Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T02:58:58.501Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Collapse of the Religious Hieroglyph: Typology and Natural Language in Herbert and Bacon*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Andrew M. Cooper
Andrew M. Cooper*
Affiliation:
University of Texas, Austin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Because rationalism and logocentrism have no eternal political essences, … they can be put to different political uses in different historical contexts. This is not to say that epistemological claims (or literary styles, or any other symbolic structures) are ideology-free and impervious to ideological analysis, only that the relation between the epistemological claim or other symbolic structure and the interests it serves is a contextual one that can change as the historical context changes.

Oscar Kenshur, “(Avoidable) Snares and Avoidable Muddles”

Type
Studies
Information
Renaissance Quarterly , Volume 45 , Issue 1 , Spring 1992 , pp. 96 - 118
Copyright
Copyright © Renaissance Society of America 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This essay is greatly indebted to the teaching of Martin Elsky and may be accurately considered as an extended footnote to chapter 5 of Authorizing Words: Speech, Writing, and Print in the English Renaissance.

References

Auerbach, Erich. Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature. Princeton, NJ, 1968.Google Scholar
Bacon, Francis. Works. Ed. James Spedding, Robert Leslie Ellis, Douglas Denon Heath. 7 vols. London, 1857.Google Scholar
Browne, Thomas. Religio Medici. Ed. Geoffrey Keynes. London, 1964.Google Scholar
Clark, Ira. Christ Revealed: The History of the Neotypological Lyric in the English Renaissance. Gainesville, FL, 1982.Google Scholar
Cohen, Murray. Sensible Words: Linguistic Practice in England, 1640-1785. Baltimore, 1977.Google Scholar
Coleridge, Samuel Taylor. The Friend. Ed. Barbara Rooke. 2 vols. Princeton, NJ, 1969.Google Scholar
Daniel, Stephen H. “Myth and the Grammar of Discovery in Francis Bacon.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 15 (1982): 219-37.Google Scholar
Davis, Walter R. “The Imagery of Bacon's Late Work.” In Seventeenth-Century Prose: Modern Essays in Criticism, ed. Stanley E. Fish, 239-50. New York, 1971.Google Scholar
Elsky, Martin. Authorizing Words: Speech, Writing, and Print in the English Renaissance. Ithaca, NY, 1989.Google Scholar
Elsky, Martin. “George Herbert's Pattern Poems and the Materiality of Language: A New Approach to Renaissance Hieroglyphics.” ELH 50 (1983): 245-60.Google Scholar
Fish, Stanley E. Self-Consuming Artifacts: The Experience of Seventeenth-Century Literature. Berkeley, 1972.Google Scholar
Fish, Stanley E. The Living Temple: George Herbert and Catechizing. Berkeley, 1978.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. New York, 1970.Google Scholar
Frei, Hans. The Eclipse of Biblical Narrative: A Study in Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centur Hermenentics. New Haven, 1973.Google Scholar
Gilman, Ernest B. Iconoclasm and Poetry in the English Reformation. Chicago, 1986.Google Scholar
Herbert, George. Works. Ed. F. E. Hutchinson. Oxford, Eng., 1954.Google Scholar
Kenshur, Oscar. “(Avoidable) Snares and Avoidable Muddles.” Critical Inquiry 15 (1989): 658-68.Google Scholar
Kenshur, Oscar. “Demystifying the Demystifiers: Metaphysical Snares of Ideological Criticism.” Critical Inquiry 14 (1988): 335-53.Google Scholar
Leishman, J. B. The Art of Marvell's Poetry. London, 1968.Google Scholar
Lewalski, Barbara. “Marvell as Religious Poet.” In Approaches to Marvell: The York Tercentenary Lectures, ed. C. A. Patrides, 251-79. Boston and London, 1978.Google Scholar
Marvell, Andrew. Poems and Letters. Ed. H. M. Margoliouth. 2 vols. New York, 1985.Google Scholar
Pequigney, Joseph. “Marvell's ‘Soul’ Poetry.“ Tercentenary Lectures in Honor of Andrew Marvell, ed. Kenneth Friedenreich, 76-104. Hamden, CT, 1977.Google Scholar
Rossi, Paolo. Francis Bacon: From Magic to Science. Trans. Sacha Rabinovitch. Chicago, 1968.Google Scholar
Sessions, William. “Bacon and Herbert and an Image of Chalk.” In “Too Rich to Clothe the Sunne“: Essays on George Herbert, ed. Claude J. Summers and Ted-Larry Pebworth, 165-78. Pittsburgh, 1980.Google Scholar
Sewell, Elizabeth. The Orphic Voice: Poetry and Natural History. New Haven, 1960.Google Scholar
Shullenburger, William. “Ars Praedicandi in George Herbert's Poetry.” In “Bright Shootes of Everlastingnesse“: The Seventeenth-Century Religious Lyric, ed. Claude J. Summers and Ted-Larry Pebworth, 96-115. Columbia, MO, 1987.Google Scholar
Strier, Richard. Love Known: Theology and Experience in George Herbert's Poetry. Chicago, 1983.Google Scholar
Summers, Joseph. George Herbert: His Religion and Art. New York, 1954.Google Scholar
Vaughan, Henry. Complete Poems. Ed. Alan Rudrum. New Haven, 1976.Google Scholar
Veith, Gene Edward. Reformation Spirituality: The Religion of George Herbert. London, 1985.Google Scholar
Vendler, Helen. The Poetry of George Herbert. Cambridge, MA, 1975.Google Scholar
Vickers, Brian. “The Royal Society and English Prose: A Reassessment.” In Rhetoric and the Pursuit of Truth: Language Change in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries. Los Angeles, 1985.Google Scholar
Wilkins, John. An Essay Towards a Real Character and a Philosophical Language. London, 1668.Google Scholar
Wittreich, Joseph. “ ‘In Copious Legend, or Sweet Lyric Song': Typology and the Perils of the Religious Lyric.” In “Bright Shootes of Everlastingnesse“: The Seventeenth-Cenlury Religious Lyric, ed. Claude J. Summers and Ted-Larry Pebworth, 192-215. Columbia, MO, 1987.Google Scholar