Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T01:11:12.781Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

E. J. Lowe on the modal ontological argument

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2019

DAN-JOHAN EKLUND
DAN-JOHAN EKLUND*
Affiliation:
The Department of Systematic Theology, Faculty of Theology, P.O. Box 4, 00014 University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
*
e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

E. J. Lowe has defended a modal ontological argument that draws upon Plantinga's version. Briefly, the argument is this: God is a necessary being; possibly, God exists; hence, God exists. In this article, I accept the validity of Lowe's modal ontological argument and focus on how he seeks to justify the argument's possibility claim in reference to his essence-based account of modal knowledge. I argue that here Lowe's defence fails. I have two complaints. I call them ‘the modified “perfect island” objection’ and ‘the conflicting possibilities objection’. Both of these refer to the concern that Lowe's modal epistemology is too permissive: it permits justification of possibility claims that question the acceptability of the underlying modal epistemology.

Type
Original Article
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 56 , Issue 4 , December 2020 , pp. 611 - 622
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Fine, Kit (1994) ‘Essence and modality’, Philosophical Perspectives, 8, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guleserian, Theodore (1983) ‘God and possible worlds: the modal problem of evil’, Noûs, 17, 221–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henle, Paul (1961) ‘Uses of the ontological argument’, The Philosophical Review, 70, 102–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hintikka, Jaakko (1969) ‘Existential presuppositions and their elimination’, in Hintikka, J. (ed.) Models for Modalities (Dordrecht: Reidel), 23–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horvath, Joachim (2014) ‘Lowe on modal knowledge’, Thought, 3, 208–217.Google Scholar
Lowe, E. J. (2008) ‘Two notions of being: entity and essence’, in Le Poidevin, R. (ed.) Being: Developments in Contemporary Metaphysics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 23–48.Google Scholar
Lowe, E. J. (2012) ‘What is the source of our knowledge of modal truths?’, Mind, 121, 919–950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowe, E. J. (2013a) ‘A modal version of the ontological argument’, in Moreland, J. P., Sweis, K. A., & Meister, C. (eds) Debating Christian Theism (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 61–71.Google Scholar
Lowe, E. J. (2013b) ‘The ontological argument’, in Meister, C. & Copan, P. (eds) Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Religion (London: Routledge), 391–400.Google Scholar
Lowe, E. J. (2014) ‘Grasp of essences versus intuitions: an unequal contest’, in Booth, A. & Rowbottom, D. (eds) Intuitions (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 256–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, Thomas (1987) Anselmian Explorations: Essays in Philosophical Theology (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press).Google Scholar
Oppy, Graham (1995) Ontological Arguments and Belief in God (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Oppy, Graham (2013) ‘Lowe on “the ontological argument”’, in Moreland, J. P., Sweis, K. A., & Meister, C. (eds) Debating Christian Theism (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 72–82.Google Scholar
Plantinga, Alvin (1974) The Nature of Necessity (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Tahko, Tuomas (2017) ‘Empirically-informed modal rationalism’, in Fischer, R. W. & Leon, F. (eds) Modal Epistemology after Rationalism (Dordrecht: Springer), 29–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaidya, Anand (2015) ‘The epistemology of modality’, in Zalta, E. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2017 Edition), <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/modality-epistemology/>.Google Scholar
Vallicella, William F. (2015) ‘Divine simplicity’, in Zalta, E. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2018 Edition), <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2018/entries/divine-simplicity/>.Google Scholar
van Inwagen, Peter (2006) The Problem of Evil (Oxford: Clarendon Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar