Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-18T15:59:46.398Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘God told me to do it’: sceptical theism and perceiving God

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2011

JOSHUA SEIGAL
JOSHUA SEIGAL*
Affiliation:
Brasenose College, Oxford OX1 4AJ
*
e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this article I highlight a tension between Alston's core thesis in his seminal book Perceiving God – that beliefs about God formed on the basis of mystical perception are prima facie justified – and a currently popular method for disarming a certain form of the argument from evil, a method which involves adopting a view known as sceptical theism.

Type
Articles
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 48 , Issue 1 , March 2012 , pp. 95 - 100
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, R. M. (1994) ‘Religious disagreements and doxastic practices’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54, 885–890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alston, W. P. (1991) Perceiving God: The Epistemology of Religious Experience (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Alston, W. P. (1996) ‘Some (temporarily) final thoughts on evidential arguments from evil’, in Howard-Snyder, D. (ed.) The Evidential Argument From Evil (Bloomington: Indiana University Press), 311–332.Google Scholar
Gale, R. (1994a) ‘The overall argument of Alston's Perceiving God’, Religious Studies 30, 135–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gale, R. (1994b) ‘Why Alston's mystical doxastic practice is subjective’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54, 869–875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I. (1979) The Conflict of the Faculties, M. J. Gregor (tr.) (Norwalk: Abaris Books).Google Scholar
Martin, C. B. (1959) Religious Belief (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Plantinga, A. (1996) ‘Epistemic probability and evil’, in Howard-Snyder, D. (ed.) The Evidential Argument from Evil (Bloomington: Indiana University Press), 69–97.Google Scholar
Rissler, J. D. (2002) ‘A psychological constraint on obedience to God's commands: the reasonableness of obeying the abhorrently evil’, Religious Studies 38, 125–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowe, W. L. (1979) ‘The problem of evil and some varieties of atheism’, American Philosophical Quarterly 16, 335–341.Google Scholar
Rowe, W. L. (1982) ‘Religious experience and the principle of credulity’, International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 13, 85–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steup, M. (1997) ‘Critical study: William Alston, Perceiving God: the epistemology of religious experience’, Nous 31, 408–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turri, J. (2008) ‘Practical and epistemic justification in Alston's Perceiving God’, Faith and Philosophy 25, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wykstra, S. J. (1984) ‘The Humean obstacle to evidential arguments from suffering: on avoiding the evils of “appearance” ’, International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 16, 73–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar