Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T02:50:57.411Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What’s Hecuba to Shakespeare?*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Tanya Pollard
Tanya Pollard*
Affiliation:
The City University of New York, Brooklyn College and The Graduate Center
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

When Hamlet reflects on the charged power of the tragic theater, the figure who haunts his imagination is Hecuba, Queen of Troy, whose tragedy came to define the genre in sixteenth-century Europe. As a bereaved mourner who seeks revenge, Hecuba offers a female version of Hamlet. Yet even while underscoring her tragic power, Shakespeare simultaneously establishes a new model of tragic protagonist, challenging the period’s longstanding identification of tragedy with women. In exploring why both Hamlet and Shakespeare are preoccupied with Hecuba, this article argues that ignoring the impact of Greek plays in sixteenth-century England has left a gap in our understanding of early modern tragedy. Attending to Hecuba highlights Shakespeare’s innovations to a genre conventionally centered on female grief. In invoking Hecuba as an icon of tragedy, Shakespeare both reflects on and transforms women’s place in the genre.

Type
Studies
Information
Renaissance Quarterly , Volume 65 , Issue 4 , Winter 2012 , pp. 1060 - 1093
Copyright
Copyright © 2012 Renaissance Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

For comments on earlier versions of this essay, I am grateful to Bianca Calabresi, Katharine Craik, Julie Crawford, Natasha Korda, Lucy Munro, Nancy Selleck, William Stenhouse, and Oliver Taplin. I am grateful to Melina Moore for help with editing and formatting. Unless otherwise noted, all translations are my own.

References

Adelman, Janet. Suffocating Mothers. New York, 1992.Google Scholar
Alexiou, Margaret. The Ritual Lament in Greek Tradition. Cambridge, 1974.Google Scholar
APGRD Database, University of Oxford, http://www.apgrd.ox.ac.uk/database(accessed 29 March 2011).Google Scholar
Ascham, Roger. The Scholemaster. London, 1571.Google Scholar
Bacon, Francis. “Of Revenge.” In The Philosophical Works of Francis Bacon, ed., Robertson, John M., 740. New York, 1970.Google Scholar
Baldwin, T. W. William Shakspere’s Small Latine and Lesse Greeke. 2 vols. Urbana, 1944.Google Scholar
Bamber, Linda. Comic Women, Tragic Men: A Study of Gender and Genre in Shakespeare. Stanford, 1982.Google Scholar
Bate, Jonathan. Shakespeare and Ovid. Oxford, 1993.Google Scholar
Billing, Christian M. “Lament and Revenge in the Hekabe of Euripides.” New Theatre Quarterly 23.1 ( 2007 ): 49 – 57.10.1017/S0266464X06000625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blundell, M. Whitlock. Helping Friends and Harming Enemies. Cambridge, 1989.10.1017/CBO9780511586170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolgar, R. R. The Classical Heritage and its Beneficiaries. Cambridge, 1954.10.1017/CBO9780511583735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braden, Gordon. Renaissance Tragedy and the Senecan Tradition. New Haven, 1985.Google Scholar
Brown, Pamela Allen. “The Counterfeit Innamorata, or, The Diva Vanishes.” Shakespeare Yearbook 10 ( 1999 ): 402 – 26.Google Scholar
Burnett, Anne Pippin. Revenge in Attic and Later Tragedy. Berkeley, 1998.Google Scholar
Bushnell, Rebecca. Tragedy and Tyrants. Ithaca, 1990.Google Scholar
The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism. Ed. Norton, Glyn. 9 vols. Cambridge, 1989 – 2001.Google Scholar
Castelvetro. On the Poetics. Trans. Allen Gilbert. In Literary Criticism ( 1940 ), 305 – 57.Google Scholar
Castelvetro. Castelvetro on the Art of Poetry. Ed. and trans. Bongiorno, Andrew. Binghamton, 1984.Google Scholar
Child, Harold. “Introduction.” In Iphigenia in Aulis ( 1909 ), v–vii.Google Scholar
Cinthio, Giraldi. On the Composition of Comedies and Tragedies. Trans. Allen Gilbert. In Literary Criticism ( 1940 ), 252 – 62.Google Scholar
Cooper, Lane. The Poetics of Aristotle. Ithaca, 1923.Google Scholar
Crane, Frank D. “Euripides, Erasmus, and Lady Lumley.” The Classical Journal 39.4 ( 1944 ): 223 – 28.Google Scholar
Crane, Mary Thomas. “Male Pregnancy and Cognitive Permeability in Measure for Measure.” Shakespeare Quarterly 49.3 ( 1998 ): 269 – 92.10.2307/2902259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronk, Nicholas. “Aristotle, Horace, and Longinus: The Conception of Reader Response.” In The Cambridge History ( 1999 ), 3 : 199 – 204.Google Scholar
Cunliffe, John W. “The Influence of the Italian on Early Elizabethan Drama.” Modern Philology 4 ( 1907a ): 597 – 604.10.1086/386722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunliffe, John W. “Italian Prototypes of the Masque and Dumb Show.” Publications of the Modern Language Association 22 ( 1907b ): 140 – 56.10.2307/456663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demers, Patricia. “On First Looking into Lumley’s Euripides.” Renaissance and Reformation 23.1 ( 1999 ): 25 – 42.Google Scholar
Demetriou, Tania. “‘Essentially Circe’: Spenser, Homer, and the Homeric Tradition.” Translation and Literature 15.2 ( 2006 ): 151 – 76.Google Scholar
Dewar-Watson, Sarah. “Shakespeare’s Dramatic Odysseys: Homer as a Tragicomic Model in Pericles and The Tempest.” Classical and Modern Literature 25.1 ( 2005 ): 23 – 40.Google Scholar
Dewar-Watson, Sarah. “The Alcestis and the Statue Scene in The Winter’s Tale.” Shakespeare Quarterly 60.1 ( 2009 ): 73 – 80.10.1353/shq.0.0057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewar-Watson, Sarah “Jocasta: ‘A Tragedie Written in Greek.’” International Journal of the Classical Tradition 17.1 ( 2010 ): 22 – 32.10.1007/s12138-010-0163-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolce, Lodovico. Giocasta. Venice, 1549.Google Scholar
Dunn, Leslie C. “Ophelia’s Songs in Hamlet: Music, Madness, and the Feminine.” In Embodied Voices: Representing Female Vocality in Western Culture, ed., Dunn, Leslie C. and, Jones, Nancy A., 50 – 64. Cambridge, 1994.Google Scholar
Early English Classical Tragedies. Ed. Cunliffe, John W.. Oxford, 1912.Google Scholar
Enterline, Lynn. The Rhetoric of the Body from Ovid to Shakespeare. Cambridge, 2000.10.1017/CBO9780511483561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erne, Lukas. Beyond The Spanish Tragedy: A Study of the Works of Thomas Kyd. Manchester, 2001.Google Scholar
Euripides. Iphigenia Aulidensis . In Euripidis Fabulae ( 1984–94 ), 3 : 357 – 421.Google Scholar
Euripides. Hecuba . In Euripidis Fabulae ( 1984–94 ), 1 : 333 – 98.Google Scholar
Euripides. Medea . In Euripidis Fabulae ( 1984–94 ), 1 : 85 – 155.Google Scholar
Euripides. Phoenissae . In Euripidis Fabulae ( 1984–94 ), 3 : 71 – 179.Google Scholar
Euripidis Fabulae . Ed. Diggle, James. 3 vols. Oxford, 1984 – 94.Google Scholar
Euripidis … Tragoediae XVIII. Basel, 1541.Google Scholar
Εύριπδου ΤραΥωδίαι … Evripidis tragoediae dvae, Hercuba & Iphigenia in Aulide. Trans. Desiderius Erasmus. Basel, 1524.Google Scholar
Farley-Hills, David. Shakespeare and the Rival Playwrights 1600–1606. London, 1990.10.4324/9780203325063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Female Tragic Hero in Renaissance Drama. Ed. Naomi Conn Liebler. New York, 2002.Google Scholar
Fienberg, Nona. “Jephthah’s Daughter: The Part Ophelia Plays.” In Old Testament Women in Western Literature, ed., Frontain, Raymond-Jean and, Wojcik, Jon, 128 – 43. Conway, 1991.Google Scholar
Foakes, R. A. “Tragedy at the Children’s Theatres after 1600: A Challenge to the Adult Stage.” In The Elizabethan Theatre II, ed., Galloway, David, 37 – 59. Toronto, 1970.Google Scholar
Foakes, R. A, ed. Henslowe’s Diary. 2nd ed. Cambridge, 2002.Google Scholar
Foley, Helene P. Female Acts in Greek Tragedy. Princeton, 2001.Google Scholar
Fox-Good, Jacquelyn. “Ophelia’s Mad Songs: Music, Gender, Power.” In Subjects on the World’s Stage: Essays on British Literature of the Middle Ages and the Renaissance, ed., Allen, David C. and, White, Robert A., 217 – 38. Newark, 1995.Google Scholar
Freeman, James. “Hamlet, Hecuba, and Plutarch.” Shakespeare Studies 7 ( 1974 ): 197 – 202.Google Scholar
Garland, Robert. Surviving Tragedy. London, 2004.Google Scholar
Gascoigne, George, and, Francis, Kinwelmersh. Jocasta . In Early English Classical Tragedies ( 1912 ), 67 – 159.Google Scholar
Gaunt, D. M. “Hamlet and Hecuba.” Notes and Queries 16.4 ( 1969 ): 136 – 37.Google Scholar
Goldhill, Simon. Reading Greek Tragedy. Cambridge, 1986.10.1017/CBO9780511627354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomme, A. W. “The Position of Women in Classical Athens.” Classical Philology 20.1 ( 1925 ): 1 – 25.Google Scholar
Goodland, Katharine. Female Mourning in Medieval and Renaissance English Drama. Aldershot, 2006.Google Scholar
Gosson, Stephen. “Plays Confuted in Five Actions.” In Shakespeare’s Theater ( 2004 ), 84 – 114.10.1002/9780470752975.ch6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, John. “Tragedy and Collective Experience.” In Tragedy and the Tragic ( 1996 ), 217 – 43.Google Scholar
Gourlay, Patricia. “Guilty Creatures Sitting at a Play: A Note on Hamlet, Act II, Scene 2.” Renaissance Quarterly 24.2 ( 1971 ): 221 – 25.10.2307/2859198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grabes, Herbert. The Mutable Glass. Trans. Gordon Collier. Cambridge, 1982.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Marissa. “Women and the Theater in Thomas Heywood’s London.” In The Idea of the City: Early-Modern, Modern and Post-Modern Locations and Communities, ed., Fitzpatrick, Joan, 79 – 89. Newcastle, 2009.Google Scholar
Gross, Kenneth. Shakespeare’s Noise. Chicago, 2001.Google Scholar
Heath, Malcolm. “‘Jure principem locum tenet’: Euripides’ Hecuba.” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 34 ( 1987 ): 40 – 68.10.1111/j.2041-5370.1987.tb00553.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrick, Marvin T. Tragicomedy: Its Origin and Development in Italy, France, and England. Urbana, 1955.Google Scholar
Heywood, Jasper. Troas. London, 1559.Google Scholar
Heywood, Thomas. Apology for Actors . In Shakespeare’s Theater ( 2004 ), 213 – 54.10.1002/9780470752975.ch17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillman, David. Shakespeare’s Entrails. Basingstoke, 2007.10.1057/9780230285927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, Rudolf. “The Printing Tradition of Aeschylus, Euripides, Sophocles and Aristophanes.” Gutenberg Jahrbuch ( 1964 ): 138 – 46.Google Scholar
