Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T09:11:53.159Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Development of Otto's Thought 1898–1917: From Luther's View of the Holy Spirit to the Holy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

Robin Minney
Robin Minney
Affiliation:
University of Durham, England
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The purpose of this paper is to outline the developments in the thinking of Rudolf Otto, as far as possible through his theology, philosophy, psychology and phenomenology. The fact that Otto's interests took him into so many fields at once suggests serious breaks and inconsistencies in his work. This paper, however, will argue for a consistency in his thought and development. To achieve this requires an appreciation of the close connection he felt to exist between his philosophy and psychology, the theoretical and the empirical. We know that Otto was strongly influenced by the philosophy of J. Fr. Fries. Yet it is by no means necessary to agree either with Fries or with what Otto made of Fries' system in order to trace continuity. We simply need to understand Otto's development in the context of the time.

Type
Research Article
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 26 , Issue 4 , December 1990 , pp. 505 - 524
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 ZThK, 1938, p. 3.

2 IH 99–100; DH 123.

3 ThLZ, 1917, p. 305.

4 (1) CW 1903 pp. 506–12, and (2) SU 1932 pp. 123–39.

5 Darwinismus und Religion, Abhandlungen der Fries' schen Schule, NF vol. 3 (Göttingen, 1909), pp. 14–40.

6 CW 1930, pp. 4–11, 113–19.

7 SU S. 197 (not in RE).

8 MTS Nr. 3, 5–7.

9 Theologische Blätter (1928), 101.

10 Holm, S., ‘A priori und Urphänomen bei Rudolf Otto’, in Benz, E. (ed.), Rudolf Ottos Bedeutung für die Religionswissenschaft und die Theologie heute (Leiden, 1971)Google Scholar.

11 Bastow, D., ‘Otto and the Numinous Experience’, in Religious Studi1es (June 1976), pp. 159–76.Google Scholar

12 Neue Zeitschrift für systematische Theologie (1983), 52–67.Google Scholar