti, 1622.Google Scholar
Brill's Companion to the Reception of Galen. Ed. Petros Bouras-Vallianatos and Barbara Zipser. Leiden: Brill, 2019.Google Scholar
Burke, Peter. “How to Be a Counter-Reformation Saint.” In Religion and Society in Early Modern Europe 1500–1800, ed. von Greyerz, Kaspar, 45–55. London: German Historical Institute, 1984.Google Scholar
Bynum, Caroline Walker. “The Female Body and Religious Practice in the Later Middle Ages.” In Fragmentation and Redemption: Essays on Gender and the Human Body in Medieval Religion, ed. Bynum, Caroline Walker, 181–238. New York: Urzone Publishers, 1991.Google Scholar
Bynum, Caroline Walker. The Resurrection of the Body in Western Christianity, 200–1336. New York: Columbia University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Bynum, Caroline Walker. Christian Materiality: An Essay on Religion in Late Medieval Europe. New York: Zone Books, 2011.Google Scholar
Bynum, William F., and Porter, Roy, eds. Medicine and the Five Senses. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Canetti, Luigi. Frammenti di eternità: Corpi e reliquie tra antichità e medioevo. Rome: Viella, 2002.Google Scholar
Carlino, Andrea. “L'exception et la règle: A propos du XVe livre du De re anatomica de Realdo Colombo.” In Maladies, Médecines, et Sociétés: Approches historiques pour le présent; actes du VIe colloque d'Histoire au présent, 1:170–76. Paris: L'Harmattan Association “Histoire au présent,” 1993.Google Scholar
Carlino, Andrea. Books of the Body: Anatomical Ritual and Renaissance Learning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Carpi, Jacopo Berengario da. Carpi Commentaria cum Amplissimis Additionibus Super Anatomia Mundini. Bologna: Girolamo de’ Benedetti, 1521.Google Scholar
Carrillo-Rangel, David, Nieto-Isabel, Delfi I., and García, Pablo Acosta-, eds. Touching, Devotional Practices, and Visionary Experience in the Late Middle Ages. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019.Google Scholar
Casserius, Julius. De Vocis Auditusque Organis Historia Anatomica. Ferrara: Victorius Baldinus, n.d., ca. 1600.Google Scholar
Casserius, Julius. The Larynx, Organ of Voice by Julius Casserius. Ed. Hast, Malcolm H. and Holtsmark, Erling B.. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksells, 1969.Google Scholar
Cavallo, Sandra. Artisans of the Body in Early Modern Italy: Identities, Families and Masculinities. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Chandelier, Joël, and Robert, Aurélien. “Nature humaine et complexion du corps chez les médecins italiens de la fin du Moyen Âge.” Revue de Synthèse 134.4 (2013): 473–510.Google Scholar
Christofani, Federigo. Vita di S. Andreae Corsini Fiorentino dell'ordine carmelitano vescovo di Fiesole: Ràccolta dalla Vita Latina scritta da Monsignor Francesco Venturi Vescovo di S. Severo; Con gli atti della Canonizatione, e con la descrittione del Teatro. Rome: Bartolomeo Zannetti, 1629.Google Scholar
Ciappelli, Giovanni. Un Santo alla battaglia di Anghiari: La “vita” e il culto di Andrea Corsini nella Firenze del Rinascimento. Florence: SISMEL Edizioni del Galluzzo, 2007.Google Scholar
Classen, Constance. The Book of Touch. Oxford: Berg, 2005.Google Scholar
Classen, Constance. The Deepest Sense: A Cultural History of Touch. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Colombo, Realdo. De Re Anatomica Libri XV. Venice: Nicolai Bevilacquae, 1559.Google Scholar
Copeland, Clare. “Sanctity.” In The Ashgate Research Companion to the Counter-Reformation, ed. Bamji, Alexandra, Janssen, Geert H., and Laven, Mary, 225–42. London: Routledge, 2016.Google Scholar
Corbin, Alain. “Histoire et Anthropologie sensorielle.” Anthropologie et Sociétés 14.2 (1990): 13–24.Google Scholar
Crisciani, Chiara. “Fatti, teorie, ‘narration’ e malati a corte: Note su empirismo in medicine nel tardo-medioevo.” Quaderni storici 108.36.3 (December 2001): 695–718.Google Scholar
Cunningham, Andrew. The Anatomical Renaissance: The Resurrection of the Anatomical Projects of the Ancients. Aldershot: Scolar Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Cunsolo, Elisabetta. “Giulio Casserio e la pubblicazione del De Vocis Auditusque organis tra Padova e Ferrara all'inizio del ’600.” Mélanges de l’école française de Rome: Italie Méditerranée 120.2 (2008): 385–405.Google Scholar
Dacome, Lucia. Malleable Anatomies: Models, Makers, and Material Culture in Eighteenth-Century Italy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Daston, Lorraine. “Marvelous Facts and Miraculous Evidence in Early Modern Europe.” Critical Inquiry 18.1 (1991): 93–124.Google Scholar
Daston, Lorraine, and Park, Katharine. Wonders and the Order of Nature, 1150–1750. New York: Zone Books, 1998.Google Scholar
De Abditis Nonnullis ac Mirandis Morborum et Sanationum Causis. Antonio Benivieni. Ed. Giorgio Weber. Florence: Olschki, 1994.Google Scholar
Dear, Peter. Discipline and Experience: The Mathematical Way in the Scientific Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995.10.7208/chicago/9780226139524.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Ceglia, Francesco P. “Introduction: Corpses, Evidence and Medical Knowledge in the Late Middle Ages and the Early Modern Age.” In The Body of Evidence (2020), 1–20.Google Scholar
De Renzi, Silvia. “Witnesses of the Body: Medico-Legal Cases in Seventeenth-Century Rome.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 33.2 (2002): 219–42.10.1016/S0039-3681(02)00005-5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Renzi, Silvia. “Medical Competence, Anatomy and the Polity in Seventeenth-Century Rome.” Renaissance Studies 21.4 (2007): 551–67.Google ScholarPubMed
De Renzi, Silvia. “Per una biografia di Paolo Zacchia: Nuovi documenti e ipotesi di ricercar.” In Paolo Zacchia (2008), 50–73.Google Scholar
De Renzi, Silvia, Bresadola, Marco, and Conforti, Maria, eds. Pathology in Practice: Diseases and Dissections in Early Modern Europe. London: Routledge, 2018.Google Scholar
De Renzi, Silvia, and Conforti, Maria. “Sapere anatomico negli ospedali romani: Formazione dei chirurghi e pratiche sperimentali (1620–1720).” In Rome et la science moderne: Entre Renaissance et Lumières, ed. Romano, Antonella, 433–72. Rome: École Française de Rome, 2008.Google Scholar
Ditchfield, Simon. “How Not to Be a Counter-Reformation Saint: The Attempted Canonization of Pope Gregory X, 1622–45.” Papers of the British School at Rome 60 (1992): 379–422.10.1017/S0068246200009879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ditchfield, Simon. Liturgy, Sanctity and History in Tridentine Italy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Ditchfield, Simon. “Thinking with Saints: Sanctity and Society in the Early Modern World.” Critical Inquiry 35.3 (2009): 552–84.Google Scholar
Donato, Marie Pia. “Anatomia, autopsia, sectio: Problem di fonti e di metodo (secoli XVI–XVII).” In Anatome: Sezione, scomposizione, raffigurazione del corpo nell'età moderna, ed. Olmi, Giuseppe and Pancino, Claudia, 137–60. Bologna: Bononia University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Donato, Marie Pia. “Galen in an Age of Change (1650–1820).” In Brill's Companion to the Reception of Galen (2019), 487–507.Google Scholar
Duden, Barbara. The Woman Beneath the Skin: A Doctor's Patients in Eighteenth-Century Germany. Trans. Dunlap Thomas. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Duffin, Jacalyn. Medical Miracles: Doctors, Saints, and Healing in the Modern World. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Duffin, Jacalyn. “Questioning Medicine in Seventeenth-Century Rome: The Consultations of Paolo Zacchia.” Bulletin canadien d'histoire de la médecine / Canadian Bulletin of Medical History 28.1 (2011): 149–70.Google ScholarPubMed
Eamon, William. Science and the Secrets of Nature: Books of Secrets in Medieval and Early Modern Culture. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Fasciculus Medicinae. Venice: Giovanni de'Gregori, 1495.Google Scholar
Fortuna, Stefania. “The Latin Editions of Galen's Opera Omnia (1490–1625) and Their Prefaces.” Early Science and Medicine 17.4 (2012): 391–412.10.1163/1573382320120003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
French, Roger. “A Note on the Anatomical Accessus of the Middle Ages.” Medical History 23 (1979): 461–68.Google ScholarPubMed
French, Roger. “Berengario da Carpi and the Use of Commentary in Anatomical Teaching.” In The Medical Renaissance of the Sixteenth Century, ed. Wear, Andrew, French, Roger K., and Lonie, Iain M., 42–74. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
French, Roger. Dissection and Vivisection in the European Renaissance. Farnham: Ashgate, 1999.Google Scholar
Gadebusch Bondio, Mariacarla, ed. Die Hand: Elemente einer Medizin- und Kulturgeschichte. Berlin: Lit, 2010.Google Scholar
Galen of Pergamon. Works on Human Nature, Volume I: “Mixtures” (“De Temperamentis”). Ed. Singer, P. N. and Van der Eijk, Philip J., with Tassinari, Piero. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
García-Ballester, Luis. “The New Galen: A Challenge to Latin Galenism in Thirteenth-Century Montpellier.” In Text and Tradition: Studies in Ancient Medicine and Its Transmission; Presented to Jutta Kollesch, ed. Nickel, Klaus-Dietrich Fischer, Diethard, and Potter, Paul, 55–83. Leiden: Brill, 1998.Google Scholar
García-Ballester, Luis, French, Roger, Arrizabalaga, Jon, and Cunningham, Andrew, eds. Practical Medicine from Salerno to the Black Death. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Gentilcore, David. “Contesting Illness in Early Modern Naples: Miracolati, Physicians and the Congregation of Rites.” Past and Present 148 (1995): 117–48.Google Scholar
Gowing, Laura. Common Bodies: Women, Touch and Power in Seventeenth-Century England. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Green, Monica H. Making Women's Medicine Masculine: The Rise of Male Authority in Pre-Modern Gynaecology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Harvey, Elizabeth D. Sensible Flesh: On Touch in Early Modern Culture. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Harvey, Elizabeth D. “The Portal of Touch.” American Historical Review 116.2 (2011): 385–400.Google Scholar
Heller-Roazen, Daniel. The Inner Touch: Archaeology of a Sensation. New York: Zone Books, 2007.Google Scholar
Hendriksen, Marieke. Elegant Anatomy: The Eighteenth-Century Leiden Anatomical Collections. Leiden: Brill, 2015.Google Scholar
Heseler, Baldasar. Andreas Vesalius’ First Public Anatomy at Bologna 1540: An Eyewitness Report by Baldasar Heseler Medicinae Scolaris Together with His Notes on Matthaeus Curtius’ Lectures on Anatomia Mundini. Ed. Eriksson, Ruben. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksells, 1959.Google Scholar
Histories of Scientific Observation. Ed. Lorraine Daston and Elizabeth Lunbeck. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Howes, David, ed. Empire of the Senses: The Sensual Culture Reader. Oxford: Berg, 2005.Google Scholar
Howes, David. “Charting the Sensorial Revolution.” Senses and Society 1.1 (2006): 113–26.Google Scholar
“I cinque sensi / The Five Senses.” Special issue, Micrologus: Natura, scienze e società medievali 10 (2002).Google Scholar
Jacquart, Danielle. “De crasis à complexio: Note sur le vocabulaire du tempérament en latin médiéval.” In Textes médicaux latins antiques, ed. Sabbah, Guy, 71–76. Saint-Étienne: Publications de l'Université de Saint-Étienne, 1984.Google Scholar
Jacquart, Danielle. “La notion d’ingenium dans la médecine médiévale.” In Knowledge and the Sciences in Medieval Philosophy: Proceedings of the Eighth International Congress of Medieval Philosophy (S.I.E.P.M.), Helsinki, 24–29 August 1987, ed. Knuuttila, Simo, Työrinoja, Reijo, and Ebbesen, Sten, 2:62–70. Helsinki: Yliopistopaino, 1990.Google Scholar
Johnson, Geraldine. “Touch, Tactility, and the Reception of Sculpture in Early Modern Italy.” In A Companion to Art Theory, ed. Smith, Paul and Wilde, Carolyn, 61–74. Oxford: Blackwell, 2008.Google Scholar
Johnson, Geraldine. “Embodying Devotion: Multisensory Encounters with Donatello's Crucifix in S. Croce.” Renaissance Quarterly 73.4 (2020): 1179–234.Google Scholar
Jones, Lynette. Haptics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Jütte, Robert. A History of the Senses: From Antiquity to Cyberspace. Trans. James Lynn. Oxford: Polity, 2003.Google Scholar
Kambaskovic-Sawers, Danijela, and Wolfe, Charles T.. “The Senses in Philosophy and Science: From the Nobility of Sight to the Materialism of Touch.” In A Cultural History of the Senses in the Renaissance, ed. Roodenburg, Herman, 107–25. London: Bloomsbury, 2014.Google Scholar
Kaye, Joel. A History of Balance, 1250–1375: The Emergence of a New Model of Equilibrium and Its Impact on Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Klestinec, Cynthia. “Civility, Comportment, and the Anatomy Theater: Girolamo Fabrici and His Medical Students in Renaissance Padua.” Renaissance Quarterly 60.2 (2007): 434–63.Google ScholarPubMed
Klestinec, Cynthia. “Practical Experience in Anatomy.” In The Body as Object (2010), 33–57.Google Scholar
Klestinec, Cynthia. Theaters of Anatomy: Students, Teachers, and Traditions of Dissection in Renaissance Venice. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Klestinec, Cynthia. “Touch, Trust, and Compliance in Early Modern Medical Practice.” In The Edinburgh Companion to the Critical Medical Humanities, ed. Whitehead, Anne, Woods, Angela, Atkinson, Sarah, et al. , 209–24. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Kusukawa, Sachiko. Picturing the Book of Nature: Image, Text, and Argument in 16th-Century Human Anatomy and Medical Botany. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012.10.7208/chicago/9780226465289.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuuliala, Jenni. “Cure, Community, and the Miraculous in Early Modern Florence.” In Lived Religion and Everyday Life in Early Modern Hagiographic Material, ed. Kuuliala, Jenni, Peake, Rose-Marie, and Räisänen-Schröder, Päivi, 265–92. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019.Google Scholar
Kuuliala, Jenni. “The Saint as Medicator: Medicine and the Miraculous in Fifteenth- and Sixteenth-Century Italy.” Social History of Medicine 34.3 (2021): 703–22.Google ScholarPubMed
Lawrence, Christopher, and Shapin, Steven, eds. Science Incarnate: Historical Embodiments of Natural Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Lind, Levi Robert. Studies in Pre-Vesalian Anatomy: Biography, Translations, Documents. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society, 1975.Google Scholar
Long, Pamela. Artisan / Practitioners and the Rise of the New Sciences 1400–1600. Corvallis: Oregon State University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Maclean, Ian. Logic, Signs and Nature in the Renaissance: The Case of Learned Medicine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Mandressi, Rafael. Le regard de l'anatomiste: Dissections et invention du corps en Occident. Paris: Seuil, 2003.Google Scholar
Mandressi, Rafael. “De l’œil et du texte: Preuve, expérience et témoignage dans les ‘sciences du corps.’” Communications 84.1 (2009): 103–18.Google Scholar
Massa, Niccolò. Liber Introductorius Anatomiae, siue Dissectionis Corporis Humani. Venice, 1536.Google Scholar
Maurette, Pablo. “Touch, Hands, Kiss, Skin: Tactility in Early Modern Europe.” PhD diss., University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2013.Google Scholar
Maurette, Pablo. “Plato's Hermaphrodite and a Vindication of the Sense of Touch in the Sixteenth Century.” Renaissance Quarterly 68.3 (2015): 872–98.Google Scholar
Maurette, Pablo. The Forgotten Sense: Meditations on Touch. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2018a.Google Scholar
Maurette, Pablo. “The Organ of Organs: Vesalius and the Wonders of the Human Hand.” Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies 48.1 (2018b): 105–24.10.1215/10829636-4280873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McVaugh, Michael. “Galen in the Medieval Universities, 1200–1400.” In Brill's Companion to the Reception of Galen (2019), 381–92.Google Scholar
Medicine and the Italian Universities 1250–1600. Ed. Nancy Siraisi. Leiden: Brill, 2001.Google Scholar
Morrall, Andrew, Laven, Mary, and Ivanic, Suzanna, eds. Religious Materiality in the Early Modern World. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Moshenska, Joe. Feeling Pleasures: The Sense of Touch in Renaissance England. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Murphy, Hannah. “Skin and Disease in Early Modern Medicine: Jan Jessen's De cute, et cutaneis affectibus (1601).” Bulletin of the History of Medicine 94.2 (2020): 179–214.Google Scholar
Nutton, Vivian. “The Fortunes of Galen.” In The Cambridge Companion to Galen, ed. Hankinson, Robert J., 355–90. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Nutton, Vivian. “Renaissance Galenism, 1540–1640: Flexibility or an Increasing Irrelevance?” In Brill's Companion to the Reception of Galen (2019), 472–86.Google Scholar
O'Rourke Boyle, Marjorie. Senses of Touch: Human Dignity and Deformity from Michelangelo to Calvin. Leiden: Brill, 1998.Google Scholar
Papa, Giovanni. “La Sacra Congregazione dei Riti nel primo periodo di attività (1588–1624).” In Miscellanea in occasione del IV centenario della Congregazione per le Cause dei Santi (1588–1988), 13–52. Vatican City: Città del Vaticano, 1988.Google Scholar
Parisi, David. Archaeologies of Touch: Interfacing with Haptics from Electricity to Computing. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Park, Katharine. “The Criminal and the Saintly Body: Autopsy and Dissection in Renaissance Italy.” Renaissance Quarterly 47.1 (1994): 1–33.Google ScholarPubMed
Park, Katharine. Secrets of Women: Gender, Generation, and the Origins of Human Dissection. New York: Zone Books, 2006.Google Scholar
Park, Katharine. “Holy Autopsies: Saintly Bodies and Medical Expertise, 1300–1600.” In The Body in Early Modern Italy, ed. Hairston, Julia and Stephens, Walter, 61–73. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Park, Katharine. “Observation in the Margins, 500–1500.” In Histories of Scientific Observation (2011), 15–44.Google Scholar
Pastore, Alessandro, and Rossi, Giovanni, eds. Paolo Zacchia, 1584–1659: Alle origini della medicina legale. Milan: FrancoAngeli, 2008.Google Scholar
Paterson, Mark. The Senses of Touch: Haptics, Affects, and Technologies. Oxford: Berg, 2007.Google Scholar
“La pelle umana / The Human Skin.” Special issue, Micrologus: Natura, scienze e società medievali 13 (2005).Google Scholar
Pomata, Gianna. “Malpighi and the Holy Body: Medical Experts and Miraculous Evidence in Seventeenth-Century Italy.” Renaissance Studies 21.4 (2007): 568–86.Google Scholar
Pomata, Gianna. “Sharing Cases: The Observationes in Early Modern Medicine.” Early Science and Medicine 15.3 (2010): 193–236.Google ScholarPubMed
Pomata, Gianna. “Observation Rising: Birth of an Epistemic genre, ca. 1500–1650.” In Histories of Scientific Observation (2011), 45–80.Google Scholar
Pomata, Gianna. “The Medical Case Narrative: Distant Reading of an Epistemic Genre.” Literature and Medicine 32.1 (2014): 1–23.Google ScholarPubMed
Pomata, Gianna, and Siraisi, Nancy, eds. Historia: Empiricism and Erudition in Early Modern Europe. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Il primo processo per San Filippo Neri nel codice vaticano latino 3798 e in altri esemplari dell'Archivio dell'Oratorio di Roma, vol. 2. Ed. Incisa della Rocchetta. Vatican City: Biblioteca apostolica vaticana, 1958.Google Scholar
Quiviger, François. The Sensory World of Italian Renaissance Art. London: Reaktion Books, 2010.Google Scholar
Randolph, Adrian W. B. Touching Objects: Intimate Experiences of Italian Fifteenth-Century Art. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Reinarz, Jonathan, and Siena, Kevin, eds. A Medical History of Skin: Scratching the Surface. London: Pickering and Chatto, 2013.Google Scholar
Roberts, Lissa, Dear, Peter, and Schaffer, Simon, eds. The Mindful Hand: Inquiry and Invention from the Late Renaissance to Early Industrialization. Amsterdam: Koninkliijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, 2007.Google Scholar
Robinson, Kira. Healers in the Making: Students, Physicians, and Medical Education in Medieval Bologna (1250–1550). Leiden: Brill, 2020.Google Scholar
Rowe, Katherine. “‘God's Handy Worke’: Divine Complicity and the Anatomist's Touch.” In The Body in Parts: Fantasies of Corporeality in Early Modern Europe, ed. Hillman, David and Mazzio, Carla, 284–309. London: Routledge, 1997.Google Scholar
