Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T13:23:25.178Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Impact of the Netherlandish Landscape Tradition on Poetry and Painting in Early Modern England*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Sara Trevisan
Sara Trevisan*
Affiliation:
Brunel University, London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The relationship between poetry and painting has been one of the most debated issues in the history of criticism. The present article explores this problematic relationship in the context of sixteenth- and seventeenth-century England, taking into account theories of rhetoric, visual perception, and art. It analyzes a rare case in which a specific school of painting directly inspired poetry: in particular, the ways in which the Netherlandish landscape tradition influenced natural descriptions in the poem Poly-Olbion (1612, 1622) by Michael Drayton (1563–1631). Drayton — under the influence of the artistic principles of landscape depiction as explained in Henry Peacham’s art manuals, as well as of direct observation of Dutch and Flemish landscape prints and paintings — successfully managed to render pictorial landscapes into poetry. Through practical examples, this essay will thoroughly demonstrate that rhetoric is capable of emulating pictorial styles in a way that presupposes specialized art-historical knowledge, and that pictorialism can be the complex product as much of poetry and rhetoric as of painting and art-theoretical vocabulary.

Type
Research Article
Information
Renaissance Quarterly , Volume 66 , Issue 3 , Fall 2013 , pp. 866 - 903
Copyright
Copyright © Renaissance Society of America 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

I would like to thank Paul Taylor (Warburg Institute) for discussing with me issues concerning the Netherlandish landscape tradition, as well as two anonymous readers for RQ for their invaluable criticism and suggestions.

References

Adrian, John M. Local Negotiations of English Nationhood, 1570–1680. New York, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, Jochen. “The Pleasures of Variety: Remarks on Landscape.” In Théories des artes et creation artistique dans l'Europe du Nord du XVIe au début du XVIIIe siècle, ed. Michèle-Caroline Heck, Frédérique Lemerle, and Yves Pauwels, 273–90. Villeneuve d’Ascq, 2002.Google Scholar
Bender, John B. Spenser and Literary Pictorialism. Princeton, 1972.Google Scholar
Bense, Johan F. Anglo-Dutch Relations. London, 1925.Google Scholar
Bullen, Arthur H. Selections from the Poems of Michael Drayton. Chilsworth, 1883.Google Scholar
Burton, Robert. Anatomy of Melancholy. 2 vols. London, 1621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton, Robert. Anatomy of Melancholy. 2 vols. London, 1624.Google Scholar
Byard, Margaret M. “The Trade of Courtiership: The Countess of Bedford and the Bedford Memorials; A Family History from 1585 to 1607.” History Today 29 (1979): 20–28.Google Scholar
Cosgrove, Denis. “Prospect, Perspective and the Evolution of the Landscape Idea.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 10 (1985): 45–62.Google Scholar
Daye, Angel. The English Secretorie. London, 1586.Google Scholar
Dekker, Thomas. The Seven Deadly Sins. London, 1606.Google Scholar
Delano-Smith, Catherine, and Kain, Roger J. P.. English Maps: A History. London, 1999.Google Scholar
Drayton, Michael. The Barrons Wars. London, 1603.Google Scholar
Drayton, Michael. Poems by Michael Drayton, Esq. London, 1610.Google Scholar
Drayton, Michael. Mortimeriados. In The Works of Michael Drayton (1931–41a), 1:305–92.Google Scholar
Drayton, Michael. Poly-Olbion. In The Works of Michael Drayton (1931–41b), vol. 4.Google Scholar
Duchemin, H. P. “Michael Drayton’s Poly-Olbion: A Critical and Historical Study.” PhD diss., Birkbeck College, University of London, 1975.Google Scholar
