No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 October 2008
To read the Bible ‘like any other book’: that is one of the striking phrases in Benjamin Jowett's sprawling essay – it is over roo pages long – ‘On the Interpretation of Scripture’ in Essays and Reviews (1860; cf. pp. 338, 375, 377, 404 of that edition, which is quoted without further reference throughout this article). Another memorable phrase concerned the ‘original’ meaning: ‘the office of the interpreter is not to add another [meaning], but to recover the original one; the meaning, that is, of the words as they first struck on the ears or flashed before the eyes of those who heard and read them’ (p. 338).
page 433 note 2 So recently, for example, Professor Brevard Childs in ‘The Sensus Literalis of Scripture: an Ancient and Modern Problem’, in Donner, H., Hanhart, R. and Smend, R., Beiträge zur alttestamentlichen Theologie (Zimmerli Festschrift; Göttingen, Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht, 1977), pp. 80–93; reference to Jowett, p. 89.Google Scholar
page 434 note 1 ‘Jowett was never historical about the Fathers (or about much else)’: Chadwick, O., The Secularization of the European Mind in the Nineteenth Century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975), p. 150.Google Scholar
page 437 note 1 For another recent assessment of Jowett see Hinchliff, P., ‘Benjamin Jowett and the Church of England: or “Why really great men are never Clergymen”’, forthcoming in Balliol Studies.Google Scholar