Holst-Warhaft, Gail. Dangerous Voices: Women’s Laments and Greek Literature. London, 1992.10.4324/9780203333846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Homer, . The Iliad. Ed., Murray, A. T.. 2 vols. Cambridge, MA, 1924.Google Scholar
Howard, Tony. Women as Hamlet: Performance and Interpretation in Theatre, Film and Fiction. Cambridge, 2007.Google Scholar
James, Heather. Shakespeare’s Troy. Cambridge, 1997.10.1017/CBO9780511581960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, Heather. “Dido’s Ear: Tragedy and the Politics of Response.” Shakespeare Quarterly 52.3 ( 2001 ): 360 – 82.10.1353/shq.2001.0044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jayne, Sears, and, Francis, R. Johnson, eds. The Lumley Library: The Catalogue of 1609. London, 1956.Google Scholar
Jervis, Swynfen. A Dictionary of the Language of Shakespeare. London, 1868.Google Scholar
Jones, Emrys. The Origins of Shakespeare. Oxford, 1977.Google Scholar
Kietzman, Mary Jo. “‘What Is Hecuba to Him or [S]he to Hecuba?’ Lucrece’s Complaint and Shakespearean Poetic Agency.” Modern Philology 97.1 ( 1999 ): 21 – 45.10.1086/492804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Letzler Cole, Susan. The Absent One: Mourning, Ritual, Tragedy, and the Performance of Ambivalence. University Park, 1985.Google Scholar
Levin, Richard. “Gertrude’s Elusive Libido and Shakespeare’s Unreliable Narrators.” Studies in English Literature 48. 2 ( 2008 ): 305 – 26.Google Scholar
Literary Criticism: Plato to Dryden. Ed. Gilbert, Allan H.. New York, 1940.Google Scholar
Longo, Odonne. “The Theater of Polis.” In Nothing to Do with Dionysus? ( 1990 ), 12 – 19.Google Scholar
Loraux, Nicole. Mothers in Mourning. Trans. Corinne Pache. Ithaca, 1998.Google Scholar
Lucas, F. L. Euripides and His Influence. New York, 1963.Google Scholar
Lumley, Jane. Iphigenia in Aulis. Ed., Child, Harold. Malone Society Reprints, 1909.Google Scholar
Maguire, Laurie. Shakespeare’s Names. Oxford, 2007.Google Scholar
Martindale, Charles. “Thinking Through Reception.” In Classics and the Uses of Reception, ed., Martindale, Charles and, Thomas, Richard F., 1 – 13. Oxford, 2006.10.1002/9780470774007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mastronarde, Donald J. The Art of Euripides: Dramatic Technique and Social Context. Cambridge, 2010.10.1017/CBO9780511676437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maus, Katharine Eisaman. “A Womb of His Own: Male Renaissance Poets in the Female Body.” In Sexuality and Gender in Early Modern Europe, ed., Grantham Turner, James, 266 – 88. Cambridge, 1993.Google Scholar
McDonald, Charles Osborne. The Rhetoric of Tragedy. Amherst, 1966.Google Scholar
Mehl, Dieter. The Elizabethan Dumb Show. London, 1965.Google Scholar
Minturno, Antonio. L’Arte Poetica. Venice, 1564.Google Scholar
Miola, Robert S. “Aeneas and Hamlet.” Classical and Modern Literature 8 ( 1988 ): 281 – 86.Google Scholar
Miola, Robert S. Shakespeare and Classical Tragedy: The Influence of Seneca. Oxford, 1992.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198112648.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miola, Robert S. “Euripides at Gray’s Inn: Gascoigne and Kinwelmersh’s Jocasta.” In The Female Tragic Hero ( 2002 ), 33 – 50.Google Scholar
Mossman, Judith. Wild Justice: A Study of Euripides’ Hecuba. Oxford, 1995.Google Scholar
Mueller, Martin. “Hamlet and the World of Ancient Tragedy.” Arion, 3rd ser., 5.1 ( 1997 ): 22 – 45.Google Scholar
Mullaney, Steven. “Mourning and Misogyny: Hamlet, The Revenger’s Tragedy, and the Final Progress of Elizabeth I, 1600–1607.” Shakespeare Quarterly 45.2 ( 1994 ): 139 – 62.10.2307/2871215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholson, Eric. “Ophelia Sings Like a Prima Donna Innamorata: Ophelia’s Mad Scene and the Italian Female Performer.” In Transnational Exchange in Early Modern Theater, ed., Henke, Robert and, Nicholson, Eric, 81 – 98. Aldershot, 2008.Google Scholar
Norland, Howard. Neoclassical Tragedy in Elizabethan England. Newark, 2009.Google Scholar
Norton, Thomas, and, Thomas, Sackville. Gorboduc . In Early English Classical Tragedies ( 1912 ), 3 – 64.Google Scholar
Nothing to Do with Dionysus? Athenian Drama in its Social Context. Ed. Winkler, John J. and, Zeitlin, Froma. Princeton, 1990.Google Scholar
Orgel, Stephen. “Shakespeare and the Kinds of Drama.” Critical Inquiry 6.1 ( 1979 ): 107 – 23.10.1086/448031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padel, Ruth. “Making Space Speak.” In Nothing to Do with Dionysus? ( 1990 ), 336 – 65.Google Scholar
Plato, , Republic. Ed., Shorey, Paul. 2 vols. Cambridge, MA, 1980.Google Scholar
Plutarch, . “De la fortune ou vertu d’Alexandre. ” In Les Oeuvres Morales & Meslees du Plutarque, trans. Jacques Amyot, 308r–318r. Paris, 1572.Google Scholar
Plutarch, . “On the fortune or virtue of Alexander.” In Moralia, ed., Babbitt, Frank, 4 : 382 – 487. Cambridge, MA, 1936.Google Scholar
Pollard, Tanya. Drugs and Theater in Early Modern England. Oxford, 2005.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199270835.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollard, Tanya. “Romancing the Greeks: Cymbeline’s Genres and Models.” In How To Do Things with Shakespeare, ed., Maguire, Laurie, 34 – 53. Oxford, 2007.Google Scholar
Puttenham, George. The Art of English Poesy . In Shakespeare’s Theater ( 2004 ), 135 – 45.10.1002/9780470752975.ch9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rackin, Phyllis. “Engendering the Tragic Audience: The Case of Richard III.” Studies in the Literary Imagination 26.1 ( 1993 ): 47 – 65.Google Scholar
Rehm, Rush. “Performing the Chorus: Choral Action, Interaction and Absence in Euripides.” Arion, 3rd ser., 4.1 ( 1996 ): 45 – 60.Google Scholar
Reiss, Timothy J. “Renaissance Theatre and the Theory of Tragedy.” In The Cambridge History ( 1999 ), 3 : 229 – 47.Google Scholar
Rose, Mary Beth. “Where Are the Mothers in Shakespeare? Options for Gender Representation in the English Renaissance.” Shakespeare Quarterly 42.3 ( 1991 ): 291 – 314.10.2307/2870845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saladin, Jean Christophe. “Euripide Luthérien?” Mélanges de l’Ecole française de Rome 108.1 ( 1996 ): 155 – 70.Google Scholar
Scaliger, J. C. Select Translations from Scaliger’s Poetics . Ed. and trans. Frederick Morgan Padelford. New York, 1905.Google Scholar
Schleiner, Louise. “Latinized Greek Drama in Shakespeare’s Writing of Hamlet.” Shakespeare Quarterly 41. 1 ( 1990 ): 29 – 48.10.2307/2870800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shakespeare, William. The Complete Works. Ed., Wells, Stanley and, Taylor, Gary. Oxford, 1986.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. The Norton Shakespeare. Ed., Greenblatt, Stephen,, Cohen, Walter,, Howard, Jean E., and, Eisaman Maus, Katharine. London, 1997.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. The Tragical History of Hamlet Prince of Denmark . Ed., Braunmuller, A. R.. The Pelican Shakespeare. New York, 2001.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. Hamlet, Prince of Denmark. Ed., Edwards, Philip. Cambridge, 2003.Google Scholar