Dunthorne, Hugh. “Eighteenth-Century English Perceptions of the Landscape and Landscape Painting of the Netherlands.” Dutch Crossing 31.1 (1987): 41–53.Google Scholar
Dutch and Flemish Artists in Britain 1550–1800, Leids Kunsthistorisch Jaarboek. Ed. Juliette Roding and Eric Jan Sluijter. Leiden, 2003.Google Scholar
Evett, David. Literature and the Visual Arts in Tudor England. Athens, GA, 1990.Google Scholar
Ewell, Barbara C. “Michael Drayton: England’s Body Immortalized.” Studies in Philology 75 (1978): 297–315.Google Scholar
Farmer, Norman K. Poets and the Visual Arts in Renaissance England. Athens, GA, 1990.Google Scholar
Fitter, Chris. Poetry, Space, Landscape: Toward a New Theory. Cambridge, 1995.Google Scholar
Foster, John W. “A Redefinition of Topographical Poetry.” Journal of English and German Philology 69.3 (1970): 394–406.Google Scholar
Freedberg, David. Dutch Landscape Prints of the Seventeenth Century. London, 1980.Google Scholar
Friedland, Louis S. “The Illustrations in the Theatre for Worldlings.” Huntington Library Quarterly 19.2 (1956): 107–20.Google Scholar
Friedländer, Max W. Landscape — Portrait — Still Life. Trans. R. F. C. Hull. Oxford, 1949.Google Scholar
Gelder van, J. G. “Notes on the Royal Collection: IV. The ‘Dutch Gift’ of 1610, to Henry, Prince of ‘Whalis,’ and Some Other Presents.” Burlington Magazine 105.729 (1963): 541–45.Google Scholar
Gent, Lucy. Picture and Poetry: Relationships between Literature and the Visual Arts in the English Renaissance. Leamington Spa, 1981.Google Scholar
Gerard, Robert A. “Woutneel, de Passe and the Anglo-Netherlandish Print Trade.” Print Quarterly 13 (1996): 363–76.Google Scholar
Gibson, Walter S. Pleasant Places: The Rustic Landscape from Bruegel to Ruisdael. Berkeley, 2000.Google Scholar
Goeree, Willem. Inleyding tot de Praktyk der Algemeene Schilderkonst. Middleburg, 1668.Google Scholar
Gombrich, Ernst H. “Renaissance Artistic Theory and the Development of Landscape Painting.” In Norm and Form: Studies in the Art of the Renaissance, 5–18. London, 1966.Google Scholar
Gombrich, Ernst H. The Heritage of Apelles. Ithaca, 1976.Google Scholar
Gottfried, Rudolf B. “Spenser and the Italian Myth of Locality.” Studies in Philology 34 (1937): 107–25.Google Scholar
Grant, Maurice H. A Chronological History of Old English Landscape Painters. 7 vols. Leigh-on-Sea, 1957.Google Scholar
Griffiths, Anthony. The Print in Stuart Britain 1603–1689. London, 1998.Google Scholar
Hadfield, Andrew. “Spenser, Drayton and the Question of Britain.” Review of English Studies 51 (2000): 582–99.Google Scholar
Hagstrum, Jean H. The Sister Arts: The Tradition of Literary Pictorialism and English Poetry from Dryden to Gray. Chicago, 1958.Google Scholar
Harding, Robert J. D. “Was William Camden a Collector of Flemish Landscapes?” British Art Journal (2009): 65–66.Google Scholar
Hayes, John. “British Patrons and Landscape Painting.” Apollo 18 (1965): 38–46.Google Scholar
Hearn, Karen, ed. Dynasties: Painting in Tudor and Jacobean England. London, 1995.Google Scholar
Hearn, Karen. “A Question of Judgment: Lucy Harington, Countess of Bedford, as Art Patron and Collector.” In The Evolution of English Collecting, ed. Edward Chaney, 221–39. London, 2004.Google Scholar
Helgerson, Richard. Forms of Nationhood: The Elizabethan Writing of England. Chicago, 1992.Google Scholar
Hind, Arthur M. Engraving in England in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries. 3 vols. Cambridge, 1952–64.Google Scholar
Horden, John. “Peacham Henry (b. 1578, d. in or after 1644).” In Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford, 2004. doi: 10.1093/ref:odnb/21667.Google Scholar
Howell, Wilbur S. Logic and Rhetoric in England 1500–1700. New York, 1961.Google Scholar
Hulse, Clark. The Rule of Art: Literature and Painting in the Renaissance. Chicago, 1990.Google Scholar
Hunt, John Dixon. William Kent: Landscape Garden Designer. London, 1987.Google Scholar