Rowe, Katherine. Dead Hands: Fictions of Agency, Renaissance to Modern. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Salmann, Jean-Michel. Naples et ses saints à l’âge baroque: 1540–1750. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1994.Google Scholar
Savoia, Paolo. Gaspare Tagliacozzi and Early Modern Surgery: Faces, Men, and Pain. London: Routledge, 2019.Google Scholar
Sawday, Jonathan. The Body Emblazoned: Dissection and the Human Body in Renaissance Culture. London: Routledge, 1996.Google Scholar
Shapin, Steven. A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Shapin, Steven, and Schaffer, Simon. Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Shotwell, Allen. “Animals, Pictures and Skeletons: Andreas Vesalius's Reinvention of the Public Anatomy Lesson.” Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences 71.1 (2016): 1–18.Google ScholarPubMed
Shotwell, Allen. “Dissection Techniques, Forensics and Anatomy in the 16th Century.” In The Body of Evidence (2020), 107–18.Google Scholar
Siraisi, Nancy. Taddeo Alderotti and His Pupils: Two Generations of Italian Medical Learning. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Siraisi, Nancy. “‘Remarkable’ Diseases, ‘Remarkable’ Cures, and Personal Experience in Renaissance Medical Texts.” In Medicine and the Italian Universities (2001a), 226–52.Google Scholar
Siraisi, Nancy. “Signs and Evidence: Autopsy and Sanctity in Late Sixteenth-Century Italy.” In Medicine and the Italian Universities (2001b), 356–80.Google Scholar
Siraisi, Nancy. History, Medicine, and the Traditions of Renaissance Learning. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Smith, Mark. “Producing Sense, Consuming Sense, Making Sense: Perils and Prospects for Sensory History.” Journal of Social History 40.4 (2007): 841–58.Google Scholar
Smith, Pamela. The Body of the Artisan: Art and Experience in the Scientific Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Smoller, Laura A. “Miracle, Memory, and Meaning in the Canonization of Vincent Ferrer, 1453–54.” Speculum 73.2 (1998): 429–54.Google Scholar
Spary, Emma. Eating the Enlightenment: Food and Sciences in Paris, 1670–1760. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Sterzi, Giuseppe. Giulio Casserio, anatomico e chirurgico (c. 1552–1616). Venice: Istituto Veneto di arti grafiche, 1909.Google Scholar
Stolberg, Michael. “Empiricism in Sixteenth-Century Medical Practice.” Early Science and Medicine 18.6 (2013a): 487–516.Google Scholar
Stolberg, Michael. “Examining the Body, c. 1500–1750.” In The Routledge History of Sex and the Body: 1500 to the Present, ed. Toulalan, Sarah and Fisher, Kate, 91–105. London: Routledge, 2013b.Google Scholar
Stolberg, Michael. “Bedside Teaching and the Acquisition of Practical Skills in Mid-Sixteenth-Century Padua.” Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences 69.4 (2014): 633–61.Google ScholarPubMed
Stolberg, Michael. Gelehrte Medizin und ärztlicher Alltag in der Renaissance. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2021.Google Scholar
Summers, David. The Judgment of Sense: Renaissance Naturalism and the Rise of Aesthetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Tullett, William. “State of the Field: Sensory History.” History: The Journal of the Historical Association 106.373 (December 2021): 804–20.Google Scholar
Tutino, Stefania. Shadows of Doubt: Language and Truth in Post-Reformation Catholic Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199324989.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tutino, Stefania. Uncertainty in Post-Reformation Catholicism: A History of Probabilism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Van der Eijk, Philip. “Galen on the Assessment of Bodily Mixtures.” In The Frontiers of Ancient Science: Essays in Honor of Heinrich von Staden, ed. Holmes, Brooke and Fischer, Klaus-Dietrich, 675–98. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2015.Google Scholar
Vauchez, André. La Sainteté en Occident aux derniers siècles du Moyen Age: D'après les procès de canonisation et les documents hagiographiques. Rome: École Française de Rome, 1988.Google Scholar
Vesalius, Andreas. Andreae Vesalii Bruxellensis, Scholae Medicorum Patavinae Professoris, de Humani Corporis Fabrica Libri Septem. Basel: Johannes Oporinus, 1543.Google Scholar
von Hoffmann, Viktoria. From Gluttony to Enlightenment: The World of Taste in Early Modern Europe. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2016.Google Scholar
von Hoffmann, Viktoria. “Ingeniosa peritia: The Languages of Ingenuity in Italian Renaissance Anatomy.” In Ingenuity in the Making: Matter and Technique in Early Modern Europe, ed. Oosterhoff, Richard J., Marcaida, José Ramón, and Marr, Alexander, 94–111. Pittsburgh, PA: Pittsburgh University Press, 2021.Google Scholar
Weber, Giorgio. “Introduzione.” In De Abditis Nonnullis (1994), 7–13.Google Scholar
Wragge-Morley, Alexander. Aesthetic Science: Representing Nature in the Royal Society of London, 1650–1720. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Joseph, Ziegler. “Practitioners and Saints: Medical Men in Canonization Processes in the Thirteenth to Fifteenth Centuries.” Social History of Medicine 12.2 (1999): 191–225.Google Scholar
Archivio Apostolico Vaticano (AAV), Vatican City, Congregatio Sacrorum Rituum Processus (Rit. Proc.) 762 (Andrea Corsini).Google Scholar
AAV, Rit. Proc. 2009 (Giacomo della Marca).Google Scholar
AAV, Rit. Proc. 2812 (Angelo del Pas).Google Scholar
AAV, Rit. Proc. 3156 (Teresa of Ávila).Google Scholar
Agrimi, Jole, and Crisciani, Chiara. “Per una Ricerca su Experimentum-Experimenta: Riflessione Epistemologica e Tradizione Medica (secoli XIII–XV).” In Presenza del Lessico Greco e Latino nelle Lingue Contemporanee, ed. Janni, Pietro and Mazzini, Innocenzo, 9–49. Macerata: Univeristà degli Studi di Macerata, 1990.Google Scholar
“AHR Forum: The Senses in History.” Special issue, American Historical Review 116.2 (April 2011): 307–400.Google Scholar
Andretta, Elisa. “Anatomie du Vénérable dans la Rome de la Contre-Réforme: Les autopsies d'Ignace de Loyola et de Philippe Neri.” In Conflicting Duties: Science, Medicine and Religion in Rome, 1550–1750, ed. Donato, Maria Pia and Kraye, Jill, 255–80. London: Warburg Institute; Turin: Nino Aragno Editore, 2009.Google Scholar
Andretta, Elisa. Roma Medica: Anatomie d'un système médical au XVIe siècle. Rome: École Française de Rome, 2011.Google Scholar
Bénatouïl, Thomas, and Draelants, Isabelle, eds. Expertus sum: L'expérience par les sens dans la philosophie naturelle médiévale. Florence: SISMEL Edizioni del Galuzzo, 2011.Google Scholar
Beneduce, Chiara. “Personalized Medicine and Complexio: ‘What is Human?’ as a Medical Question.” Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics 21.2 (2019): 89–98.Google Scholar
