Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T06:08:29.467Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A naturalist cosmological argument

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 August 2017

BRIAN LEFTOW
BRIAN LEFTOW*
Affiliation:
Oriel College, Oxford OX1 4EW, UK
*
e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I rebut a ‘naturalist’ counter to Swinburne's Bayesian cosmological argument, based on the supposedly superior simplicity of naturalism.

Type
Articles
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 53 , Special Issue 3: In Honour of Richard Swinburne , September 2017 , pp. 321 - 338
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Coggins, Geraldine (2010) Could There Have Been Nothing? (London: Palgrave Macmillan).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gale, Richard (1991) On the Nature and Existence of God (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Lange, Mark (2013) ‘Are some things naturally necessary?’, in Goldschmidt, Tyron (ed.) The Puzzle of Existence (Abingdon: Routledge), 235–251.Google Scholar
Leftow, Brian (2004) ‘Anselm's perfect being theology’, in Davies, Brian & Leftow, Brian (eds) The Cambridge Companion to Anselm (New York: Cambridge University Press), 132–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leftow, Brian (2010) ‘Swinburne on divine necessity’,’ Religious Studies, 46, 141–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leftow, Brian (2012) God and Necessity (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowe, E. J. (1996) ‘Why is there anything at all?’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, supp. vol. 70, 111–120.Google Scholar
Maitzen, Stephen (2013) ‘Questioning the question’, in Goldschmidt, Tyron (ed.) The Puzzle of Existence (Abingdon: Routledge), 252–271.Google Scholar
Oppy, Graham (2012) ‘God’, in Manson, Neil & Barnard, Robert (eds) The Continuum Companion to Metaphysics (London: Continuum), 283–307.Google Scholar
Oppy, Graham (2013a) ‘Ultimate naturalistic causal explanations’, in Goldschmidt, Tyron (ed.) The Puzzle of Existence (Abingdon: Routledge), 46–63.Google Scholar
Oppy, Graham (2013b) The Best Possible Argument Against God (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rea, Michael (2002) World without Design (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swinburne, Richard (1994) The Christian God (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swinburne, Richard (2004) The Existence of God, 2nd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vetter, Barbara (2014) Potentiality (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar