Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T03:29:35.731Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Buddhist reconfiguration of John Hick's pluralistic hypothesis: a Madhyamaka perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2020

XUAN ZHAO Open the ORCID record for XUAN ZHAO [Opens in a new window]
XUAN ZHAO*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of Macau, Avenida da Universidade, Macau, SAR, China
*
e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In presenting his theory of religious pluralism, John Hick discussed the Buddhist concept of śūnyatā, emptiness, which he regarded as functionally equivalent to his postulated noumenal Real. This article introduces Hick's pluralistic hypothesis and reviews the major criticisms of his theory. It then investigates Hick's understanding of śūnyatā, before arguing that a Madhyamaka interpretation of śūnyatā, within the context of the Buddhist theory of ‘two truths’, differs considerably from Hick's understanding. The article suggests that the Madhyamaka interpretation of śūnyatā can be used to reconfigure Hick's pluralistic hypothesis, thereby avoiding the major criticisms Hickian pluralism faces, for it provides a new way of thinking about the relation between ultimate reality and the reality that we experience.

Type
Religious Studies Postgraduate Essay Prize
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 58 , Issue 1 , March 2022 , pp. 180 - 196
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abe, M. (1985) Zen and Western Thought (Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barua, A. (2015) ‘Hick and Radhakrishnan on religious diversity: back to the Kantian noumenon’, Sophia: International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 54, 181–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burley, M. (2018) ‘Religious pluralisms: from homogenization to radicality’, Sophia, <https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-017-0636-3>.CrossRef.>Google Scholar
Byrne, P. (1982) ‘John Hick's philosophy of world religions’, Scottish Journal of Theology, 35, 289–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'costa, G. (1996) ‘The impossibility of a pluralist view of religions’, Religious Studies, 3, 223–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'costa, G., Kellenberger, J., & Hick, J. (1991) ‘John Hick and religious pluralism: yet another revolution’, in Hewitt, H. (ed.) Problems in the Philosophy of Religion: Critical Studies of the work of John Hick (New York: Palgrave Macmillan), 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eddy, P. R. (1994) ‘Religious pluralism and the divine: another look at John Hick's Neo-Kantian proposal’, Religious Studies, 30, 467–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eddy, P. R. (2018) John Hick's Pluralist Philosophy of World Religions (Eugene OR: Wipf & Stock).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garfield, J. L. (tr.) (1995) The Fundamental Wisdom of the Middle Way: Nāgārjuna's Mūlamadhyamakakārikā (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Garfield, J. L. (2014) ‘Madhyamaka, nihilism, and the emptiness of emptiness’, in Liu, J. & Berger, D. (eds) Nothingness in Asian Philosophy (New York & London: Routledge), 44–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garfield, J. L. (2015) Engaging Buddhism: Why It Matters to Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garfield, J. L. & Westerhoff, J. (2015) Madhyamaka and Yogacara: Allies or Rivals? (New York: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gudmunsen, C. (1977) Wittgenstein and Buddhism (Basingstoke: Macmillan).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, V. S. (2006) ‘Internal realism and the problem of religious diversity’, Philosophia, 34, 287–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, V. S. (2015) ‘Religious pluralism’, in Oppy, G. (ed.) The Routledge Handbook of Contemporary Philosophy of Religion (Abingdon: Routledge), 257–261.Google Scholar
Hick, J. (1984) ‘The philosophy of world religions’, Scottish Journal of Theology, 37, 229–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hick, J. (1991) ‘On grading religions’, in A., Loades & Rue, L. D. (eds) Contemporary Classics in the Philosophy of Religion (La Salle IL: Open Court), 449–470.Google Scholar
Hick, J. (2004) An Interpretation of Religion: Human Responses to the Transcendent, 2nd edn (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hick, J. (2013) The Fifth Dimension: An Exploration of the Spiritual Realm (Oxford: Oneworld Publications).Google Scholar
Ives, C. (2008) ‘Emptiness in Mahāyāna Buddhism’, in Eshleman, A. (ed.) Readings in Philosophy of Religion: East Meets West (Malden MA: Blackwell), 52–58.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1998) The Critique of Pure Reason, Guyer, P. & Wood, A. W. (trs & eds) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, J. H. (1998) ‘Problems of religious pluralism: a Zen critique of John Hick's ontological monomorphism’, Philosophy East and West, 48, 453–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mavrodes, G. (2010), ‘Response to John Hick’, in Hick, J., Dialogues in the Philosophy of Religion (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan), 62–69.Google Scholar
Mckim, R. (2012) On Religious Diversity (Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Napper, E. (1989) Dependent-Arising and Emptiness: A Tibetan Buddhist Interpretation of Madhyamika Philosophy Emphasizing the Compatibility of Emptiness and Conventional Phenomena (Boston MA: Wisdom Publications).Google Scholar
Netland, H. (1991) Dissonant Voices: Religious Pluralism and the Quest for Truth (Leicester: Apollos).Google Scholar
Pine, R. (tr.) (2005) The Heart Sūtra (Prajñāpāramitāhṛdaya) (Washington DC: Shoemaker & Hoard).Google Scholar
Plantinga, A. (2000) Warranted Christian Belief (New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Priest, G. (2018) The Fifth Corner of the Four: An Essay on Buddhist Metaphysics and the Catuṣkoṭi (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, K. (1996) Knowing the Real: John Hick on the Cognitivity of Religions and Religious Pluralism (New York: Peter Lang).Google Scholar
Rowe, W. (1999) ‘Religious pluralism’, Religious Studies, 35, 139–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt-Leukel, P. (2017) Religious Pluralism and Interreligious Theology (Maryknoll NY: Orbis Books).Google Scholar
Shinran (1979) Notes on ‘Essentials of Faith Alone’: A Translation of Shinran's Yuishinshō-mon'I, Ueda, Yoshifumi (tr.) (Kyoto: Hongwanji International Centre).Google Scholar
Shulman, E. (2014) Rethinking the Buddha: Early Buddhist Philosophy as Meditative Perception (New York: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siderits, M. (2016) Studies in Buddhist Philosophy (New York: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan Luan, (1934) Annotation of the Rebirth Treatise (往生论注), in Junjiro, Takakusu (ed.) Taishō Tripiṭaka (大正藏), XL (Taibei: Xin Wenye Press).Google Scholar
Thakchöe, S. (2007) The Two Truth Debate: Tsongkhapa and Gorampa on the Middle Way (Boston MA: Wisdom Publications).Google Scholar
Tsongkhapa, J. (1988) The Principal Teachings of Buddhism, Tharchin, Geshe Lobsang (tr.) (Howell NJ: Mahayana Sutra & Tantra Press).Google Scholar
Tsongkhapa, J. (2006) Ocean of Reason: A Great Commentary on Nāgārjuna's Mūlamadhyamakakārikā, Samten, G. N. & Garfield, J. L. (trs) (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Westerhoff, J. (2009) Nāgārjuna's Madhyamaka (New York: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, P. (2008) Mahāyāna Buddhism: The Doctrinal Foundations, 2nd edn (London & New York: Routledge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yandell, K. (1999) Philosophy of Religion: A Contemporary Introduction (London & New York: Routledge).Google Scholar