Klein, Bernhard. “Imaginary Journeys: Spenser, Drayton, and the Poetics of National Space.” In Literature, Mapping and the Politics of Space in Early Modern Britain, ed. A. Gordon and B. Klein, 204–23. Cambridge, 2001a.Google Scholar
Klein, Bernhard. Maps and the Writing of Space in Early Modern England and Ireland. New York, 2001b.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lagerlöf, Margaretha L. Ideal Landscape: Annibale Carracci, Nicolas Poussin, and Claude Lorrain. New Haven, 1990.Google Scholar
Lee, Rensselaer W. “Ut Pictura Poesis: The Humanistic Theory of Painting.” Art Bulletin 22.4 (1940): 197–269.Google Scholar
Levesque, Catherine. Journey Through Landscapes in Seventeenth-Century Holland. University Park, PA, 1994.Google Scholar
Levy, F. J. “Henry Peacham and the Art of Drawing.” Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 37 (1974): 174–90.Google Scholar
Luborsky, Ruth S. “The Illustrations of the Shepheardes Calender.” Spenser Studies 2 (1981): 3–53.Google Scholar
Lunde, Ingunn. “Rhetorical Enargeia and Linguistic Pragmatics.” Journal of Historical Pragmatics 5.1 (2004): 49–80.Google Scholar
Maartens, Maximiliaan, and Natasja Peeters. “‘A Tale of Two Cities’: Antwerp Artists and Artisans in London in the Sixteenth Century.” In Dutch and Flemish Artists in Britain 1550–1800 (2003), 31–42.Google Scholar
Mack, Peter. “Agricola’s Use of the Comparison Between Writing and the Visual Arts.” Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 55 (1992): 169–79.Google Scholar
Mack, Peter. Elizabethan Rhetoric: Theory and Practice. Cambridge, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McEachern, Claire. The Poetics of Nationhood, 1590–1612. Cambridge, 1996.Google Scholar
Millar, Oliver, ed. “Catalogue of the Collections of Charles I, by Abraham van der Doort.” Walpole Society 37(1958–60): 1–256.Google Scholar
Morgan, Florence H. “A Biography of Lucy, Countess of Bedford.” PhD diss., University of Southern California, 1956.Google Scholar
Newdigate, Bernard H. Michael Drayton and His Circle. Oxford, 1961.Google Scholar
Ogden, Henry V. S., and Margaret S. Ogden. “A Bibliography of Seventeenth-Century Writings on the Pictorial Arts in English.” Art Bulletin 29.3 (1947): 196–207.Google Scholar
Ogden, Henry V. S., and Ogden, Margaret S.. English Taste in Landscape in the Seventeenth Century. Ann Arbor, 1955.Google Scholar
Parshall, Peter W. “Imago Contrafacta: Images and Facts in the Northern Renaissance.” Art History 16 (1993): 554–79.Google Scholar
Peacham, Henry. The Garden of Eloquence. London, 1577.Google Scholar
Peacham, Henry.The Art of Drawing with the Pen. London, 1606.Google Scholar
Peacham, Henry. The Gentleman’s Exercise. London, 1612a.Google Scholar
Peacham, Henry. Graphice. London, 1612b.Google Scholar
Peacham, Henry. The Compleat Gentleman. London, 1634.Google Scholar
Pearsall, Derek, and Salter, Elizabeth. Landscapes and Seasons of the Medieval World. London, 1973.Google Scholar
Praz, Mario. Mnemosyne: The Parallel Between Literature and the Visual Arts. Princeton, 1974.Google Scholar
Prosperetti, Leopoldine Van Hogendorp. Landscape and Philosophy in the Art of Jan Brueghel the Elder (1568–1625). Farnham, 2009.Google Scholar
Raleigh, Walter. The True Description of Guiana. London, 1617.Google Scholar
de Ramaix, Isabelle. “Johan Sadeler I.” In The Illustrated Bartsch, 70:1–2. New York, 1999.Google Scholar
Ravenna, Giovanni. “Per l’identità di ekphrasis.” Incontri triestini di filologia classica 4 (2004–05): 21–30.Google Scholar
Rees, Ronald. “Historical Links Between Cartography and Art.” Geographical Review 70.1 (1980): 60–78.Google Scholar
Revard, Stella P. “The Design of Nature in Michael Drayton’s Poly-Olbion.” Studies in English Literature, 1500–1900 17 (1977): 105–17.Google Scholar
Rubinstein, Greg M. G. “Artists from the Netherlands in Seventeenth-Century Britain: An Overview of their Landscape Work.” In The Exchange of Ideas: Religion, Scholarship and Art in Anglo-Dutch Relations in the Seventeenth Century, ed. Simon Groenveld and Michael J. Whintle, 163–91. Zutphen, 1994.Google Scholar
