Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T01:47:27.005Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The idolatry argument against natural theology: how it works and why it fails

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2015

HUGH BURLING
HUGH BURLING*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Divinity, University of Cambridge, St John's College, Cambridge, CB2 1TP, UK e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Some thinkers in the Reformed and ‘postmodern’ traditions in theology have argued that natural theology is ‘idolatrous’. This article shows that such arguments hinge on distinguishing the object of revealed theology from the perfect being or first cause. It then shows that, on plausible analyses of worthiness of worship, the perfect being will always be more worthy of worship than anything not identified with it. Natural theology therefore has a proper place in investigating the nature of the ‘true’ God, if an object is the ‘true’ God because it is the being worthy of our worship.

Type
Articles
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 51 , Special Issue 3: Religious Studies at 50 , September 2015 , pp. 401 - 410
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barth, K. (1936) Church Dogmatics, I. I, Thomson, G. (tr.) (Edinburgh: T & T Clark).Google Scholar
Barth, K. (1957) Church Dogmatics, II, Bromiley, G. and Torrance, T. (eds) (Edinburgh: T & T Clark).Google Scholar
Bayne, T. & Nagasawa, Y. (2006) ‘The grounds of worship’, Religious Studies, 42, 299–313.Google Scholar
Bayne, T. & Nagasawa, Y. (2007) ‘The grounds of worship again: a reply to Crow’, Religious Studies, 43, 475–480.Google Scholar
Berkouwer, G. C. (1979) General Revelation (Grand Rapids MI: Eerdmans).Google Scholar
Brunner, E. (1950) The Christian Doctrine of God, Wyatt, O. (tr.) (Philadelphia: Westminster Press).Google Scholar
Crowe, B. D. (2007) ‘Reasons for worship: a response to Bayne & Nagasawa’, Religious Studies, 43, 465–474.Google Scholar
Findlay, J. (1955) ‘Can God's existence be disproved? A’, in Flew, A. & MacIntyre, A (eds) New Essays in Philosophical Theology (London: SCM Press), 47–56.Google Scholar
Gwiazda, J. (2011) ‘Worship and threshold obligations’, Religious Studies, 47, 521–525.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. (2002) Identity and Difference, Stambaugh, J. (tr.) (London: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Lecerf, A. (1949) An Introduction to Reformed Dogmatics (London: Lutterworth Press).Google Scholar
Marion, J. (1991) God without Being, Carlson, T. (tr.) (London: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Morris, T. (1987) Anselmian Explorations: Essays in Philosophical Theology (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press).Google Scholar
Sudduth, M. (2009) The Reformed Objection to Natural Theology (Farnham: Ashgate).Google Scholar
Westphal, M. (2001) Overcoming Onto-Theology (New York: Fordham University Press).Google Scholar