Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T14:41:19.932Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Early Modern Controversies about the One-Sex Model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Winfried Schleiner
Winfried Schleiner*
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This essay traces the opposition to the Galenic notion of a homology between male and female genitalia (the “one-sex model”) and identifies the French physician André Dulaurens as the first outspoken opponent. After Dulaurens, the German physician Johann Peter Lotichius makes the opposition to that model more clearly an argument that may be called “feminist.”

Type
Studies
Information
Renaissance Quarterly , Volume 53 , Issue 1 , Spring 2000 , pp. 180 - 191
Copyright
Copyright © Renaissance Society of America 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adelman, Janet. 1999. “Making Defect Perfection: Shakespeare and the One-Sex Model.” In Enacting Gender on the English Renaissance Stage, eds. Comensoli, Viviana and Russell, Anne, 23–52. Urbana, IL.Google Scholar
Bonaccioli, Lodovico. 1639. De foetus formatione. Leiden.Google Scholar
Castro, Rodigra. 1614. Medicus-Politicus. Hamburg.Google Scholar
Castro, Rodigra. 1617. De universa muliebrium morborum medicina. 2nd ed. (1st ed. 1603) Hamburg.Google Scholar
Columbus, Realdus. 1593. De anatomica libri xv. Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Crooke, Heliah. 1615. Microcosmographia: A Description of the Body of Man. London.Google Scholar
Diderot, Denis. 1987. Oeuvres completès. Ed. H. Dieckman and J. Varlot. Paris.Google Scholar
Dulaurens, André 1595. Opera anatomica. Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Dulaurens, André. 1610. L'histoire anatomique. Trans. Sizé, Francois Paris.Google Scholar
Fallopio, Gabriele. 1600. Institutiones anatomicae. In Opera omnia. Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Greenblatt, Stephen J. 1988. Shakespearean Negotiations: The Circulation of Social Energy in Renaissance England. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Guinterius, Ioannes. 1585. Institutionum anatomicarum secundum Galeni sententiam. Wittenberg.Google Scholar
Hirsch, August. 1962. Biographisches Lexikon der hervorragenden Aerzte alter Zeiten. 5 vols. 3rd ed. (1st ed. 1883.) Munich and Berlin.Google Scholar
Knobloch, Tobias, praes. (Hase, Simon). 1607. De genitalibus, tarn in viris, quaminfoeminisprocreationifamulantibus. Dissertation. Wittenberg.Google Scholar
Laqueur, Thomas. 1990. Making Sex: Body and Gender from the Greeks to Freud. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Lesky, Erna. 1950. “Die Zeugungs- und Vererbungslehren der Antike und ihr Nachwirken.” Abhandlungen der geistes- und sozialwissenschaftlichen Klasse 19: 1225-425.Google Scholar
Lotichius, Johann Peter. 1630. Gynaicologia. Rinteln.Google Scholar
Maclean, Ian. 1977. Woman Triumphant: Feminism in French Literature 1610-1652. Oxford.Google Scholar
Maclean, Ian. 1980. Renaissance Notion of Woman: A Study in the Fortunes of Scholasticism and Medical Science in European Intellectual Life. Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511562471Google Scholar
Orgel, Stephen. 1996. Impersonations: The Performance of Gender in Shakespeare's England Cambridge.Google Scholar
Park, Katherine. 1997. “The Rediscovery of the Clitoris.” In The Body in Parts: Fantasies of Corporeality in Early Modern Europe, eds. Hillman, David and Mazzio, Carla, 171-93. New York and London.Google Scholar
Pinaeus, Severinus. 1599. Opusculum physiologicum. Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Ramet, Sabrina Petra, ed. 1996. Gender Reversals and Gender Cultures: Anthropological and Historical Perspectives. London and New York.Google Scholar
Riolan, Jean. 1651. Curieuses recherches sur les escholes en medecine, de Paris et de Montpellier. Paris.Google Scholar
Schleiner, Winfried. 1995. Medical Ethics in the Renaissance. Washington, DC. Google Scholar
Vesalius, Andreas. 1555. De humani corporis fabrica libri septem. Basel.Google Scholar
Von Staden, Heinrich. 1989. Herophilos: The Art of Medicine in Early Alexandria. Cambridge and New York.Google Scholar