Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T18:16:14.427Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Power to Decide: Battered Wives in Early Modern Venice*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Joanne M. Ferraro
Joanne M. Ferraro*
Affiliation:
San Diego State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Historians of the Family in Renaissance Europe have devoted much attention to its patriarchal orientation. For the northern Italian cities, intense monographic study of elite behavior has illuminated the guiding principles behind strategies that preserved and enhanced family status. Those principles also occupy a prominent position in the prescriptive writings of contemporary jurists, humanists, and moralists; from them historians have argued that women's powers of decision in the urban environment of Renaissance Italy were severely limited. Similar conclusions have been reached for the Reformation period.

Type
Studies
Information
Renaissance Quarterly , Volume 48 , Issue 3 , Autumn 1995 , pp. 492 - 512
Copyright
Copyright © Renaissance Society of America 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Argelati, Francesco. Pratica del foro veneto. Venice, 1737.Google Scholar
Boccaccio, Giovanni. The Decameron. Rpt. Harmondsworth, Middlesex, England, 1982.Google Scholar
Boxer, Marilyn J. and Jean Quataert. “Women in the Age of Religious Upheaval and Political Centralization.” In Connecting Spheres: Women in the Western World, 1500 to the Present, ed. Boxer, Marilyn J. and Jean Quataert, 19-52. New York and Oxford, 1987.Google Scholar
Brucker, Gene. Giovanni and Lusanna. Berkeley, 1986.Google Scholar
Cavallo, Sandra and Cerutti, Simona. “Female Honor and the Social Control of Reproduction in Piedmont between 1600 and 1800.” In Sex and Gender in Historical Perspective: Selections from Quaderni Storici, ed. Muir, Edward and Ruggiero, Guido, 73-109. Baltimore, 1990.Google Scholar
Chojnacki, Stanley. “Patrician Women in Early Renaissance Venice.” Studies in the Renaissance 21 (1974): 176-203.Google Scholar
Chojnacki, Stanley. “Dowries and Kinsmen in Early Renaissance Venice.” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 5 (1975): 571-600.Google Scholar
Chojnacki, Stanley. “Blurring Genders.” Renaissance Quarterly 40 (1987): 743-51.Google Scholar
Chojnacki, Stanley. “ ‘The Most Serious Duty': Motherhood, Gender, and Patrician Culture in Renaissance Venice.” In Refiguring Woman: Perspectives on Gender and the Italian Renaissance, ed. Migiel, Marilyn and Schiesari, Juliana, 133-54. Ithaca, 1991.Google Scholar
Cohen, Sherrill. “Asylums for Women in Counter-Reformation Italy.” In Women in Reformation and Counter-Reformation Europe, ed. Marshall, Sherrin, 166-68. Bloomington and Indianapolis, 1989.Google Scholar
Cozzi, Gaetano. Religione, moralita egiustizia a Venezia:vicendedellamagistraturadegliesecutori contro la bestemmia. Padua, 1967-68.Google Scholar
Cozzi, Gaetano. “Note e documenti sulla questione del ‘divorzio’ a Venezia (1782-1788).“ Annali dell'Istituto storico italo-germanico in Trento 7 (1981): 275-360.Google Scholar
Davis, James C. A Venetian Family and Its Fortune, 1500-1900. Philadelphia, 1975.Google Scholar
Davis, Natalie Zemon. “City Women and Religious Change.” In Society and Culture in Early Modern France, 65–95. Stanford, 1975.Google Scholar
