Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T16:31:30.332Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Objective Study of Religion and the Unique Quality of Religiousness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

Frederick J. Streng
Frederick J. Streng
Affiliation:
Associate Professor of the History of Religions, Southern Methodist University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The attempt to study religion objectively (Religionswissenschaft) has been part of the academic scene in the West for a century. Such men as F. Max Mueller, Edward Tylor, W. Brede Kristenson, Raffaele Peettazzoni, and Joachim Wach worked to develop such a truly scientific study of religion. They held that a study of religious data could reveal what religious life means for people who participate in it if methods are used which prevent a superimposition of the investigator's personal value judgments. At the same time, there has been the recognition by some scholars, including some of the above, that there is something about religious life that cannot be investigated by normal empirical methods. This sense of the uniqueness of religion is symbolised in Rudolf Otto's book The Idea of the Holy, where he maintains that in order to understand religion in its innermost core, an investigator must recognise ‘a unique “numinous” category of value and of a definitely “numinous” state of mind’. Our concern here is to examine one problem arising from the claim that religious life must be studied in terms of its own intention, or category of value; and yet studied through an inductive method which allows for the distinctive character of different historical expressions of religion.

Type
Articles
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 6 , Issue 3 , September 1970 , pp. 209 - 219
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 209 note 1 The Idea of the Holy, trs. Harvey, J. W. (New York: Oxford University Press), p. 7.Google Scholar

page 211 note 1 The Idea of the Holy, trs. Harvey, J. W. (New York: Oxford University Press), p. 7.Google Scholar

page 211 note 2 ibid.

page 211 note 3 ibid., p. II, note.

page 212 note 1 Eliade, M., The Sacred and the Profane, trs. Trask, W. R. (New York: Harcourt, Brace and Co., 1959), p. 11.Google Scholar

page 212 note 2 Eliade, M., Patterns in Comparative Religion, trs. Sheed, R. (New York: Sheed and Ward, 1958), pp. xi–xv.Google Scholar

page 212 note 3 The Sacred and the Profane, p. II.

page 212 note 4 ibid., p. 14.

page 212 note 5 ibid., pp. 12–13.

page 212 note 6 ibid., p. 17. See also Eliade, M., Cosmos and History, trs. Trask, W. R. (New York: Harper and Brothers, 1959)Google Scholar, Chapter 4.

page 213 note 1 Patterns in Comparative Religion, p. 462.

page 213 note 2 Wach, J., The Comparative Study of Religions, Kitagawa, J. M., ed. (New York: Columbia University Press, 1958), p. 30.Google Scholar

page 213 note 3 ibid., pp. 30–36.

page 214 note 1 Kristensen, W. B., The Meaning of Religion, trs. Carman, J. B. (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1960), p. 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 214 note 2 ibid., p. 17.

page 214 note 3 ibid., p. 2.

page 214 note 4 ibid., p. 3.

page 214 note 5 5 ibid.

page 215 note 1 Smith, W. C., The Meaning and End of Religion (New York: Macmillan, 1962), p. 182.Google Scholar

page 215 note 2 ibid., p. 183.

page 215 note 3 Phänomenologie der Religion (Tubingen: J. C. B. Mohr, 1933).Google Scholar

page 215 note 4 van der Leeuw, G., Religion in Essence and Manifestation (New York: Harper and Row, 1963) p. 675.Google Scholar

page 216 note 1 Religion in Essence and Manifestation, p. 684.

page 216 note 2 ibid., p. 23.

page 216 note 3 ibid., p. 27.