Shakespeare’s Theater: A Sourcebook. Ed. Pollard, Tanya. Oxford, 2004.10.1002/9780470752975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shuger, Debora. The Renaissance Bible: Scholarship, Sacrifice, and Subjectivity. Berkeley, 1994.Google Scholar
Sidney, Philip. The Defense of Poesy . In Shakespeare’s Theater ( 2004 ), 146 – 65.10.1002/9780470752975.ch10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silk, Michael. “Shakespeare and Greek Tragedy: Strange Relationship.’” In Shakespeare and the Classics, ed., Martindale, Charles and, Taylor, A. B., 239 – 58. Cambridge, 2004.Google Scholar
Smith, Bruce. Ancient Scripts and Modern Experience on the English Stage, 1500–1700. Princeton, 1988.Google Scholar
Smith, Rebecca. “A Heart Cleft in Twain: The Dilemma of Shakespeare’s Gertrude.” In The Woman’s Part: Feminist Criticism of Shakespeare, ed., Swift Lenz, Carolyn Ruth,, Greene, Gayle, and, Thomas Neely, Carol, 194 – 210. Urbana, 1980.Google Scholar
Stiblinus, Gasparus. “In Hecabam Euripidis Praefatio.” In Evripides Poeta Tragicorum Princeps, 38 – 39. Basel, 1562.Google Scholar
Straznicky, Marta. Privacy, Playreading, and Women’s Closet Drama, 1500s–1700. Cambridge, 2004.Google Scholar
Streufert, Paul D. “Christopherson at Cambridge: Greco-Catholic Ethics in the Protestant University.” In Early Modern Academic Drama, ed., Walker, Jonathan and, Streufert, Paul D., 45 – 64. Ashgate, 2008.Google Scholar
Sypherd, Wilbur. Jephthah and his Daughter. Newark, 1948.Google Scholar
Taplin, Oliver. “Comedy and the Tragic.” In Tragedy and the Tragic ( 1996 ), 188 – 202.Google Scholar
Tarrant, R. J. “Senecan Drama and its Antecedents.” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 82 ( 1978 ): 213 – 63.10.2307/311033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, J. A. K. Shakespeare and the Classics. London, 1952.Google Scholar
Tragedy and the Tragic: Greek Theatre and Beyond. Ed. Silk, M. S.. Oxford, 1996.Google Scholar
Vernant, Jean-Pierre, and, Pierre, Vidal-Naquet. Myth and Tragedy in Ancient Greece. Trans. Janet Lloyd. New York, 1990.Google Scholar
A Warning for Fair Women. Ed. Cannon, Charles. The Hague, 1975.10.1515/9783110879858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waszink, Jan Hendrik. Erasmi opera omnia. 10 vols. Amsterdam, 1969.Google Scholar
Weil, Judith. “Visible Hecubas.” In The Female Tragic Hero ( 2002 ), 51 – 69.Google Scholar
Westney, Lizette. “Hecuba in Sixteenth-Century English Literature.” College Language Association Journal 27.4 ( 1984 ): 436 – 39.Google Scholar
Wilson, Douglas B. “Euripides’ Alcestis and the Ending of Shakespeare’s The Winter’s Tale.” Iowa State Journal of Research 58 ( 1984 ): 345 – 55.Google Scholar
Winston, Jessica. “Seneca in Early Elizabethan England.” Renaissance Quarterly 59.1 ( 2006 ): 29 – 58.10.1353/ren.2008.0232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wohl, Victoria. “Tragedy and Feminism.” In A Companion to Tragedy, ed., Bushnell, Rebecca, 145 – 60. Oxford, 2009.Google Scholar
Zeitlin, Froma. Playing the Other: Gender and Society in Classical Greek Literature. Chicago, 1996.Google Scholar