Davis, Natalie Zemon. “Boundaries and the Sense of Self in Sixteenth-Century France.” In Reconstructing Individualism: Autonomy, Individuality, and the Self in Western Thought, ed. Heller, Thomas C. etal., 53-63. Stanford, 1986.Google Scholar
Davis, Natalie Zemon. The Return of Martin Guerre. Cambridge, MA, 1986.Google Scholar
Derosas, Renzo. “Moralita e giustizia a Venezia nel ‘500-'6oo. Gli Esecutori contro la Bestemmia.” In Stato, societa egiustizia nella repubblica veneta (secolo XV—XVIII), ed. Cozzi, Gaetano, 1:431-528. Rome, 1980.Google Scholar
Diefendorf, Barbara. “Family Culture, Renaissance Culture.” Renaissance Quarterly 40 (1987), 661-81.Google Scholar
Ferrante, Lucia. “Honor Regained: Women in the Casa del Soccorso di San Paolo in Sixteenth-Century Bologna.” In Sex and Gender in Historical Perspective, ed. Muir, Edward and Ruggiero, Guido, 46-72. Baltimore and London, 1990.Google Scholar
Ferro, Marco. Dizionario del diritto comune, e veneto. 5 vols. Venice, 1780.Google Scholar
Flandrin, Jean-Louis. Families in Former Times: Kinship, Household, and Sexuality. Cambridge, 1979.Google Scholar
Giannetti, Laura. Venezia alia fine del XVI secolo: leparocchie di Santa Maria Nova e San Canciano. Tesi di laurea. Universita di Venezia. Venice, 1977-78.Google Scholar
Hanley, Sarah. “Family and State in Early Modern France: The Marriage Pact.” In Connecting Spheres. Women in the Western World, 1500 to the Present, ed. Boxer, Marilyn J. and Quataert, Jean, 53-63. New York and Oxford, 1987.Google Scholar
Kelly, Joan. “Did Women Have a Renaissance?“ In Women, History, and Theory: The Essays of Joan Kelly. Chicago, 1984.Google Scholar
Klapisch-Zuber, Christiane. “The Griselda Complex: Dowry and Marriage Gifts in the Quattrocento.” In Women, Family, and Ritual in Renaissance Italy. Chicago and London, 1985.Google Scholar
Klapisch-Zuber, . “Zacharias, or the Ousted Father: Nuptial Rites in Tuscany between Giotto and the Council of Trent.” In Women, Family, and Ritual in Renaissance Italy. Chicago and London, 1985.Google Scholar
Marshall, Sherrin, ed. Women in Reformation and Counter-Reformation Europe. Bloomington and Indianapolis, 1989.Google Scholar
Norton, Mary Beth. “Gender and Defamation in Seventeenth-Century Maryland.“ William and Mary Quarterly 44 (1987): 3-39.10.2307/1939717Google Scholar
Ozment, Steven. When Fathers Ruled: Family Life in Reformation Europe. Cambridge, MA and London, 1983.Google Scholar
Parte sostantiale delli decreti del sacro et general Concilio di Trento che furono publicati nella sinodo diocesana di Venezia il di XVIIdi Settembre 1564. Venice, 1564.Google Scholar
Pullan, Brian. Rich and Poor in Renaissance Venice. Cambridge, MA, 1971.Google Scholar
Romano, Dennis. Patricians and Popolani: The Social Foundations of the Venetian Renaissance State. Baltimore and London, 1987.Google Scholar
Romano, Dennis. “Gender and the Urban Geography of Renaissance Venice.” Journal of Social History 23 (1989): 339-53.Google Scholar
Ruggiero, Guido. The Boundaries of Eros: Sex Crime and Sexuality in Renaissance Venice. New York and Oxford, 1985.Google Scholar
Ruggiero, Guido. “ ‘Piu che la vita caro': onore, matrimonio, e reputazione femminile nel tardo Rinascimento.” Quademi Storici 66 (1987): 753-75.Google Scholar
Safely, Thomas. “Marital Litigation in the Diocese of Constance, 1551-1620.” Sixteenth Century Journal 12 (1981): 61-78.Google Scholar
Statutorum legum, ac iurium DD. Venetorum. Venice, 1619.Google Scholar
Stone, Lawrence. The Family, Sex, and Marriage in England 1500-1800. Abr. ed., New York, 1979.Google Scholar