Article contents
Design—A Further Reply to R. G. Swinburne1
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 October 2008
Abstract
- Type
- A Reply To
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1973
References
page 229 note 2 This is why we cannot accept Swinburne's suggestion (D2, p. 202) that when the mind acts on the brain the difference it causes lies within the quantum limit.
page 231 note 1 But note that it could be claimed that what the god tried to bring about intentionally, and indirectly, are certain brain states which are directly produced by human agents. Here, as else-where, there is a curious parallel to Berkeley.
- 1
- Cited by