Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T05:50:08.380Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Testimony, belief, and non-doxastic faith: the Humean argument for religious fictionalism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 June 2015

CHRISTOPHER JAY
CHRISTOPHER JAY*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of York, Heslington, YO10 5DD, UK e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I set out an argument for religious fictionalism which, unusually, proceeds from realist assumptions to the conclusion that even though some people might know that God exists, others ought to accept only non-doxastically that God exists. The argument relies upon the idea that religious experiences can confer immediate warrant on religious beliefs, whereas the warrant conferred by testimony is defeated by some reasonable beliefs which many people have.

Type
Articles
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 52 , Issue 2 , June 2016 , pp. 247 - 261
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alston, William (1991) Perceiving God: The Epistemology of Religious Experience (Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Alston, William (1996) ‘Belief, acceptance, and religious faith’, in Howard-Snyder, Daniel & Jordan, Jeff (eds) Faith, Freedom and Rationality: Philosophy of Religion Today (Lanham MD: Rowman and Littlefield Press), 3–27.Google Scholar
Audi, Robert (2011) Rationality and Religious Commitment (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Burge, Tyler (1993) ‘Content preservation’, Philosophical Review, 102, 457–488.Google Scholar
Cohen, Jonathan L. (1989) ‘Belief and acceptance’, Mind, 98, 367–389.Google Scholar
Cohen, Jonathan L. (1991) An Essay on Belief and Acceptance (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Eshleman, Andrew (2005) ‘Can an atheist believe in God?’, Religious Studies, 41, 183–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faulkner, Paul (2007) ‘On telling and trusting’, Mind, 116, 875–902.Google Scholar
Faulkner, Paul (2011) Knowledge on Trust (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, Hartry (1980) Science without Numbers: A Defense of Nominalism (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar
Field, Hartry (1989) Realism, Mathematics and Modality (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar
French, Craig (forthcoming) ‘The formulation of epistemological disjunctivism’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.Google Scholar
Griffith-Dickson, Gwen (2000) Human and Divine: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Religious Experience (London: Duckworth).Google Scholar
Hasker, William (1998) ‘The foundations of theism: scoring the Quinn–Plantinga debate’, Faith and Philosophy, 15, 52–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard-Snyder, Daniel (2013) ‘Schellenberg on propositional faith’, Religious Studies, 49, 181–194.Google Scholar
Hume, David (1757) Natural History of Religion, in Gaskin, Richard (ed.) Dialogues and Natural History of Religion (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993), 134–196.Google Scholar
Jay, Christopher (2014) ‘The Kantian moral hazard argument for religious fictionalism’, International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 75, 207–232.Google Scholar
Jay, Christopher (ms) ‘Doxastic and nondoxastic atheisms’.Google Scholar
Joyce, Richard (2001) The Myth of Morality (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Joyce, Richard (2005) ‘Moral fictionalism’, in Kalderon, Mark Eli (ed.) Fictionalism in Metaphysics (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 287–313.Google Scholar
Kalderon, Mark Eli (2005) Moral Fictionalism (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1793) Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason, in Wood, A. W. & di Giovanni, G. (eds) Religion and Rational Theology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), 39–215.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1798) The Conflict of the Faculties, in Wood, A. W. & di Giovanni, G. (eds) Religion and Rational Theology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), 233–327.Google Scholar
Le Poidevin, Robin (1996) Arguing for Atheism: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Religion (Oxford: Routledge).Google Scholar
Le Poidevin, Robin (2003) ‘Theistic discourse and fictional truth’, Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 225, 271–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebens, Samuel (2013) ‘The epistemology of religiosity: an orthodox Jewish perspective’, International Journal of Philosophy of Religion, 74, 315–332.Google Scholar
Lipton, Peter (2007) ‘Science and religion: the immersion solution’, in Moore, Andrew & Scott, Michael (eds) Realism and Religion: Philosophical and Theological Perspectives (Aldershot: Ashgate), 31–46.Google Scholar
Mcdowell, John (1994) ‘Knowledge by hearsay’, reprinted in Meaning, Knowledge and Reality (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1991), 195–224.Google Scholar
Plantinga, Alvin (1986) ‘The foundations of theism: a reply’, Faith and Philosophy, 3, 298–313.Google Scholar
Pojman, Louis (1986) ‘Faith without belief?’, Faith and Philosophy, 3, 157–176.Google Scholar
Pryor, James (2000) ‘The skeptic and the dogmatist’, Nous, 34, 517–549.Google Scholar
Quinn, Philip L. (1985) ‘In search of the foundations of theism’, Faith and Philosophy, 2, 469–486.Google Scholar
Quinn, Philip L. (1993) ‘The foundations of theism again: a rejoinder to Plantinga’, in Zagzebski, Linda (ed.) Rational Faith: Catholic Responses to Reformed Epistemology (Notre Dame IN: University of Notre Dame Press), 14–47.Google Scholar
Van Fraassen, Bas (1980) The Scientific Image (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Wettstein, Howard (2012) The Significance of Religious Experience (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Williams, Rowan (2007) Tokens of Trust: An Introduction to Christian Belief (Norwich: Canterbury Press).Google Scholar
Wootton, David (1993) ‘Hume, “the historian”’, in Norton, David Fate (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Hume (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 281–312.Google Scholar