Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T03:52:38.186Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Identity and the composite Christ: an incarnational dilemma

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 February 2009

ROBIN LE POIDEVIN
ROBIN LE POIDEVIN
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

One way of understanding the reduplicative formula ‘Christ is, qua God, omniscient, but qua man, limited in knowledge’ is to take the occurrences of the ‘qua’ locution as picking out different parts of Christ: a divine part and a human part. But this view of Christ as a composite being runs into paradox when combined with the orthodox understanding of the Incarnation, according to which Christ is identical to the second person of the Trinity. In response, we have to choose between modifying the orthodox understanding, adopting a philosophically and theologically contentious perdurantist account of persistence through time, or rejecting altogether the idea of the composite Christ.

Type
Articles
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 45 , Issue 2 , June 2009 , pp. 167 - 186
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bayne, Tim (2001) ‘The inclusion model of the Incarnation: problems and prospects’, Religious Studies, 37, 125–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, David (1985) The Divine Trinity (London: Duckworth).Google Scholar
Chisholm, Robert (1973) ‘Parts as essential to their wholes’, Review of Metaphysics 26, 581–603.Google Scholar
Cottingham, John, Robert, Stoothof, & Dugald, Murdoch (1984) (trans. and eds), The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, II (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald (1970) ‘Mental events’, reprinted in idem Essays on Actions and Events (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980), 207–225.Google Scholar
Davis, D., Daniel, Kendall, & Gerald, O'Collins (eds) (2002) The Incarnation (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, C. Stephen (2006) Exploring Kenotic Christology: The Self-Emptying of God (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geach, Peter (1967–1968) ‘Identity’, Review of Metaphysics 21, 3–12.Google Scholar
Geach, Peter (1980) Reference and Generality, 3rd edn (Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Hebblethwaite, Brian (1987) The Incarnation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heller, Mark (1984) ‘Temporal parts of four-dimensional objects’, Philosophical Studies 46, 323–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helm, Paul (1988) Eternal God (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Henessey, R. J. (ed.) (1975) St Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologiae, Blackfriars edn, XLVIII (London: Eyre and Spottiswoode).Google Scholar
Herbert, R. T. (1979) Paradox and Identity in Theology (Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Johnston, Mark (1987) ‘Is there a problem about persistence?’, Aristotelian Society supplementary volume LXI, 107–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leftow, Brian (2002) ‘A timeless God incarnate’, in Davis et al. (2002), 273–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noonan, Harold (1993) ‘Constitution is identity: response to Mark Johnston’, Mind, 102, 133–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Neill, C. J. (1957) St Thomas Aquinas, Summa Contra Gentiles, IV (Notre Dame IN: University of Notre Dame Press).Google Scholar
Sider, Theodore (2001) Four Dimensionalism: An Ontology of Persistence and Time, (Oxford: Clarendon Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, J. (1989) Creeds, Councils and Controversies: Documents Illustrating the Early History of the Church 373–561 (London: SPCK).Google Scholar
Stevenson, Robert Louis (2002), The Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde and Other Tales of Terror, Robert, Mighall (ed.) (London: Penguin).Google Scholar
Stump, Eleonore (2002) ‘Aquinas' metaphysics of the Incarnation’, in Davis et al. (2002), 197–218.Google Scholar
Swinburne, Richard (1989) ‘Could God become man?’, in Godfrey, Vesey (ed.) The Philosophy in Christianity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 53–70.Google Scholar
Thomson, Judith Jarvis (1983) ‘Parthood and identity across time’, Journal of Philosophy, 80, 201–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Inwagen, Peter (1981) ‘The doctrine of arbitrary undetached parts’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 62, 23–37; repr. in idem Ontology, Identity and Modality (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001), 75–94. (Page references in-text to reprinted version.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Inwagen, Peter (1990) Material Beings (Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press), 98–107.Google Scholar
van Inwagen, Peter (1995) God, Knowledge and Mystery: Essays in Philosophical Theology (Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, C. J. F. (1968) ‘A programme for Christology’, Religious Studies, 3, 513–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar