Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T06:12:05.244Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Language and History in the Reformation: Cranmer, Gardiner, and the Words of Institution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Judith H. Anderson
Judith H. Anderson*
Affiliation:
Indiana University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Over centuries, the fortunes of the verb to be illustrate the involvement of language in history and history in language, and the particular role of figurative language in the early reforms of the established church in Tudor England significantly reflects this involvement. Explanations and controversies regarding eucharistic belief during the archbishopric of Thomas Cranmer, which of ten draw on Continental sources, show that language and rhetoric were at the heart of Cranmer's basic problem, namely, how effectively to convey a metaphorical conception of presence. These arguments variously parallel contemporary ones concerning meaning and the nature of metaphor, as evident in writings of Benveniste, Derrida, and especially Ricoeur.

Type
Studies
Information
Renaissance Quarterly , Volume 54 , Issue 1 , Spring 2001 , pp. 20 - 51
Copyright
Copyright © Renaissance Society of America 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aers, David, and Staley, Lynn. 1996. The Powers of the Holy: Religion, Politics, and Gender in Late Medieval English Culture. University Park, PA.Google Scholar
Anderson, Judith H. 1976. The Growth of a Personal Voice: “Piers Plowman “ and “The Faerie Queene. “ New Haven.Google Scholar
Anderson, Judith H. 1998. “Translating Investments: The Metaphoricity of Language, 2 Henry IV, and Hamlet.” Texas Studies in Literature and Language 40: 231-67.Google Scholar
Anderson, Marvin. 1988. “Rhetoric and Reality: Peter Martyr and the English Reformation.” Sixteenth Century Journal 19: 451–69.Google Scholar
Aquinas, St. Thomas. 1964-1976. Summa Theologiae. Blackfriars Edition. 60 vols. London.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . 1984. The Complete Works of Aristotle. Ed. Jonathan Barnes. 2 vols. Princeton.Google Scholar
Benveniste, Emile. 1971. Problems in General Linguistics. Trans. Mary Elizabeth Meek. Coral Gables, FL.Google Scholar
Berger, Harry, Jr. Forthcoming. “Metaphor and Metonymy, and the End of the Middle Ages.” In Situated Utterances: Texts, Bodies, and Cultural Representations. Stanford.Google Scholar
Brook, Stella. 1965. The Language of the Book of Common Prayer. New York.Google Scholar
Brooks, Peter Newman. 1992. Thomas Cranmer's Doctrine of the Eucharist: An Essay in Historical Development. 2nd ed. London.Google Scholar
Bucer, Martin. 1974. Censura. In Martin Bucer and The Book of Common Prayer, ed. and trans. E. C. Whitaker. Great Wakering, UK.Google Scholar
Bynum, Caroline. 1987. Holy Fast and Holy Feast: The Religious Significance of Food to Medieval Women. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Bynum, Caroline. 1992. Fragmentation and Redemption: Essays on Gender and the Human Body in Medieval Religion. New York.Google Scholar
Bynum, Caroline. 1995. The Resurrection of the Body in Western Christianity, 200-1336. New York.Google Scholar
Byron, Brian. 1989. “From Essence to Presence: A Shift in Eucharistic Expression Illustrated from the Apologetic of St. Thomas More.” In Miscellanea Moreana: Essays for Germain Marc'hadour, ed. Clare M. Murphy, Henri Gibaud, and Mario A. DiCesare, 429-41. Binghamton.Google Scholar
Calvin, John. 1844. A Treatise on the Sacrament of the Body and Blood of Christ. In Writings and Translations of Myles Coverdale, ed. George Pearson, 425- 66.Google Scholar
Calvin, John. 1961. Institutes of the Christian Religion. Ed. John T. McNeill. Trans. Ford Lewis Battles. 2 vols. London. Cassirer, Ernst. 1953. The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms. Trans. Ralph Mannheim. 4 vols. New Haven.Google Scholar
Courtenay, William J. 1964. “Cranmer as Nominalist.” Harvard Theological Review. 57: 189–216.Google Scholar
Cranmer, Thomas. 1844. An Answer unto a Crafty and Sophistical Cavillation Devised by Stephen Gardiner. In Writings and Disputations, ed. John Edmund Cox, 1-367. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Cranmer, Thomas. 1965. A Defence of the True and Catholic Doctrine of the Sacrament of the Body and Bbod of Our Saviour Christ. Ed. G. E. Duffield. Philadelphia.Google Scholar
de Certeau, Michel. 1984. The Practice of Everyday Life. Trans. Steven Randall. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1975. “White Mythology: Metaphor in the Text of Philosophy.” Trans. F.C.T. Moore. New Literary History 6: 5–74.Google Scholar
Duffy, Eamon. 1992. The Stripping of the Altars: Traditional Religion in England. New Haven.Google Scholar
Duns Scotus, John. 1891-1895. Opus Oxoniense. In Opera Omnia. 26 vols. Paris.Google Scholar
Edwards, Paul, ed. 1967. Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 8 vols. London.Google Scholar
Erasmus Desiderius of Rotterdam. 1703-1706. Annotationes. In vol. 6 of Operium Omnium, ed. Jean Le Clerc. Leiden.Google Scholar
Erasmus Desiderius of Rotterdam. 1986. Erasmus’ Annotations on the New Testament: The Gospels. [Facsimile of the 1535 text, with all earlier variants.] Ed. Anne Reeve. London.Google Scholar
Foxe, John. 1965, reprint. The Acts and Monuments of John Foxe. Ed. George Townsend. 8 vols. 1841. New York.Google Scholar