Bertoloni Meli, Domenico. Mechanism, Experiment, Disease: Marcello Malpighi and Seventeenth-Century Anatomy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Bertoloni Meli, Domenico, and Wilkin, Rebecca, eds. “Observation and Experiment in Mechanistic Anatomy.” Special issue, Early Science and Medicine 13.6 (2008): 531–709.10.1163/157338208X362679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bigotti, Fabrizio. Physiology of the Soul: Mind, Body and Matter in the Galenic Tradition of the Late Renaissance (1550–1630). Turnhout: Brepols, 2019.10.1484/M.DESCARTES-EB.5.116076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boddice, Rob, and Smith, Mark. Emotion, Sense, Experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020.Google Scholar
The Body as Object and Instrument of Knowledge: Embodied Empiricism in Early Modern Science. Ed. Charles T. Wolfe and Ofer Gal. Dordrecht: Springer, 2010.Google Scholar
The Body of Evidence: Corpses and Proofs in Early Modern European Medicine. Ed. Francesco P. De Ceglia. Leiden: Brill, 2020.Google Scholar
Boer, Weitse de, and Göttler, Christine, eds. Religion and the Senses in Early Modern Europe. Leiden: Brill, 2012.Google Scholar
Bouley, Bradford A. Pious Postmortems: Anatomy, Sanctity, and the Catholic Church in Early Modern Europe. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Bouvier, Michel. “De l'incorruptibilité des corps saints.” In Les Miracles, miroirs des corps, ed. Gélis, Jacques and Redon, Odile, 193–221. Paris: Presses et publications de l'Université de Paris VIII–Vincennes à Saint-Denis, 1983.Google Scholar
Breve Relatione della Vita, Miracoli, et Canonizatione della Gloriosa Vergine S. Teresa di Giesù Fondatrice de'Carmelitani Scalzi. Rome: Bartolomeo Zannetti, 1622.Google Scholar
Brill's Companion to the Reception of Galen. Ed. Petros Bouras-Vallianatos and Barbara Zipser. Leiden: Brill, 2019.Google Scholar
Burke, Peter. “How to Be a Counter-Reformation Saint.” In Religion and Society in Early Modern Europe 1500–1800, ed. von Greyerz, Kaspar, 45–55. London: German Historical Institute, 1984.Google Scholar
Bynum, Caroline Walker. “The Female Body and Religious Practice in the Later Middle Ages.” In Fragmentation and Redemption: Essays on Gender and the Human Body in Medieval Religion, ed. Bynum, Caroline Walker, 181–238. New York: Urzone Publishers, 1991.Google Scholar
Bynum, Caroline Walker. The Resurrection of the Body in Western Christianity, 200–1336. New York: Columbia University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Bynum, Caroline Walker. Christian Materiality: An Essay on Religion in Late Medieval Europe. New York: Zone Books, 2011.Google Scholar
Bynum, William F., and Porter, Roy, eds. Medicine and the Five Senses. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Canetti, Luigi. Frammenti di eternità: Corpi e reliquie tra antichità e medioevo. Rome: Viella, 2002.Google Scholar
Carlino, Andrea. “L'exception et la règle: A propos du XVe livre du De re anatomica de Realdo Colombo.” In Maladies, Médecines, et Sociétés: Approches historiques pour le présent; actes du VIe colloque d'Histoire au présent, 1:170–76. Paris: L'Harmattan Association “Histoire au présent,” 1993.Google Scholar
Carlino, Andrea. Books of the Body: Anatomical Ritual and Renaissance Learning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Carpi, Jacopo Berengario da. Carpi Commentaria cum Amplissimis Additionibus Super Anatomia Mundini. Bologna: Girolamo de’ Benedetti, 1521.Google Scholar
Carrillo-Rangel, David, Nieto-Isabel, Delfi I., and García, Pablo Acosta-, eds. Touching, Devotional Practices, and Visionary Experience in the Late Middle Ages. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019.Google Scholar
Casserius, Julius. De Vocis Auditusque Organis Historia Anatomica. Ferrara: Victorius Baldinus, n.d., ca. 1600.Google Scholar
Casserius, Julius. The Larynx, Organ of Voice by Julius Casserius. Ed. Hast, Malcolm H. and Holtsmark, Erling B.. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksells, 1969.Google Scholar
Cavallo, Sandra. Artisans of the Body in Early Modern Italy: Identities, Families and Masculinities. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Chandelier, Joël, and Robert, Aurélien. “Nature humaine et complexion du corps chez les médecins italiens de la fin du Moyen Âge.” Revue de Synthèse 134.4 (2013): 473–510.Google Scholar
Christofani, Federigo. Vita di S. Andreae Corsini Fiorentino dell'ordine carmelitano vescovo di Fiesole: Ràccolta dalla Vita Latina scritta da Monsignor Francesco Venturi Vescovo di S. Severo; Con gli atti della Canonizatione, e con la descrittione del Teatro. Rome: Bartolomeo Zannetti, 1629.Google Scholar
Ciappelli, Giovanni. Un Santo alla battaglia di Anghiari: La “vita” e il culto di Andrea Corsini nella Firenze del Rinascimento. Florence: SISMEL Edizioni del Galluzzo, 2007.Google Scholar
Classen, Constance. The Book of Touch. Oxford: Berg, 2005.Google Scholar
Classen, Constance. The Deepest Sense: A Cultural History of Touch. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Colombo, Realdo. De Re Anatomica Libri XV. Venice: Nicolai Bevilacquae, 1559.Google Scholar
Copeland, Clare. “Sanctity.” In The Ashgate Research Companion to the Counter-Reformation, ed. Bamji, Alexandra, Janssen, Geert H., and Laven, Mary, 225–42. London: Routledge, 2016.Google Scholar
Corbin, Alain. “Histoire et Anthropologie sensorielle.” Anthropologie et Sociétés 14.2 (1990): 13–24.Google Scholar
Crisciani, Chiara. “Fatti, teorie, ‘narration’ e malati a corte: Note su empirismo in medicine nel tardo-medioevo.” Quaderni storici 108.36.3 (December 2001): 695–718.Google Scholar
Cunningham, Andrew. The Anatomical Renaissance: The Resurrection of the Anatomical Projects of the Ancients. Aldershot: Scolar Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Cunsolo, Elisabetta. “Giulio Casserio e la pubblicazione del De Vocis Auditusque organis tra Padova e Ferrara all'inizio del ’600.” Mélanges de l’école française de Rome: Italie Méditerranée 120.2 (2008): 385–405.Google Scholar
Dacome, Lucia. Malleable Anatomies: Models, Makers, and Material Culture in Eighteenth-Century Italy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Daston, Lorraine. “Marvelous Facts and Miraculous Evidence in Early Modern Europe.” Critical Inquiry 18.1 (1991): 93–124.Google Scholar
Daston, Lorraine, and Park, Katharine. Wonders and the Order of Nature, 1150–1750. New York: Zone Books, 1998.Google Scholar
De Abditis Nonnullis ac Mirandis Morborum et Sanationum Causis. Antonio Benivieni. Ed. Giorgio Weber. Florence: Olschki, 1994.Google Scholar
Dear, Peter. Discipline and Experience: The Mathematical Way in the Scientific Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995.10.7208/chicago/9780226139524.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Ceglia, Francesco P. “Introduction: Corpses, Evidence and Medical Knowledge in the Late Middle Ages and the Early Modern Age.” In The Body of Evidence (2020), 1–20.Google Scholar
