Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T14:22:46.145Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Abridging the Antiquitee of Faerylond: New Paths Through Old Matter in The FaerieQueene*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Wheatley Chloe
Wheatley Chloe*
Affiliation:
Trinity College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Sixteenth-century history may have been recorded most spectacularly in prestigious folio chronicles, but readers had more ready access to printed books that conveyed this history in epitome. This essay focuses on how Edmund Spenser (1552?– 99) appropriated the rhetoric and form of such printed redactions in his rendition of fairy history found in book 2 of The Faerie Queene (1596). Through his abridged fairy chronicle, Spenser connects to a broadly defined reading public, emphasizes the deeds not only of kings but their imperial and civic deputies, and provides an alternative interpretive pathway through his poem.

Type
Research Article
Information
Renaissance Quarterly , Volume 58 , Issue 3 , Fall 2005 , pp. 857 - 880
Copyright
Copyright © 2005 Renaissance Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

I wish to thank the generous and helpful editorial staff and readers at Renaissance Quarterly, my colleagues at Trinity, and my friends and advisors at Columbia — David Kastan, Jean Howard, Robert Stein, and Anne Lake Prescott in particular — who have patiently commented on the many versions of this piece.

References

The Abridgement of the Booke of Assises. London, [1565?]Google Scholar
Anderson, Judith H. “What Comes After Chaucer’s But: Adversative Constructions in Spenser.” In Acts of Interpretation: The Text in its Contexts, 700–1600: Essays on Medieval and Renaissance Literature in Honor of E. Talbot Donaldson, ed. Mary J. Carruthers and Elizabeth D. Kirk, 105–18. Norman, OK, 1982.Google Scholar
Anderson, Judith H. "The Antiquities of Fairyland and Ireland." Journal of English and Germanic Philology 86 no. 2 (1987) : 199 – 214.Google Scholar
Armitage, David. “Literature and Empire.” In The Origins of Empire: British Overseas Enterprise to the Close of the Seventeenth Century, ed. Canny, Nicholas, 99–123. Oxford, 1998.Google Scholar
Ascham, Roger. The Scholemaster. London, 1570.Google Scholar
Baldwin, Thomas Whitfield. William Shakspere’s Small Latine & Lesse Greeke. 2 vols. Urbana, 1944.Google Scholar
Harry, Berger. The Allegorical Temper: Vision and Reality in Book II of Spenser’s ’Faerie Queene’. New Haven, 1957.Google Scholar
Cain, Thomas H. Praise in ’The Faerie Queene’. Lincoln, 1978.Google Scholar
Canny, Nicholas P. The Elizabethan Conquest of Ireland: A Pattern Established, 1565–76. New York, 1976.Google Scholar
Capito, Wolfgang. An Epitome of the Psalmes. Trans. Richard Tauerner. London, 1539.Google Scholar
Carpenter, Frederic Eves. “Spenser Apocrypha.” In The Manly Anniverary Studies in Language and Literature, 64–69. Chicago, 1923.Google Scholar
Christian, Margaret. “’The ground of Storie’: Genealogy in The Faerie Queene.” Spenser Studies 9 (1991): 61–79.Google Scholar
Cicero, Marcus Tullius, Roger Ascham et al. A Panoplie of Epistles, or, a Looking Glasse for the Unlearned. Trans. Abraham Flemming. London, 1576.Google Scholar
Colie, Rosalie Littell. The Resources of Kind: Genre-Theory in the Renaissance. Ed. Barbara K. Lewalski. Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1973.Google Scholar
Cook, Patrick J. Milton, Spenser, and the Epic Tradition. Aldershot and Burlington, VT, 1996.Google Scholar
Curran, John. Roman Invasions: The British History, Protestant Anti-Romanism, and the Historical Imagination in England, 1530–1660. Newark, DE and London, 2002.Google Scholar
Donoghue, Denis. Thieves of Fire. New York, 1974.Google Scholar
Dubrow, Heather. “The Arraignment of Paridell: Tudor Historiography in The Faerie Queene, III.ix." Studies in Philology 87, no. 3 (1990) : 312 – 28.Google Scholar
Eutropius. A Briefe Chronicle.. Trans. Haward, Nicholas. London, 1564.Google Scholar
Eutropius. A Breviary of Roman History... London, 1684.Google Scholar
Eutropius, . The Breviarium Ab Urbe Condita of Eutropius: The Right Honourable Secretary of State for General Petitions: Dedicated to Lord Valens, Gothicus Maximus & Perpetual Emperor. Ed. and trans. Bird, H. W.. Liverpool, 1993.Google Scholar
Fichter, Andrew. Poets Historical: Dynastic Epic in the Renaissance. New Haven, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, Angus . The Prophetic Moment: An Essay on Spenser. Chicago, 1971.Google Scholar
Galbraith, David. Architectonics of Imitation in Spenser, Daniel, and Drayton. Toronto and Buffalo, 2000.10.3138/9781442670945CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galen, . Galens Bookes of Elementes, As They Be in the Epitome. Trans. Jones, John. London, 1574.Google Scholar
Helgerson, Richard. Self-Crowned Laureates: Spenser, Jonson, Milton and the Literary System. Berkeley, 1983.Google Scholar
Helgerson, Richard. Forms of Nationhood: The Elizabethan Writing of England. Chicago, 1992.Google Scholar
Highley, Christopher. Shakespeare, Spenser, and the Crisis in Ireland. Cambridge and New York, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hough, Graham. A Preface to The Faerie Queene. New York, 1962.Google Scholar
Justinus, Marcus Junianus, and Pompeius Trogus. The Abridgement of the Historyes of Trogus Pompeius. Trans. Arthur Golding. London, 1578.Google Scholar
Justinus, Marcus Junianus. The History of Justin, Taken Out of the Four and Fortieth Books of Trogus Pompeius: Containing the Affairs of all Ages and Countrys, both in Peace and War, from the Beginning of the World Until the Time of the Roman Emperors. Trans. Robert Codrington. London, 1682.Google Scholar
King, Andrew. “Lines of Authority: The Genealogical Theme in The Faerie Queene." Spenser Studies 18 (2003) : 59 –77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanquet, Thomas. An Epitome of Chronicles.. Continued.. by Thomas Cooper. London, 1549.Google Scholar
Levy, F. J. Tudor Historical Thought. San Marino, 1967.Google Scholar
Lewis, C. S. The Allegory of Love: A Study in Medieval Tradition. New York, 1938.Google Scholar
Maley, Willy. A Spenser Chronology. Lanham, MD, 1993.Google Scholar
Manley, Lawrence. Literature and Culture in Early Modern London. Cambridge and New York, 1995.Google Scholar
Miller, Jacqueline T.. “The Status of Faeryland: Spenser’s ’Vniust Possession.’" Spenser Studies 5 (1985) : 31 – 44.Google Scholar
Mills, Jerry. “Prudence, History and the Prince in The Faerie Queene, Book II." Huntington Library Quarterly 41 (1978) : 83 – 101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minsheu, John. Ductor in Linguas. London, 1625.Google Scholar
Murrin, Michael. “The Audience of The Faerie Queene.” Explorations in Renaissance Culture 23 (1997): 1–21.10.1163/23526963-90000184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nohrnberg, James. The Analogy of ’The Faerie Queene’. Princeton, 1976.Google Scholar
O’Connell, Michael. Mirror and Veil: The Historical Dimension of Spenser’s ’Faerie Queene’. Chapel Hill, 1977.Google Scholar
Ortelius, Abraham. An Epitome of Ortelius His Theater of the World. . London, 1601.Google Scholar
Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Ed. Matthew, H. C. G. and Harrison, Brian. 60 vols. Oxford and New York, 2004.Google Scholar
Raleigh, Sir Walter, and Ross, Alexander. The Marrow of Historie, Or, an Epitome of all Historical Passages from the Creation to the End of the Last Macedonian War. London, 1650.Google Scholar
Rambuss, Richard. Spenser’s Secret Career. Cambridge and New York, 1993.Google Scholar
Read, David. Temperate Conquests: Spenser and the Spanish New World. Detroit, 2000.Google Scholar
Roche, Thomas P., Jr. ’The Kindly Flame’: A Study of the Third and Fourth Books of Spenser’s ’Faerie Queene’. Ann Arbor, 1964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, Richard. The Practice of Christianitie. . London, 1618.Google Scholar
Rossi, Joan Warchol. “ Briton moniments: Spenser’s Definition of Temperance in History.” English Literary Renaissance 15, no. 1 (1985): 42–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
S., E. De Rebus Gestis Britanniae. . London, 1582.Google Scholar
Sanders, Henry A. Roman Historical Sources and Institutions. New York and London, 1967.Google Scholar
Saunders, J. B. de C. M., and Charles D. O’Malley. The Illustrations from the Works of Andreas Vesalius of Brussels. New York, 1950.Google Scholar
Scoloker, Anthony. A Bryefe Summe of the Whole Byble. London, [1549?]Google Scholar
Smith, Sir William. A New Classical Dictionary of Biography, Mythology, and Geography, Partly Based upon the Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology. London, 1850.Google Scholar
Spenser, Edmund. The Faerie Queene. Ed. A. C. Hamilton. New York, 2001.Google Scholar
Stewart, Alan, and Sullivan, Garrett A., Jr. “’Worme-eaten, and full of canker holes’: Materializing Memory in The Faerie Queene and Lingua.” Spenser Studies 17 (2003): 215–38.Google Scholar
Stow, John. A Summarie of Englyshe Chronicles. . London, 1565.Google Scholar
Summit, Jennifer. “Monuments and Ruins: Spenser and the Problem of the English Library.” English Language History 70, no. 1 (2003): 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Es, Bart. Spenser’s Forms of History. Oxford and New York, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vesalius, Andreas. Compendiosa Totius Anatomie Delineatio. London, 1545.Google Scholar
Webster, John. “Challenging the Commonplace: Teaching as Conversation in Spenser’s Legend of Temperance.” In Approaches to Teaching Spenser’s ’Faerie Queene’, ed. Miller, David Lee and Dunlop, Alexander, 82–92. New York, 1994.Google Scholar
Wheare, Degory . The Method and Order of Reading both Civil and Ecclesiastical Histories.. London, 1685.Google Scholar
White, Hayden V. The Content of the Form: Narrative Discourse and Historical Representation. Baltimore, 1990.Google Scholar
Williams, Kathleen. Spenser’s World of Glass: A Reading of ’The Faerie Queene’. Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1966.Google Scholar
Woodcock, Matthew. Fairy in The Faerie Queene : Renaissance Elf-Fashioning and Elizabethan Myth-Making. Aldershot, 2004.Google Scholar