Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-5mhkq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-20T07:05:21.088Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Wherefore Art Thou Tereu? Juliet and the Legacy of Rape

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Robert N. Watson  and
Stephen Dickey
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Commentators on Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet — perhaps mesmerized by the play’s reputation as an exemplar of pure love — have overlooked its references to the most notorious rapists of classical culture: Tereus, Hades, Tarquin, and Paris. Our point is not to accuse Romeo, but instead to demonstrate that Shakespeare characteristically hints at crimes that only flicker through the minds of potential perpetrators and victims, who must draw on a collective cultural legacy to judge, articulate, and control those possibilities. Reducing the play’s spectrum of sexual aggression (including voyeurism, insincere seduction, displaced phallic violence, angry possessiveness, and forced marriage) into a neat binary of rape and consent may be socially desirable, but it erases the ethical and psychological complexity of adolescent courtship. Ignoring the ancient specter of rape haunting this story also precludes recognizing what Juliet does heroically to exorcise it.

Type
Research Article
Information
Renaissance Quarterly , Volume 58 , Issue 1 , Spring 2005 , pp. 127 - 156
Copyright
Copyright © 2005 Renaissance Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Robert, Appelbaum. “’Standing to the wall’: The Pressures of Masculinity in Romeo and Juliet.” Shakespeare Quarterly 48 1997 : 251 – 72 Google Scholar
Aristotle’s Master-Piece. London, 1595.Google Scholar
Barbara, Baines. “Effacing Rape in Early Modern Representation.” English Literary History 65. 1 1998 : 69 – 98 Google Scholar
Bal, Mieke. “The Rape of Lucrece and the Story of W.” In Reclamations of Shakespeare, ed. Hoenselaars, A.J., 75–104. Amsterdam, 1994.Google Scholar
Bamford, Karen. Sexual Violence on the Jacobean Stage. New York, 2000.Google Scholar
Leonard, Barkan. “Diana and Actaeon: The Myth as Synthesis.” English Literary Renaissance 10 1980 : 317 – 59 Google Scholar
Barton, John. Playing Shakespeare. London, 1984.Google Scholar
Bashar, Nazife. “Rape in England between 1550 and 1700.” In The Sexual Dynamics of History: Men’s Power, Women’s Resistance, ed. The London Feminist History Group, 28–42. London, 1983.Google Scholar
Bate, Jonathan. Shakespeare and Ovid. Oxford, 1993.Google Scholar
Catherine, Belsey. “Tarquin Dispossessed: Expropriation and Consent in The Rape of Lucrece.” Shakespeare Quarterly 52 2001 : 315 – 35 Google Scholar
Brathwait, Richard. The English gentleman and the English gentlewoman. 3rd ed. London, 1641.Google Scholar
Brooke, Arthur. The Tragicall Historye of Romeus and Juliet. In Bullough, ed., 1:284–363.Google Scholar
Bullough, Geoffrey., ed Narrative and Dramatic Sources of Shakespeare. 8 vols. London, 1957.Google Scholar
Deborah G, Burks “’I’ll Want My Will Else’: The Changeling and Women’s Complicity with the Rapists.” English Literary History 62 1995 : 759 – 90 Google Scholar
Catty, Jocelyn. Writing Rape, Writing Women in Early Modern England: Unbridled Speech. New York, 1999.Google Scholar
Chettle, Henry. England’s Mourning Garment. London, 1603.Google Scholar
Coke, Edward. The Institutes of the Laws of England. London, 1644.Google Scholar
Leo C, Curran. “Rape and Rape Victims in The Metamorphoses.” Arethusa 11 1978 : 213 – 39 Google Scholar
Dalton, Michael. The Countrey Justice. London, 1618.Google Scholar
D’Avenant, William. The cruell brother. London, 1630.Google Scholar
