Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T11:44:28.567Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Early Modern Play: Three Perspectives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Bret Rothstein
Bret Rothstein*
Affiliation:
Indiana University Bloomington
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Let us Draw on the past as we look toward the future. Specifically, let us begin with the Propositiones ad acuendos juvenes, or “Problems to Sharpen the Young,” by Alcuin of York. Written sometime in the later eighth century, this text offers a number of logical and mathematical problems meant, as the title suggests, to refine one’s intellect. Some of the problems are fairly straightforward, as in the case of a question about how many sheep might fit in a field measuring 200 × 100 feet, with each sheep being allocated a space of 5 × 4 feet. Others, like de porcis, are somewhat trickier. This latter example is an impossible puzzle that asks how one might slaughter 300 pigs in three days by only slaughtering an odd number on each of the days.

Type
Review Essay
Information
Renaissance Quarterly , Volume 71 , Issue 3 , Fall 2018 , pp. 1036 - 1046
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 Renaissance Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alcuin of York. “Problems to Sharpen the Young.” Ed. and trans. John Hadley and David Singmaster. The Mathematical Gazette 76.475 (1992): 102–26.10.2307/3620384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anchor, Robert. “History and Play: Johan Huizinga and His Critics.” History and Theory 17.1 (1978): 63–93.10.2307/2504901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arcangeli, Alessandro. Recreation in the Renaissance: Attitudes towards Leisure and Pastimes in European Culture, ca. 1425–1675. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003.10.1057/9780230507982CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ariès, Philippe, and Jean-Claude Margolin, eds. Les Jeux à la Renaissance: Actes du XXIIIe colloque international d’études humanistes, Tours–Juillet 1980. Paris: J. Vrin, 1982.Google Scholar
Bogost, Ian. “Why Gamification is Bullshit.” In The Gameful World: Approaches, Issues, Applications, ed. Steffen P. Walz and Sebastian Deterding, 65–79. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Burke, Peter. “The Invention of Leisure in Early Modern Europe.” Past & Present 146 (February 1995): 136–50.10.1093/past/146.1.136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caillois, Robert. Man Play, and Games. Trans. Meyer Barash. New York: Free Press, 1961.Google Scholar
Caillois, Robert. “Mimicry and Legendary Psychaesthenia.” Trans. John Shepley. October 31 (Winter 1984): 16–32.10.2307/778354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elias, Norbert, and Eric Dunning. Quest for Excitement: Sport and Leisure in the Civilizing Process. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1986.Google Scholar
Fink, Eugen. Play as Symbol of the World and Other Writings. Trans. Ian Alexander Moore and Christopher Turner. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Forsyth, Hazel, with Geoff Egan. Toys Trifles, and Trinkets: Base Metal Miniatures from London’s River Foreshore, 1150–1800. London: Unicorn Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Gombrich, Ernst H. “Huizinga’s Homo ludens.” BMGN—Low Countries Historical Review 88.2 (1973): 275–96.Google Scholar
Hamburger, Jeffrey H. “Speculations on Speculation: Vision and Perception in the Theory and Practice of Mystical Devotion.” In Deutsche Mystik in abendländischen Zusammenhang: Neue erschlossene Text, neue methodische Ansätze, neue theoretische Konzepte, ed. Walter Haug and Wolfram Schneider-Lastin, 353–407. Tübingen: Max Neimeyer, 2000.Google Scholar
Huizinga, Johan. Homo ludens: Proeve eener bepaling van het spel-element der cultuur (1940). In Verzamelde werken, ed. L. Brummel, W. R. Juynboll, and T. J. G. Locher, 5:26–246 (Cultuurgeschiedenis III). Haarlem: H. D. Tjeenk Willink & Zoon, 1950.Google Scholar
Murray, Harold James Ruthven. A History of Chess. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1913.Google Scholar
Pacioli, Luca. De viribus quantitatis. Ed. Maria Garlaschi Peirani and Augusto Marinoni. Milan: Raccolta Vinciana, 1997.Google Scholar
Passare il tempo: La letteratura del gioco e dell’intrattenimento dal XII al XVI secolo: Atti del Convegno di Pienza, 10–14 settembre 1991. Rome: Salerno, 1993.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand. “In Praise of Idleness.” Harper’s Monthly Magazine 165 (1 June 1932): 552–59.Google Scholar
Suits, Bernard. The Grasshopper: Games, Life, and Utopia. Rev. ed. Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Willemsen, Annemarieke. Kinder delijt: Middeleeuws speelgoed in de Nederlanden. Nijmegen: Nijmegen University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Philosophical Investigations. Trans. G. E. M. Anscombe. Rev. ed. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009.Google Scholar