De Renzi, Silvia. “Witnesses of the Body: Medico-Legal Cases in Seventeenth-Century Rome.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 33.2 (2002): 219–42.10.1016/S0039-3681(02)00005-5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Renzi, Silvia. “Medical Competence, Anatomy and the Polity in Seventeenth-Century Rome.” Renaissance Studies 21.4 (2007): 551–67.Google ScholarPubMed
De Renzi, Silvia. “Per una biografia di Paolo Zacchia: Nuovi documenti e ipotesi di ricercar.” In Paolo Zacchia (2008), 50–73.Google Scholar
De Renzi, Silvia, Bresadola, Marco, and Conforti, Maria, eds. Pathology in Practice: Diseases and Dissections in Early Modern Europe. London: Routledge, 2018.Google Scholar
De Renzi, Silvia, and Conforti, Maria. “Sapere anatomico negli ospedali romani: Formazione dei chirurghi e pratiche sperimentali (1620–1720).” In Rome et la science moderne: Entre Renaissance et Lumières, ed. Romano, Antonella, 433–72. Rome: École Française de Rome, 2008.Google Scholar
Ditchfield, Simon. “How Not to Be a Counter-Reformation Saint: The Attempted Canonization of Pope Gregory X, 1622–45.” Papers of the British School at Rome 60 (1992): 379–422.10.1017/S0068246200009879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ditchfield, Simon. Liturgy, Sanctity and History in Tridentine Italy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Ditchfield, Simon. “Thinking with Saints: Sanctity and Society in the Early Modern World.” Critical Inquiry 35.3 (2009): 552–84.Google Scholar
Donato, Marie Pia. “Anatomia, autopsia, sectio: Problem di fonti e di metodo (secoli XVI–XVII).” In Anatome: Sezione, scomposizione, raffigurazione del corpo nell'età moderna, ed. Olmi, Giuseppe and Pancino, Claudia, 137–60. Bologna: Bononia University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Donato, Marie Pia. “Galen in an Age of Change (1650–1820).” In Brill's Companion to the Reception of Galen (2019), 487–507.Google Scholar
Duden, Barbara. The Woman Beneath the Skin: A Doctor's Patients in Eighteenth-Century Germany. Trans. Dunlap Thomas. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Duffin, Jacalyn. Medical Miracles: Doctors, Saints, and Healing in the Modern World. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Duffin, Jacalyn. “Questioning Medicine in Seventeenth-Century Rome: The Consultations of Paolo Zacchia.” Bulletin canadien d'histoire de la médecine / Canadian Bulletin of Medical History 28.1 (2011): 149–70.Google ScholarPubMed
Eamon, William. Science and the Secrets of Nature: Books of Secrets in Medieval and Early Modern Culture. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Fasciculus Medicinae. Venice: Giovanni de'Gregori, 1495.Google Scholar
Fortuna, Stefania. “The Latin Editions of Galen's Opera Omnia (1490–1625) and Their Prefaces.” Early Science and Medicine 17.4 (2012): 391–412.10.1163/1573382320120003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
French, Roger. “A Note on the Anatomical Accessus of the Middle Ages.” Medical History 23 (1979): 461–68.Google ScholarPubMed
French, Roger. “Berengario da Carpi and the Use of Commentary in Anatomical Teaching.” In The Medical Renaissance of the Sixteenth Century, ed. Wear, Andrew, French, Roger K., and Lonie, Iain M., 42–74. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
French, Roger. Dissection and Vivisection in the European Renaissance. Farnham: Ashgate, 1999.Google Scholar
Gadebusch Bondio, Mariacarla, ed. Die Hand: Elemente einer Medizin- und Kulturgeschichte. Berlin: Lit, 2010.Google Scholar
Galen of Pergamon. Works on Human Nature, Volume I: “Mixtures” (“De Temperamentis”). Ed. Singer, P. N. and Van der Eijk, Philip J., with Tassinari, Piero. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
García-Ballester, Luis. “The New Galen: A Challenge to Latin Galenism in Thirteenth-Century Montpellier.” In Text and Tradition: Studies in Ancient Medicine and Its Transmission; Presented to Jutta Kollesch, ed. Nickel, Klaus-Dietrich Fischer, Diethard, and Potter, Paul, 55–83. Leiden: Brill, 1998.Google Scholar
García-Ballester, Luis, French, Roger, Arrizabalaga, Jon, and Cunningham, Andrew, eds. Practical Medicine from Salerno to the Black Death. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Gentilcore, David. “Contesting Illness in Early Modern Naples: Miracolati, Physicians and the Congregation of Rites.” Past and Present 148 (1995): 117–48.Google Scholar
Gowing, Laura. Common Bodies: Women, Touch and Power in Seventeenth-Century England. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Green, Monica H. Making Women's Medicine Masculine: The Rise of Male Authority in Pre-Modern Gynaecology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Harvey, Elizabeth D. Sensible Flesh: On Touch in Early Modern Culture. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Harvey, Elizabeth D. “The Portal of Touch.” American Historical Review 116.2 (2011): 385–400.Google Scholar
Heller-Roazen, Daniel. The Inner Touch: Archaeology of a Sensation. New York: Zone Books, 2007.Google Scholar
Hendriksen, Marieke. Elegant Anatomy: The Eighteenth-Century Leiden Anatomical Collections. Leiden: Brill, 2015.Google Scholar
Heseler, Baldasar. Andreas Vesalius’ First Public Anatomy at Bologna 1540: An Eyewitness Report by Baldasar Heseler Medicinae Scolaris Together with His Notes on Matthaeus Curtius’ Lectures on Anatomia Mundini. Ed. Eriksson, Ruben. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksells, 1959.Google Scholar
Histories of Scientific Observation. Ed. Lorraine Daston and Elizabeth Lunbeck. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Howes, David, ed. Empire of the Senses: The Sensual Culture Reader. Oxford: Berg, 2005.Google Scholar
Howes, David. “Charting the Sensorial Revolution.” Senses and Society 1.1 (2006): 113–26.Google Scholar
“I cinque sensi / The Five Senses.” Special issue, Micrologus: Natura, scienze e società medievali 10 (2002).Google Scholar
Jacquart, Danielle. “De crasis à complexio: Note sur le vocabulaire du tempérament en latin médiéval.” In Textes médicaux latins antiques, ed. Sabbah, Guy, 71–76. Saint-Étienne: Publications de l'Université de Saint-Étienne, 1984.Google Scholar
Jacquart, Danielle. “La notion d’ingenium dans la médecine médiévale.” In Knowledge and the Sciences in Medieval Philosophy: Proceedings of the Eighth International Congress of Medieval Philosophy (S.I.E.P.M.), Helsinki, 24–29 August 1987, ed. Knuuttila, Simo, Työrinoja, Reijo, and Ebbesen, Sten, 2:62–70. Helsinki: Yliopistopaino, 1990.Google Scholar
Johnson, Geraldine. “Touch, Tactility, and the Reception of Sculpture in Early Modern Italy.” In A Companion to Art Theory, ed. Smith, Paul and Wilde, Carolyn, 61–74. Oxford: Blackwell, 2008.Google Scholar
Johnson, Geraldine. “Embodying Devotion: Multisensory Encounters with Donatello's Crucifix in S. Croce.” Renaissance Quarterly 73.4 (2020): 1179–234.Google Scholar
Jones, Lynette. Haptics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Jütte, Robert. A History of the Senses: From Antiquity to Cyberspace. Trans. James Lynn. Oxford: Polity, 2003.Google Scholar
Kambaskovic-Sawers, Danijela, and Wolfe, Charles T.. “The Senses in Philosophy and Science: From the Nobility of Sight to the Materialism of Touch.” In A Cultural History of the Senses in the Renaissance, ed. Roodenburg, Herman, 107–25. London: Bloomsbury, 2014.Google Scholar
Kaye, Joel. A History of Balance, 1250–1375: The Emergence of a New Model of Equilibrium and Its Impact on Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Klestinec, Cynthia. “Civility, Comportment, and the Anatomy Theater: Girolamo Fabrici and His Medical Students in Renaissance Padua.” Renaissance Quarterly 60.2 (2007): 434–63.Google ScholarPubMed
Klestinec, Cynthia. “Practical Experience in Anatomy.” In The Body as Object (2010), 33–57.Google Scholar
Klestinec, Cynthia. Theaters of Anatomy: Students, Teachers, and Traditions of Dissection in Renaissance Venice. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Klestinec, Cynthia. “Touch, Trust, and Compliance in Early Modern Medical Practice.” In The Edinburgh Companion to the Critical Medical Humanities, ed. Whitehead, Anne, Woods, Angela, Atkinson, Sarah, et al. , 209–24. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Kusukawa, Sachiko. Picturing the Book of Nature: Image, Text, and Argument in 16th-Century Human Anatomy and Medical Botany. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012.10.7208/chicago/9780226465289.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuuliala, Jenni. “Cure, Community, and the Miraculous in Early Modern Florence.” In Lived Religion and Everyday Life in Early Modern Hagiographic Material, ed. Kuuliala, Jenni, Peake, Rose-Marie, and Räisänen-Schröder, Päivi, 265–92. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019.Google Scholar
Kuuliala, Jenni. “The Saint as Medicator: Medicine and the Miraculous in Fifteenth- and Sixteenth-Century Italy.” Social History of Medicine 34.3 (2021): 703–22.Google ScholarPubMed
Lawrence, Christopher, and Shapin, Steven, eds. Science Incarnate: Historical Embodiments of Natural Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Lind, Levi Robert. Studies in Pre-Vesalian Anatomy: Biography, Translations, Documents. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society, 1975.Google Scholar
Long, Pamela. Artisan / Practitioners and the Rise of the New Sciences 1400–1600. Corvallis: Oregon State University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Maclean, Ian. Logic, Signs and Nature in the Renaissance: The Case of Learned Medicine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Mandressi, Rafael. Le regard de l'anatomiste: Dissections et invention du corps en Occident. Paris: Seuil, 2003.Google Scholar
Mandressi, Rafael. “De l’œil et du texte: Preuve, expérience et témoignage dans les ‘sciences du corps.’” Communications 84.1 (2009): 103–18.Google Scholar
Massa, Niccolò. Liber Introductorius Anatomiae, siue Dissectionis Corporis Humani. Venice, 1536.Google Scholar
Maurette, Pablo. “Touch, Hands, Kiss, Skin: Tactility in Early Modern Europe.” PhD diss., University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2013.Google Scholar
Maurette, Pablo. “Plato's Hermaphrodite and a Vindication of the Sense of Touch in the Sixteenth Century.” Renaissance Quarterly 68.3 (2015): 872–98.Google Scholar
Maurette, Pablo. The Forgotten Sense: Meditations on Touch. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2018a.Google Scholar
Maurette, Pablo. “The Organ of Organs: Vesalius and the Wonders of the Human Hand.” Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies 48.1 (2018b): 105–24.10.1215/10829636-4280873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McVaugh, Michael. “Galen in the Medieval Universities, 1200–1400.” In Brill's Companion to the Reception of Galen (2019), 381–92.Google Scholar
Medicine and the Italian Universities 1250–1600. Ed. Nancy Siraisi. Leiden: Brill, 2001.Google Scholar
Morrall, Andrew, Laven, Mary, and Ivanic, Suzanna, eds. Religious Materiality in the Early Modern World. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Moshenska, Joe. Feeling Pleasures: The Sense of Touch in Renaissance England. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Murphy, Hannah. “Skin and Disease in Early Modern Medicine: Jan Jessen's De cute, et cutaneis affectibus (1601).” Bulletin of the History of Medicine 94.2 (2020): 179–214.Google Scholar
Nutton, Vivian. “The Fortunes of Galen.” In The Cambridge Companion to Galen, ed. Hankinson, Robert J., 355–90. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Nutton, Vivian. “Renaissance Galenism, 1540–1640: Flexibility or an Increasing Irrelevance?” In Brill's Companion to the Reception of Galen (2019), 472–86.Google Scholar
O'Rourke Boyle, Marjorie. Senses of Touch: Human Dignity and Deformity from Michelangelo to Calvin. Leiden: Brill, 1998.Google Scholar
Papa, Giovanni. “La Sacra Congregazione dei Riti nel primo periodo di attività (1588–1624).” In Miscellanea in occasione del IV centenario della Congregazione per le Cause dei Santi (1588–1988), 13–52. Vatican City: Città del Vaticano, 1988.Google Scholar
Parisi, David. Archaeologies of Touch: Interfacing with Haptics from Electricity to Computing. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Park, Katharine. “The Criminal and the Saintly Body: Autopsy and Dissection in Renaissance Italy.” Renaissance Quarterly 47.1 (1994): 1–33.Google ScholarPubMed
Park, Katharine. Secrets of Women: Gender, Generation, and the Origins of Human Dissection. New York: Zone Books, 2006.Google Scholar
Park, Katharine. “Holy Autopsies: Saintly Bodies and Medical Expertise, 1300–1600.” In The Body in Early Modern Italy, ed. Hairston, Julia and Stephens, Walter, 61–73. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Park, Katharine. “Observation in the Margins, 500–1500.” In Histories of Scientific Observation (2011), 15–44.Google Scholar
Pastore, Alessandro, and Rossi, Giovanni, eds. Paolo Zacchia, 1584–1659: Alle origini della medicina legale. Milan: FrancoAngeli, 2008.Google Scholar
Paterson, Mark. The Senses of Touch: Haptics, Affects, and Technologies. Oxford: Berg, 2007.Google Scholar
“La pelle umana / The Human Skin.” Special issue, Micrologus: Natura, scienze e società medievali 13 (2005).Google Scholar
Pomata, Gianna. “Malpighi and the Holy Body: Medical Experts and Miraculous Evidence in Seventeenth-Century Italy.” Renaissance Studies 21.4 (2007): 568–86.Google Scholar
Pomata, Gianna. “Sharing Cases: The Observationes in Early Modern Medicine.” Early Science and Medicine 15.3 (2010): 193–236.Google ScholarPubMed
Pomata, Gianna. “Observation Rising: Birth of an Epistemic genre, ca. 1500–1650.” In Histories of Scientific Observation (2011), 45–80.Google Scholar
Pomata, Gianna. “The Medical Case Narrative: Distant Reading of an Epistemic Genre.” Literature and Medicine 32.1 (2014): 1–23.Google ScholarPubMed
Pomata, Gianna, and Siraisi, Nancy, eds. Historia: Empiricism and Erudition in Early Modern Europe. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Il primo processo per San Filippo Neri nel codice vaticano latino 3798 e in altri esemplari dell'Archivio dell'Oratorio di Roma, vol. 2. Ed. Incisa della Rocchetta. Vatican City: Biblioteca apostolica vaticana, 1958.Google Scholar
Quiviger, François. The Sensory World of Italian Renaissance Art. London: Reaktion Books, 2010.Google Scholar
Randolph, Adrian W. B. Touching Objects: Intimate Experiences of Italian Fifteenth-Century Art. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Reinarz, Jonathan, and Siena, Kevin, eds. A Medical History of Skin: Scratching the Surface. London: Pickering and Chatto, 2013.Google Scholar
Roberts, Lissa, Dear, Peter, and Schaffer, Simon, eds. The Mindful Hand: Inquiry and Invention from the Late Renaissance to Early Industrialization. Amsterdam: Koninkliijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, 2007.Google Scholar
Robinson, Kira. Healers in the Making: Students, Physicians, and Medical Education in Medieval Bologna (1250–1550). Leiden: Brill, 2020.Google Scholar
Rowe, Katherine. “‘God's Handy Worke’: Divine Complicity and the Anatomist's Touch.” In The Body in Parts: Fantasies of Corporeality in Early Modern Europe, ed. Hillman, David and Mazzio, Carla, 284–309. London: Routledge, 1997.Google Scholar
Rowe, Katherine. Dead Hands: Fictions of Agency, Renaissance to Modern. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Salmann, Jean-Michel. Naples et ses saints à l’âge baroque: 1540–1750. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1994.Google Scholar
Savoia, Paolo. Gaspare Tagliacozzi and Early Modern Surgery: Faces, Men, and Pain. London: Routledge, 2019.Google Scholar
Sawday, Jonathan. The Body Emblazoned: Dissection and the Human Body in Renaissance Culture. London: Routledge, 1996.Google Scholar
Shapin, Steven. A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Shapin, Steven, and Schaffer, Simon. Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Shotwell, Allen. “Animals, Pictures and Skeletons: Andreas Vesalius's Reinvention of the Public Anatomy Lesson.” Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences 71.1 (2016): 1–18.Google ScholarPubMed
Shotwell, Allen. “Dissection Techniques, Forensics and Anatomy in the 16th Century.” In The Body of Evidence (2020), 107–18.Google Scholar
Siraisi, Nancy. Taddeo Alderotti and His Pupils: Two Generations of Italian Medical Learning. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Siraisi, Nancy. “‘Remarkable’ Diseases, ‘Remarkable’ Cures, and Personal Experience in Renaissance Medical Texts.” In Medicine and the Italian Universities (2001a), 226–52.Google Scholar
Siraisi, Nancy. “Signs and Evidence: Autopsy and Sanctity in Late Sixteenth-Century Italy.” In Medicine and the Italian Universities (2001b), 356–80.Google Scholar
Siraisi, Nancy. History, Medicine, and the Traditions of Renaissance Learning. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Smith, Mark. “Producing Sense, Consuming Sense, Making Sense: Perils and Prospects for Sensory History.” Journal of Social History 40.4 (2007): 841–58.Google Scholar
Smith, Pamela. The Body of the Artisan: Art and Experience in the Scientific Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Smoller, Laura A. “Miracle, Memory, and Meaning in the Canonization of Vincent Ferrer, 1453–54.” Speculum 73.2 (1998): 429–54.Google Scholar
Spary, Emma. Eating the Enlightenment: Food and Sciences in Paris, 1670–1760. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Sterzi, Giuseppe. Giulio Casserio, anatomico e chirurgico (c. 1552–1616). Venice: Istituto Veneto di arti grafiche, 1909.Google Scholar
Stolberg, Michael. “Empiricism in Sixteenth-Century Medical Practice.” Early Science and Medicine 18.6 (2013a): 487–516.Google Scholar
Stolberg, Michael. “Examining the Body, c. 1500–1750.” In The Routledge History of Sex and the Body: 1500 to the Present, ed. Toulalan, Sarah and Fisher, Kate, 91–105. London: Routledge, 2013b.Google Scholar
Stolberg, Michael. “Bedside Teaching and the Acquisition of Practical Skills in Mid-Sixteenth-Century Padua.” Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences 69.4 (2014): 633–61.Google ScholarPubMed
Stolberg, Michael. Gelehrte Medizin und ärztlicher Alltag in der Renaissance. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2021.Google Scholar
Summers, David. The Judgment of Sense: Renaissance Naturalism and the Rise of Aesthetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Tullett, William. “State of the Field: Sensory History.” History: The Journal of the Historical Association 106.373 (December 2021): 804–20.Google Scholar
Tutino, Stefania. Shadows of Doubt: Language and Truth in Post-Reformation Catholic Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199324989.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tutino, Stefania. Uncertainty in Post-Reformation Catholicism: A History of Probabilism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Van der Eijk, Philip. “Galen on the Assessment of Bodily Mixtures.” In The Frontiers of Ancient Science: Essays in Honor of Heinrich von Staden, ed. Holmes, Brooke and Fischer, Klaus-Dietrich, 675–98. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2015.Google Scholar
Vauchez, André. La Sainteté en Occident aux derniers siècles du Moyen Age: D'après les procès de canonisation et les documents hagiographiques. Rome: École Française de Rome, 1988.Google Scholar
Vesalius, Andreas. Andreae Vesalii Bruxellensis, Scholae Medicorum Patavinae Professoris, de Humani Corporis Fabrica Libri Septem. Basel: Johannes Oporinus, 1543.Google Scholar
von Hoffmann, Viktoria. From Gluttony to Enlightenment: The World of Taste in Early Modern Europe. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2016.Google Scholar
von Hoffmann, Viktoria. “Ingeniosa peritia: The Languages of Ingenuity in Italian Renaissance Anatomy.” In Ingenuity in the Making: Matter and Technique in Early Modern Europe, ed. Oosterhoff, Richard J., Marcaida, José Ramón, and Marr, Alexander, 94–111. Pittsburgh, PA: Pittsburgh University Press, 2021.Google Scholar
Weber, Giorgio. “Introduzione.” In De Abditis Nonnullis (1994), 7–13.Google Scholar
Wragge-Morley, Alexander. Aesthetic Science: Representing Nature in the Royal Society of London, 1650–1720. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Joseph, Ziegler. “Practitioners and Saints: Medical Men in Canonization Processes in the Thirteenth to Fifteenth Centuries.” Social History of Medicine 12.2 (1999): 191–225.Google Scholar