Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:41:55.295Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Panormita's Reply to His Critics: The Hermaphroditus and the Literary Defense

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Eugene O'Connor
Eugene O'Connor*
Affiliation:
Buffalo, New York
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In her discussion of Imitatio, Julia Haig Gaisser describes how humanist scholars and poets justified their light, titillating compositions, based on Catullus, Martial, and The Priapea, by invoking the ancient literary defense, whose purpose was essentially to ward off potential critics or else to justify their oeuvre by making a sharp distinction between their life and their art. One locus classicus is Catullus 16.5-6: “Nam castum esse decet pium poetam/ ipsum, versiculos nihil necesse est” (The devoted poet ought to be chaste himself, his verses need not be so). Another is Martial, Epigrams 1.4.8, which, modeled as it is on Ovid, Tristia 2.354, speaks not of poets in general but of Martial himself: “Lasciva est nobis pagina, vita proba“ (My writing is lascivious, my life pure). The classical defensio or apologia was thus revived and given new meaning by the humanists as they sought to justify their literary endeavors in light of an emerging and ultimately puritanical sense of decorum.

Type
Studies
Information
Renaissance Quarterly , Volume 50 , Issue 4 , Winter 1997 , pp. 985 - 1010
Copyright
Copyright © Renaissance Society of America 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Antonii Bononiae Beccatelli cognomento Panhormitae epistolarum libri V. Venice, 1553.Google Scholar
Arnaldi, F., Rosa, L.G., and Sabia, L.M., eds. Poetae latini del quattrocento. Milan and Naples, n.d.Google Scholar
Bracciolini, Poggio. The Facetiae or Jocose Tales of Poggio. Now First Translated into English with the Latin Text. Vol. 1. Paris, 1879.Google Scholar
Colangelo, Francesco. Vita di Antonio Beccadelli Naples, 1820.Google Scholar
Coppini, Donatella, ed. Antonii Panhormitae Hermaphroditus. Rome, 1990.Google Scholar
Cossart, Michael de, trans, and intro. Antonio Beccadelli and the Hermaphrodite. Liverpool, 1984.Google Scholar
Cronin, V. The Florentine Renaissance. New York, 1967.Google Scholar
Forberg, C.F., ed. Antonii Panormitae Hermaphroditus. Corburg, 1824; Leipzig, 1908.Google Scholar
Gaisser, Julia Haig. Catullus and His Renaissance Readers. Oxford, 1993.Google Scholar
Godman, Peter and Murray, Oswyn, eds. Latin Poetry and the Classical Tradition: Essays in Medieval and Renaissance Studies. Oxford, 1990.Google Scholar
Hausmann, Frank-Rutger. “Carmina Priapea.” In Catalogus translationum et commentariorum. Medieval and Renaissance Translations and Commentaries, Annotated Lists and Guides, eds. F.E. Cranz and P.O. Kristeller, 4:423–50. Washington, DC, 1980.Google Scholar
L'Hermaphrodite de Panormita. Paris, 1892.Google Scholar
Kidwell, C. Pontano: Poet and Prime Minister. London, 1991.Google Scholar
Ludwig, Walther. Litterae Neolatinae: Shriften zur neulatemischen Literatur. Hamburg, 1989.Google Scholar
Ludwig, Walther. “Platons Kuss und seine Folgen.” Illinois Classical Studies 14 (1989): 435–47.Google Scholar
Page, D.L., ed. Further Greek Epigrams. Cambridge, 1981.Google Scholar
Richlin, Amy. The Garden ofPriapus: Sexuality and Aggression in Roman Humor. New Haven and London, 1983.Google Scholar
Robinson, B. The Life of Paul. Chicago, 1918.Google Scholar
Robinson, George W. “Joseph Scaliger's Estimates of Greek and Latin Authors.” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 29 (1918): 133–76.Google Scholar
Sullivan, J. P. Martial, the Unexpected Classic: A Literary and Historical Study. Cambridge, 1991.Google Scholar