Article contents
Can Philosophers Limit What Mystics Can Do? A Critique of Steven Katz
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 October 2008
Extract
Some philosophers such as Ninian Smart have claimed that mystics from different religious traditions may sometimes have the same experience, while nevertheless giving different and tradition-bound descriptive reports of that experience. In two important essays, Steven Katz has challenged such a claim. Mystics from different religious traditions do not have the same experience.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989
References
1 (1): Katz, Steven, ‘Language, Epistemology and Mysticism’, in Katz, Steven, ed., Mysticism and Philosophical Analysis (New York: Oxford University Press, 1978), pp. 22–74.Google Scholar
(II): Katz, Steven ‘The “Conservative” Character of Mysticism’ in Katz, Steven, ed., Mysticism and Religious Traditions (New York: Oxford University Press, 1983), pp. 3–60.Google Scholar
2 I first heard this description of God in a paper given by Benoit Garceau, a Christian philosopher at the University of Ottawa.
3 Cited by Underhill, Evelyn in her Mysticism, 12th edition (London: Methuen, 1952), p. 399.Google Scholar
4 Concerning Eckhart I am here expounding the transition from his second stage to his third and fourth stages as this transition is presented by Fox, Matthew in Breakthrough (Garden City, N.Y.: Image Books, 1980).Google Scholar
- 9
- Cited by