Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T03:07:26.242Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Practical considerations and evidence in James's permission to believe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 June 2014

DAVID M. HOLLEY
DAVID M. HOLLEY*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy and Religion, The University of Southern Mississippi, 118 College Drive # 5015, Hattiesburg, Mississippi 39406, USA e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Philosophers often read ‘The will to believe’ as defending the substitution of non-epistemic reasons for inadequate epistemic reasons. I contend that a more charitable reading of James's argument is to understand him as proposing a contextualist account of the kind of evidence needed for responsible believing. On my reading, James claims that evidential support that might be insufficient in a purely theoretical context may be good enough when there is a pressing need to decide on a course of action.

Type
Articles
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 51 , Issue 1 , March 2015 , pp. 21 - 39
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bishop, John (2007) Believing By Faith: An Essay in the Epistemology and Ethics of Religious Belief (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Hunter (2000) William James on Radical Empiricism and Religion (Toronto: University of Toronto Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Kelly (2008) Readings in the Philosophy of Religion, 2nd edn (Peterborough ON: Broadview Press).Google Scholar
Clifford, William Kingdon (1999 [1877]) ‘The ethics of belief’, in The Ethics of Belief and Other Essays (Amherst NY: Prometheus Books), 70–96.Google Scholar
Davis, Stephen (1972) ‘Wishful thinking and “The will to believe”’, Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 8, 231–245.Google Scholar
Dooley, Patrick (1972) ‘The nature of belief: the proper context for James’ “The will to believe”’, Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 8, 141–151.Google Scholar
Feldman, Richard (2006) ‘Clifford's principle and James's options’, Social Epistemology, 20, 19–33.Google Scholar
Foley, Richard (2005) ‘Justified belief as responsible belief’, in Steup, Matthias & Sosa, Ernest (eds) Contemporary Debates in Epistemology (Boston MA: Wiley-Blackwell), 313–326.Google Scholar
Franks, Christopher (2004) ‘Passion and the will to believe’, The Journal of Religion, 84, 431–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gale, Richard M. (1980) ‘William James and the ethics of belief’, American Philosophical Quarterly, 17, 1–14.Google Scholar
Gale, Richard M. (2007) On the Philosophy of Religion (Belmont CA: Wadsworth).Google Scholar
Gordon, Jeffrey (1993) ‘The rational imperative to believe’, Religious Studies, 29, 1–19.Google Scholar
Holley, David M. (2011) ‘How can a believer doubt that God exists?’, The Philosophical Quarterly, 61, 746–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, William (1961 [1902]) The Varieties of Religious Experience (New York: Collier Publishing Company).Google Scholar
James, William (1977 [1880]) ‘The sentiment of rationality’, in McDermott, John J. (ed.) The Writings of William James: A Comprehensive Edition (Chicago: University of Chicago Press), 317–345.Google Scholar
James, William (1979a [1881]) ‘Reflex action and theism’ in Burkhardt, Frederick et al. (eds) The Will to Believe and Other Essays in Popular Philosophy (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press), 90–113.Google Scholar
James, William (1979b [1884]) ‘The dilemma of determinism’, in Burkhardt, Frederick et al. (eds) The Will to Believe and Other Essays in Popular Philosophy (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press), 114–140.Google Scholar
James, William (1979c [1896]) ‘The will to believe’, in The Will to Believe, in Burkhardt, Frederick et al. (eds.) The Will to Believe and Other Essays in Popular Philosophy (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press), 13–33.Google Scholar
James, William (1979d [1911]) ‘Faith and the Right to Believe’, in Burkhardt, Frederick et al. (eds) Some Problems of Philosophy (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press), 111–117.Google Scholar
Johanson, Arnold (1975) ‘“The will to believe” and the ethics of belief’, Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 11, 110–127.Google Scholar
Kvanvig, Jonathan (2011) ‘Against pragmatic encroachment’, Logos & Episteme, 2, 77–85.Google Scholar
Mavrodes, George (1986) ‘Intellectual morality in Clifford and James’, in McCarthy, Gerald D. (ed.) The Ethics of Belief Debate (Atlanta GA: Scholars Press), 205–219.Google Scholar
Montmarquet, James (2007) ‘“Pure” versus “practical” epistemic justification’, Metaphilosophy, 38, 71–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nathanson, Stephen (1982) ‘Nonevidential reasons for belief: a Jamesian view’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 42, 572–580.Google Scholar
O'Connell, Robert J. (1997) William James and the Courage to Believe (New York: Fordham University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, R. B. (1935) The Thought and Character of William James, II (Boston MA: Little Brown and Company).Google Scholar
Pojman, Louis (2001) Philosophy of Religion (Mountain View CA: Mayfield Publishing Company).Google Scholar
Pace, Michael (2011) ‘The epistemic value of moral considerations: justification, moral encroachment, and James’ “Will to Believe”’, Nous, 45, 239–268.Google Scholar
Riggs, Wayne D. (2003) ‘Balancing our epistemic goals’, Nous, 37, 342–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowe, William (2007) Philosophy of Religion: An Introduction, 4th edn (Belmont CA: Thomson Wadsworth).Google Scholar
Schlecht, Ludwig (1997) ‘Re-reading “The will to believe” ’, Religious Studies, 33, 217–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wainwright, William (1991) ‘James, rationality and religious belief’, Religious Studies, 27, 223–238.Google Scholar
Wainwright, William (1995) Reason and the Heart: A Prolegomenon to a Critique of Practical Reason (Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Yeager, D. M. (1989) ‘Passion and suspicion: religious affections in “The will to believe”’, The Journal of Religion, 69, 467–483.Google Scholar