No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Atonement: response to critics
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 November 2019
Abstract
In this article, I respond to articles by Faith Pawl, Anne Jeffrey, and Kathryn Pogin that raise issues related to my book Atonement. The topics covered include the suffering of beasts, the necessity of Christ's atonement, the relationship of my interpretation of the doctrine of the atonement and that of Thomas Aquinas, and social and communal guilt and shame.
- Type
- Book Symposium
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019
References
Pawl, Faith (2016) ‘Flourishing and suffering in social creatures’, in Meconi, David (ed.) On Earth as it is in Heaven: Cultivating a Contemporary Theology of Creation (Grand Rapids MI: Eerdmans), 159–173.Google Scholar
Pawl, Faith (2018) ‘Human Superiority, divine providence, and the animal good: a Thomistic defense of creaturely hierarchy’, in Crisp, Oliver & Sanders, Fred (eds) The Christian Doctrine of Humanity (Grand Rapids MI: Zondervan), 41–60.Google Scholar
Saadia (1948) The Book of Beliefs and Opinions, Rosenblatt, Samuel (tr.) (New Haven: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
Stump, Eleonore (1997) ‘Saadia Gaon on the problem of evil’, Faith and Philosophy, 14, 523–549.10.5840/faithphil199714444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stump, Eleonore (2010) Wandering in Darkness (Oxford: Oxford University Press).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199277421.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stump, Eleonore (2018) Atonement (Oxford: Oxford University Press).10.1093/oso/9780198813866.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stump, Eleonore (2019) ‘The doctrine of the atonement: response to Michael Rea, Trent Dougherty, and Brandon Warmke’, European Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 11, 165–186.10.24204/ejpr.v11i1.2710CrossRefGoogle Scholar