Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T02:45:48.775Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Assumed Simplicity and the Critique of Nobility: Or, How Castiglione Read Cicero

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Jennifer Richards
Jennifer Richards*
Affiliation:
University of Newcastle Upon Tyne
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In book 1 of Castiglione's II libro del cortegiano Lodovico da Canossa's sprezzatura — embodied in his pretended inability to teach us how to be perfect courtiers — is usually seen as consonant with the treatise's aristocratic bias, especially among its Anglophone readers. In this essay, I argue that study of Cicero's use of dissimulatio — or “assumed simplicity“— in De oratore helps us to understand the importance of indirection as a critical tool. I apply this insight to Canossa's apparently conservative treatment of nobility, and show how his sprezzatura demystifies (rather than mystifies) the source of noble self-expression. Canossa's sprezzatura reveals how imitatio can replace heredity as a means to elite status.

Type
Studies
Information
Renaissance Quarterly , Volume 54 , Issue 2 , Summer 2001 , pp. 460 - 486
Copyright
Copyright © Renaissance Society of America 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ascham, Roger. 1974. The Schoolmaster. Ed. Lawrence V. Ryan. Charlottesville.Google Scholar
Baron, Hans. 1967. The Crisis of the Early Italian Renaissance: Civic Humanism and Republican Liberty in the Age of Classicism and Tyranny. 1955. Reprint, Princeton.Google Scholar
Ascham, Roger. 1989. In Search of Florentine Civic Humanism: Essays on the Transition from Medieval to Modern Thought. 2 vols. 1988. Reprint, Princeton.Google Scholar
Burke, Peter. 1995. The Fortunes of the “Courtier“: The European Reception of Castiglione's “Cortegiano.” Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bryson, Anna. 1998. From Courtesy to Civility: Changing Codes of Conduct in Early Modern England. Oxford.Google Scholar
Casa, Giovanni della. 1576. Galateo of Master John Della Casa. Google Scholar
Castiglione, Baldassare. 1571. Balthasaris Castilionis comitis De curiali sive aulico libri quatuor ex italico sermone in latinum conversi. Trans. Bartholomew Clerke. London.Google Scholar
Castiglione, Baldassare. 1947. Il libro del Cortegiano. Ed. Vittorio Cian. Florence.Google Scholar
Castiglione, Baldassare. 1994. The Book of the Courtier. Trans. Thomas Hoby. Ed. Virginia Cox. London, Vermont.Google Scholar
Cian, Vittorio. 1951. Un Illustre Nunzio Pontificio Del Rinascimento Baldassar Castiglione. Vatican.Google Scholar
Cicero, . 1556. Marcus Tullius Ciceroes thre bokes of duties, turned oute of Latine by N: Grimalde. Trans. Nicholas Grimaid. London.Google Scholar
Cicero, . 1988. De oratore, 2 vols. Trans. E.W. Sutton. 1942. Reprint, Cambridge, MA, and London.Google Scholar
Cicero, . 1927. Tusculan Disputations. Trans. J.E. King. London and New York.Google Scholar
Cicero, . 1939. Brutus, Orator. Trans. H.M. Hubbell. London and Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Cicero, . 1947. De officiis. Trans. Walter Miller. London and New York.Google Scholar
Clarke, M. L. 1953. Rhetoric at Rome: A Historical Survey. London.Google Scholar
Cox, Virginia. 1992. The Renaissance Dialogue: Literary Dialogue in its Social and Political Contexts, Castiglione to Galileo. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Crane, Mary Thomas. 1993. Framing Authority: Sayings, Self and Society in Sixteenth-Century England. Princeton.Google Scholar
Ferroni, Giulio. 1980. ‘“Sprezzaturd e Simulazione,” La Corte e il Cortegiano (I). Ed. Carlo Ossola, 119-147. Rome.Google Scholar
Gagliardi, Antonio. 1989. “La Misura e La Grazia sul Libro del Cortegiano,” Tirrenia Stampatori.Google Scholar
Garin, Eugenio. 1965. Italian Humanism: Philosophy and Civic Life in the Renaissance. Trans. Peter Munz. 1947. Reprint, Oxford.Google Scholar
Garin, Eugenio, ed. 1952. Prosatori latini del Quattrocento. Milan and Naples.Google Scholar
Gray, Hanna H. 1963. “Renaissance Humanism: The Pursuit of Eloquence.“ Journal of the History of Ideas 24: 497- 514.Google Scholar
Greene, Thomas M. 1982. The Light in Troy: Imitation and Discovery in Renaissance Poetry. New Haven.Google Scholar
Greene, Thomas M. 1983. “Il Cortegiano and the Choice of a Game.” In Castiglione: The Ideal and the Real in Renaissance Culture, eds. Hanning and Rosand. 1- 15. New Haven.Google Scholar
Grube, G. M. A. 1968. The Greek and Roman Critics. London.Google Scholar
Hanning, Robert W., and David Rosand, eds. 1983. Castiglione: The Ideal and the Real in Renaissance Culture. New Haven.Google Scholar
Harvey, Gabriel. 1884. Letter-Book of Gabriel Harvey, AD 1573-1580. Ed. Edward John Long Scott. Westminister.Google Scholar
Hoby, Thomas. 1902. The Travels and Life of Sir Thomas Hoby. Ed. Edgar Powell. London.Google Scholar
Javitch, Daniel. 1971. “Rival Arts of Conduct in Elizabethan England: Guazzo's Civile Conversation and Castiglione's Courtier.” Yearbook of Italian Studies: 178-98.Google Scholar
Javitch, Daniel. 1978. Poetry and Courtliness in Renaissance England. Princeton.Google Scholar
Javitch, Daniel. 1982. “The Impure Motives of Poetry.” Genre 15: 225–38.Google Scholar
Javitch, Daniel. 1983.“Il cortegiano and the Constraints of Despotism.” In Castiglione: The Ideal and the Real, eds. Hanning and Rosand, 17-28. New Haven.Google Scholar
Jones, Howard. 1998. Master Tully. Cicero in Tudor England. Nieuwkoop.Google Scholar
Kahn, Victoria. 1985. Rhetoric, Prudence and Skepticism in the Renaissance. Ithaca.Google Scholar
Kennedy, George. 1972. The Art of Rhetoric in the Roman World, 300 B.C. A.D. 300. Princeton.Google Scholar
Kristeller, Paul Oskar. 1955. The Classic and Renaissance Thought. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Kristeller, Paul Oskar. 1956-1996. “Humanism and Scholasticism in Renaissance Italy.” In Studies in Renaissance Thought and Letters, vol. 3, 553-83. Rome.Google Scholar
Lanham, Richard. 1976. The Motives of Eloquence: Literary Rhetoric in the Renaissance. New Haven.Google Scholar
Marsh, David. 1980. The Quattrocento Dialogue: Classical Tradition and Humanist Innovation. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Martines, Lauro. 1979. Power and Imagination: City-States in Renaissance Italy. New York.Google Scholar
Mason, John E. 1971. Gentlefolk in the Making: Studies in the History of English Courtesy Literature and Related Topics from 1531 to 1774. New York.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, F.O. 1931. Translation: An Elizabethan Art. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Monk, Samuel Holt. 1944. “A Grace Beyond the Reach of Art.” Journal of the History of Ideas 5: 131–50.Google Scholar
Moss, Ann. 1996. Printed Commonplace- Books and the Structuring of Renaissance Thought. Oxford.Google Scholar
Peltonen, Markku. 1995. Classical Humanism and Republicanism in English Political Thought, 1570-1640. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Petrarca, Francesco. 1955. Prose. Ed. Guido Martellotti. Milan and Naples.Google Scholar
Pigman, G.W. 1980. “Versions of Imitation in the Renaissance.” Renaissance Quarterly 33:1 -32.Google Scholar
Plato. 1977. Euthyphro, Apology, Crito, Phaedo, Phaedrus. Trans. Harold North Fowler. 1914. Reprint, Cambridge MA, London.Google Scholar
Plett, Heinrich F. 1983. “Aesthetic Constituents in the Courtly Culture of Renaissance England,” New Literary History 14: 597–621.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. 1975. The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition. Princeton.Google Scholar
Quint, David. 1985. “Humanism and Modernity: A Reconsideration of Bruni's Dialogues.” Renaissance Quarterly 38: 423–45.Google Scholar
Quintilian. 1963. The Institutio Oratoria of Quintilian. Trans. H.E. Butler. 4 vols. London, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Saccone, Eduardo. 1983. “Grazia, Sprezzatura, Affettazione in the Courtier.” In Castiglione: The Ideal and the Real in Renaissance Culture. Eds. Hanning and Rosand, 45-67. New Haven.Google Scholar
Seigel, Jerrold E. 1966. ‘“Civic Humanism’ or Ciceronian Rhetoric? The Culture of Petrarch and Bruni.” Past and Present 34: 3–48.Google Scholar
Seigel, Jerrold E. 1968. Rhetoric and Philosophy in Renaissance Humanism: The Union of Eloquence and Wisdom, Petrarch to Valla. Princeton.Google Scholar
Sherman, William. 1995. John Dee: The Politics of Reading and Writing in the English Renaissance. Amherst.Google Scholar
Shorey, Paul. 1909. “Physis, melete, epistem.” Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 40: 185–201.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. 1996. The Foundation of Modern Political Thought. Vol. 1. The Renaissance. 1978. Reprint, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Stewart, Alan. 1997. Close Readers: Humanism and Sodomy in Early Modern England. Princeton.Google Scholar
Thompson, David, and Alan F. Nagel. 1972. The Three Crowns of Florence: Humanist Assessments of Dante, Petrarca and Boccaccio. New York, San Francisco, and London.Google Scholar
Trafton, Dain. 1972. “Structure and Meaning in The Courtier!“English Literary Renaissance 2: 283-97.Google Scholar
Vickers, Brian. 1988. In Defence of Rhetoric. Oxford.Google Scholar
Vincent, Eric Reginald. 1967. “II “Cortegiano” in Inghilterra.” Rinascimento Europeo e Rinascimento Veneziano, ed. Vittore Branca. 97-108. Sansoni.Google Scholar
Whigham, Frank. 1983. “Interpretation at Court: Courtesy and the Performer-Audience Dialectic.” New Literary History 14: 623–40.Google Scholar
Whigham, Frank. 1984. Ambition and Privilege: The Social Tropes of Elizabethan Courtesy Theory. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Woodhouse, J. R. 1978. Baldasar Castiglione“: A reassessment of “The Courtier. “Edinburgh.Google Scholar