Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T12:34:04.983Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Prayers for the past

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 August 2005

KEVIN TIMPE
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of San Diego, 5998 Alcalá Park, San Diego, CA 92110-2492

Abstract

All three of the world's major monotheistic religions traditionally affirm that petitionary prayers can be causally efficacious in bringing about certain states of affairs. Most of these prayers are offered before the state of affairs that they are aimed at helping bring about. In the present paper, I explore the possibility of whether petitionary prayers for the past can also be causally efficacious. Assuming an incompatibilist account of free will, I examine four views in philosophical theology (simple foreknowledge, eternalism, Molinism, and openism) and argue that the first three have the resources to account for the efficacy of past-directed prayers, while the latter does not. I further suggest that on those views which affirm the possible efficacy of past-directed petitionary prayers, such prayers can be ‘impetratory’ even if the agent already knows that the desired state of affairs has obtained.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2005 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)