Gardiner, Stephen. 1546. A Detection of the Devils Sophistrie. London.Google Scholar
Gardiner, Stephen. 1551. An Explication and assertion of the true Catholique fayth, touchyng the most blessed Sacrament of the aulter. N.P.Google Scholar
Gerrish, B. A. 1982. The Old Protestantism and the New: Essays on the Reformation Heritage. Chicago.Google Scholar
Gerrish, B. A. 1988. “Discerning the Body: Sign and Reality in Luther's Controversy with the Swiss.” The Journal of Religion 68: 377–95.Google Scholar
Gerrish, B. A. 1993a. Continuing the Reformation: Essays on Modern Religious Thought. Chicago.Google Scholar
Gerrish, B. A. 1993b. Grace and Gratitude: The Eucharistic Theology of John Calvin. Minneapolis.Google Scholar
Greenblatt, Stephen. 1996. “Remnants of the Sacred in Early Modern England.” In Subject and Object in Renaissance Culture, ed. Margreta de Grazia, Maureen Quilligan, and Peter Stallybrass, 337-45. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hall, Basil. 1993. “Cranmer, the Eucharist and the Foreign Divines in the Reign of Edward VI.” In Thomas Cranmer: Churchman and Scholar, ed. Paul Ayris and David Selwyn, 217-58. Woodbridge, Suffolk.Google Scholar
Henle, Paul. 1981. “Metaphor.” In Philosophical Perspectives on Metaphor, ed. Mark Johnson, 83-104. Minneapolis.Google Scholar
Hooper, John. 1843. Answer to the Bishop of Winchester's Book. In Early Writings, ed. Samuel Carr, 97-247. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Houston, Julia. 1994. “Transubstantiation and the Sign: Cranmer s Drama of the Last Supper,” Journal of Medieval and Renaissance Studies 24: 115–30.Google Scholar
Kahn, Charles H. 1973. The Verb ‘Be'in Ancient Greek. Part 6 of The Verb ‘Be’ and its Synonyms: Philosophical and Grammatical Studies. Ed. John W. M. Verhaar. Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Lanham, Richard. 1968. A Handlist of Rhetorical Terms. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Lewis, Charlton T., and Short, Charles. 1966, reprint. A Latin Dictionary. Oxford.Google Scholar
Luther, Martin. 1961. Confession Concerning Christ's Supper 1528. In Word and Sacrament, 3, ed. and trans. Robert H. Fischer, 151-372. Vol. 37 of Luther's Works, ed. Jaroslav Pelikan and Helmut T. Lehmann. 55 vols. Philadelphia.Google Scholar
MacCulloch, Diarmaid. 1996. Thomas Cranmer: A Life. New Haven.Google Scholar
McGee, Eugene K. 1964. “Cranmer and Nominalism.” Harvard Theological Review 57: 189–216.Google Scholar
McGee, Eugene K. 1968. “Cranmer's Nominalism Reaffirmed.” Harvard Theological Review 59: 192–96.Google Scholar
Mclnerny, Ralph. 1996. Aquinas andAnalogy. Washington.Google Scholar
Oecolampadius, Johannes. 1927-1934. Briefe undAkten zum Leben Oekolampads. Ed. Ernst Staehelin. 2 vols. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Peter Martyr Vermigli. [1550?] A Discourse or traictise wherein he openly declared his whole and determinate iudgemente concernynge the Sacrament of the Lordes supper. Trans. Nicholas Udall. London.Google Scholar
Pierce, Charles Sanders. 1991. Pierce On Signs. Ed. James Hoopes. Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Principe, Walter Henry. 1963. William of Auxerre's Theology of the Hypostatic Union. Toronto.Google Scholar
Redworth, Glyn. 1990. In Defence of the Church Catholic: The Life of Stephen Gardiner. Oxford.Google Scholar
Richardson, Cyril C. 1965. “Cranmer and the Analysis of Eucharistic Doctrine,” Journal of Theological Studies 16: 421-37.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul. 1979a, reprint. “The Metaphorical Process as Cognition, Imagination, and Feeling.” In On Metaphor, ed. Sheldon Sacks, 141-57. Chicago.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul. 1979b. The Rule of Metaphor: Multi-disciplinary Studies of the Creation of Meaning in Language. Trans. Robert Czerny. Toronto.Google Scholar
Ridley, Nicholas. 1843. A Brief Declaration of the Lord's Supper, or A Treatise against the Error ofTransubstantiation. In The Works of Nicholas Ridley, ed. Henry Christmas, 5-45. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rubin, Miri. 1991. Corpus Christi: The Eucharist in Late Medieval Culture. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rummel, Erika. 1986. Erasmus’ “Annotations “ on the New Testament: From Philologist to Theologian. Toronto.Google Scholar
Rupp, Gordon. 1967. Patterns of Reformation. Philadephia.Google Scholar
Tertullian. 1972. TertuUian adversus Marcionem. Ed. and trans. Ernest Evans. 2 vols. Oxford.Google Scholar
Waswo, Richard. 1987. Languagt and Meaning in the Renaissance. Princeton.Google Scholar
Ziegler, Donald J., ed. 1969. Great Debates of the Reformation. New York.Google Scholar
Zwingli, Huldrych (also Huldrich and Huldreich). 1927. “AdTheobaldi Billicani et Urbani Rhegii epistolas responsio.” In Huldreich Zwinglis Sdmliche Werke, ed. Emil Egli, Georg Finsler, Walther Kohler, and Oskar Farner, 893-941. 14 vols. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Zwingli, Huldrych. 1953. On the Lord's Supper. In Zwingli and Bullinger, trans. G. W Bromiley, 185-347. Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Zwingli, Huldrych. 1984. Friendly Exegesis, that is, Exposition of the Matter of the Eucharist to Martin Luther, trans. Henry Preble. In Writings of Huldrich Zwingli, vol. 2, ed. H. Wayne Pipkin. Allison Park, PA.Google Scholar