Semler, Liam E. The English Mannerist Poets and the Visual Arts. Madison, 1998.Google Scholar
Semler, Liam E. “Breaking the Ice of Invention: Henry Peacham’s The Art of Drawing (1606).” Sixteenth Century Journal 35.3 (2004): 735–50.Google Scholar
Seznec, Jean. “Art and Literature: A Plea for Humility.” New Literary History 3.3 (1972): 569–74.Google Scholar
Silver, Larry. Peasant Scenes and Landscapes: The Rise of Pictorial Genres in the Antwerp Market. Philadelphia, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sluijter, Eric Jan. “The English Venture: Dutch and Flemish Artists in Britain, 1550–1800.” In Dutch and Flemish Artists in Britain 1550–1800 (2003), 11–30.Google Scholar
Stechow, Wolfgang. Dutch Landscape Painting of the Seventeenth Century. London, 1966.Google Scholar
Strong, Roy. The English Icon: Elizabethan and Jacobean Portraiture. London, 1969.Google Scholar
Stumpel, Jeroen. “The Foul Fowler Found Out: On a Key Motif in Dürer’s ‘Four Witches.’” Simiolus 30.3–4 (2003): 143–60.Google Scholar
Sutton, Peter C., ed. Masters of 17th-Century Dutch Landscape Painting. London, 1987.Google Scholar
Swan, Claudia. “Ad vivum, near het leven, from the life: Defining a Mode of Presentation.” Word and Image 11.4 (1995): 353–72.Google Scholar
Sypher, Wylie. Four Stages of Renaissance Style: Transformations in Art and Literature, 1400–1700. Garden City, NY, 1955.Google Scholar
Taylor, Paul. “The Concept of Houding in Dutch Art Theory.” Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 55 (1992): 201–32.Google Scholar
Trevisan, Sara. “Michael Drayton’s Poly-Olbion: A Study in Perspective.” PhD diss., University of Padua, 2010.Google Scholar
Turner, James. “Landscape and the ‘Art Prospective,’ 1584–1660.” Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 42 (1979): 290–93.Google Scholar
Veldman, Ilja M. Images for the Eye and Soul: Function and Meaning in Netherlandish Prints 1450–1650. Leiden, 2006.Google Scholar
Veltman, Kim. “Military Surveying and Topography: The Practical Dimension of Renaissance Linear Perspective.” Revista de Universidade de Coimbra 17 (1979): 269–79.Google Scholar
Vertue, George. “II. Note-books A.g and A.c (Add. MSS. 23070; 23075).” Walpole Society 20 (1931–32).Google Scholar
Vertue, George. “V. Note-books A.y.y., A.w., B.3 and D.1 (Add. MSS. 23073; 22042; 23087; 23089).” Walpole Society 26 (1937–38).Google Scholar
Walpole, Horace. Anecdotes of Painting in England. 3 vols. London, 1849.Google Scholar
Waterhouse, Ellis K. English Painting 1530–1790. London, 1953.Google Scholar
Webb, Ruth. “Ekphrasis Ancient and Modern: The Invention of a Genre.” Word & Image 15.1 (1999): 7–18.Google Scholar
Weisstein, Ulrich. “Comparing Literature and Art: Current Trends in Critical Theory and Methodology.” In Literature and the Other Arts, ed. Zoran Konstantinovic, Steven P. Scher, and Ulrich Weisstein, 19–30. Innsbruck, 1981.Google Scholar
Wellek, René. “Parallelism Between Literature and the Arts.” English Institute Annual, 1941, 95–128. New York, 1942.Google Scholar
Wells-Cole, Anthony. “The Patronage of Elizabeth Countess of Shrewsbury and Hardwick: A Study in the Influence of Netherlandish Prints in Sixteenth-Century England.” In Dutch and Flemish Artists in Britain 1550–1800 (2003), 233–54.Google Scholar
Wilks, Timothy. “Art Collecting at the English Court from the Death of Henry, Prince of Wales, to the Death of Anne of Denmark.” Journal of the History of Collections 9.1 (1997): 31–48.Google Scholar
Wood, Christopher S. Albrecht Altdorfer and the Origins of Landscape. London, 1993.Google Scholar
The Works of Michael Drayton. Ed. J. William Hebel, Kathleen Tillotson, and Bernard H. Newdigate. 4 vols. Oxford, 1931–41.Google Scholar
Zanker, Graham. “Enargeia in the Ancient Criticism of Poetry.” Reinisches Museum 124 (1981): 297–311.Google Scholar