Emily, Detmer-Goebel. “The Need for Lavinia’s Voice: Titus Andronicus and the Telling of Rape.” Shakespeare Studies 29 2001 : 75 – 92 Google Scholar
Donne, John. The Major Works. Ed. John Carey. New York and Oxford, 1990.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Andrea. Intercourse. New York, 1997.Google Scholar
Evans, G.B., ed. Romeo and Juliet.2nd ed. Cambridge, 2003.Google Scholar
Evans, Maurice., ed Elizabethan Sonnets. London, 1977.Google Scholar
Farrell, Kirby. Play, Death, and Heroism in Shakespeare. Chapel Hill, 1989.Google Scholar
Ford, John. Loves sacrifice. London, 1633.Google Scholar
Golding, Arthur. Ovid’s Metamorphoses. 1567. Ed. Nims, John Frederick. Philadelphia, 2000.Google Scholar
Gorges, Arthur. Lucans Pharsalia. London, 1614.Google Scholar
Suzanne, Gossett. “’Best Men Are Molded Out of Faults’: Marrying the Rapist in Jacobean Drama.” English Literary Renaissance 14 1984 : 305 – 27 Google Scholar
Helms, Lorraine. Seneca by Candlelight and Other Stories of Renaissance Drama. Philadelphia, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Richard. The seven Champions of Christendome. Part 1. London, 1608.Google Scholar
Jones, Emrys. The Origins of Shakespeare. Oxford, 1977.Google Scholar
Kahn, Coppélia. “Coming of Age in Verona.” In The Woman’s Part (1980), 171–93.Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, Mary R. “Seduction and Rape in Greek Myth.” In Consent and Coercion to Sex and Marriage in Ancient and Medieval Societies, ed. Laiou, Angeliki E., 17–37. Washington, D. C., 1993.Google Scholar
Levenson, Jill L., ed. Romeo and Juliet. Oxford, 2000.Google Scholar
Livy, Titus. The History of Rome.Google Scholar
Loves martyr. London, 1601.Google Scholar
Lyly, John. Campaspe. Ed. G.K. Hunter. Manchester, 1991.Google Scholar
Mead, Robert. The Combat of Love and Friendship. London, 1654.Google Scholar
Middleton, Thomas, and Rowley, William. The Changeling. Ed. Williams, George Walton. London, 1967.Google Scholar
Porter, Joseph. Shakespeare’s Mercutio: His History and Drama. Chapel Hill, 1988.Google Scholar
The Puritan. London, 1607.Google Scholar
Quarles, John. Tarquin Banished: or, the Reward of Lust. London, 1655.Google Scholar
Sid, Ray. “’Rape, I fear, was root of thy annoy’: The Politics of Consent in Titus Andronicus.” Shakespeare Quarterly 49 1998 : 22 – 39 Google Scholar
Rivers, George. The Heroinæ. London, 1639.Google Scholar
Romeo and Juliet. Videocassette. Directed by Franco Zeffirelli. 1968; Paramount: Hollywood, CA, 2003.Google Scholar
Saunders, Corinne. Rape and Ravishment in the Literature of Medieval England. Rochester, NY, 2001.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. The Riverside Shakespeare. Ed. G. Blakemore Evans et al. 2nd ed. Boston, 1997.Google Scholar
Snow, Edward. “Language and Sexual Difference in Romeo and Juliet.” In Shakespeare’s Rough Magic, ed. Erickson, Peter and Kahn, Coppélia, 168–92. Newark, DE, 1985.Google Scholar
Stimpson, Catharine. “Shakespeare and the Soil of Rape.” In The Woman’s Part (1980), 50–64.Google Scholar
Tourneur, Cyril. The Atheist’s Tragedie. Ed. Irving Ribner. Cambridge, MA, 1964.Google Scholar
Turberville, George. The Heroycall Epistles of. .. Publius Ovidius Naso. London, 1567.Google Scholar
Robert N, Watson. “As You Liken It: Simile in the Wilderness.” Shakespeare Survey 56 2003 : 79 – 92 Google Scholar
Carolyn D, Williams. “’Silence, like a Lucrece knife.’” Yearbook of English Studies 23 1993 : 93 – 110 Google Scholar
Wolfthal, Diane. Images of Rape: The “Heroic” Tradition and its Alternatives. New York, 1999.Google Scholar
The Woman’s Part: Feminist Criticism of Shakespeare. Ed. Ruth Swift Lenz, Gayle Greene, and Carol Thomas Neely. Urbana: 1980.Google Scholar