No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
On nail scissors and toothbrushes: responding to the philosophers' critiques of Historical Biblical Criticism
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 September 2012
Abstract
The rise in interdisciplinary scholarship between philosophy and theology has produced a number of critiques of historical biblical criticism (HBC) by philosophers of religion. Some dialogue has resulted, but these critiques have gone largely unnoticed by historical critical scholars. This article argues that two such critiques of HBC, offered by Plantinga and Stump, are undermined by faulty presuppositions on the philosophers' part regarding the nature and value of HBC and misunderstandings of the nature of the ancient texts on which the discipline of HBC focuses.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012