Hostname: page-component-669899f699-chc8l Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-24T13:47:04.518Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Analytic theology and the academic study of religion: response to critics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2024

William Wood*
Affiliation:
Oriel College, Oxford, UK

Abstract

I respond to challenges posed by Andrew Dole, Joanna Leidenhag, Kevin Schilbrack, and Sameer Yadav. Key topics include: whether the engagement between analytic theology and the academic study of religion really is mutually beneficial, distinguishing analytic theology from science-engaged theology, restrictive methodological naturalism, and whether I misconstrue analytic theology’s ‘characteristic damage’.

Type
Book Symposium
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Owen, Matthew (2018) Dusting off dualism? American Philosophical Association Blog. https://blog.apaonline.org/2018/12/03/dusting-off-dualism (accessed 28 July 2024).Google Scholar
Rickbaugh, Brandon and Moreland, JP (2024) The Substance of Consciousness: A Contemporary Defense of Substance Dualism. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Wood, William (2016) Traditions, trajectories, and tools in analytic theology. Journal of Analytic Theology 4, 254266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yadav, Sameer (2020) Toward an analytic theology of liberation. In Panchuk, M and Rea, M (eds), Voices from the Edge: Centering Marginalized Perspectives in Analytic Theology. New York: Oxford University Press, 4774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar