Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T03:43:25.234Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What derivations cannot do

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2015

GRAHAM OPPY
GRAHAM OPPY*
Affiliation:
School of Philosophical, Historical and International Studies, Menzies Building, 20 Chancellor's Walk, Monash University VIC 3800, Australia e-mail: graham.oppy@monash.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I think that there is much about contemporary philosophy of religion that should change. Most importantly, philosophy of religion should be philosophy of religion, not merely philosophy of theism, or philosophy of Christianity, or philosophy of certain denominations of Christianity, or the like. Here, however, I shall complain about one fairly narrow aspect of contemporary philosophy of religion that really irks me: its obsession with derivations that have as their conclusion either the claim that God exists or the claim that God does not exist. I shall work myself up by degrees.

Type
Articles
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 51 , Special Issue 3: Religious Studies at 50 , September 2015 , pp. 323 - 333
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)