1 For Martial, see Timpanaro, Sebastiano, “Atlas cum comparegibbo,” Rinascimento, 2 (1951), 311–318 Google Scholar; now reprinted in Timpanaro's Contributi di filologia e di storia della lingua latina (Rome, 1978), pp. 333-343.

For Guilandinus, see Ferrari, G. E., “Le opere a stampa del Guilandino,” Libri e stampatori in Padova (Padua, 1959), pp. 377–463 Google Scholar; for Vitellius, E. Daxhelet, “Notes sur l'humaniste italien C. Vitelli,” Bulletin de l'institut historique Beige de Rome, 15 (1935), 83–97 Google Scholar; for Sabellicus, Carlo Dionisotti, Gli umanisti e it volgare fia quattro e cinquecento (Florence, 1968)Google Scholar and Gilbert, Felix, “Biondo, Sabellico, and the Beginnings of Venetian Official Historiography,” Florilegium Historiale: Essays Presented to Wallace K. Ferguson, ed. Rowe, J. G. and Stockdale, W. H. (Toronto, 1971), pp. 275–293 Google Scholar; for Brodaeus, Hutton, James, The Greek Anthology in France and in the Latin Writers of the Netherlands to the Year 1800 (Ithaca, N.Y., 1946), pp. 98–101 Google Scholar, with further references (Hutton challenges the year usually given for Brodaeus’ birth, 1500, which is accepted in the Catalogus, p. 276).

The bibliography for Erasmus, on p. 222, includes works by Seebohm and Smith that are now only of historical interest, mentions only one of Margolin's bibliographies of Erasmian studies, and omits precisely those recent secondary works that would be most helpful in giving a student an idea of Erasmus’ method as a translator and commentator.