Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T03:06:58.516Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The value of nature in Indian (Hindu) traditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 August 2010

CHRISTOPHER G. FRAMARIN
CHRISTOPHER G. FRAMARIN*
Affiliation:
Departments of Philosophy and Religious Studies, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
*
e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Many authors claim that certain Indian (Hindu) texts and traditions deny that nature has intrinsic value. If nature has value at all, it has value only as a means to mokṣa (liberation). This view is implausible as an interpretation of any Indian tradition that accepts the doctrines of ahiṃsā (non-harm) and karma. The proponent must explain the connection between ahiṃsā and merit by citing the connection between ahiṃsā and mokṣa: ahiṃsā is valuable, and therefore produces merit, because ahiṃsā is instrumentally valuable as a means to mokṣa. Ahiṃsā is a means to mokṣa, however, because it produces merit. Hence the explanation is circular. Additionally, this view entails that morality is strictly arbitrary – it might just as well be that hiṃsā (harm) produces merit, and ahiṃsā produces demerit. An alternative interpretation that avoids these problems states that the value of ahiṃsā derives from the intrinsic value of the unharmed entities.

Type
Articles
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 47 , Issue 3 , September 2011 , pp. 285 - 300
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Mahābhārata (1966) in Dandekar, Ramachandra Narayan (ed.) Anuśāsanaparvan (Poona: Bandarkar Oriental Research Institute).Google Scholar
Manusmṛti (1999) in Jhā, Ganganath (ed.) Manusmṛti with the ‘Manubhāṣya’ of Medhātithi, I (Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass).Google Scholar
Callicott, J. Baird (1994) Earth's Insights: A Survey of Ecological Ethics from the Mediterranean Basin to the Australian Outback (Berkeley CA: University of California Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Framarin, Christopher G. (2009) ‘The problem with pretending: Rāmānuja's arguments against Jīvanmukti’, Journal of Indian Philosophy, 37, 399–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, William F. (1951) ‘Ethics and value in Indian philosophy’, Philosophy East and West, 4, 321–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingalls, Daniel H. H. (1957) ‘Dharma and mokṣa’, Philosophy East and West, 7, 41–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lal, Basant K. (1986) ‘Hindu perspectives on the use of animals in science’, in Regan, Tom (ed.) Animals and Sacrifices: Religious Perspectives on the Use of Animals in Science (Philadelphia PA: Temple University Press).Google Scholar
McGee, Mary (2000) ‘State responsibility for environmental management: perspectives from Hindu texts on polity’, in Chapple, Christopher K. & Tucker, Mary E. (eds). Hinduism and Ecology: The Intersection of Earth, Sky, and Water (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
McZenzie, John (1922) Hindu Ethics (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Moore, Charles A. (ed.) (1951) Essays in East–West Philosophy: An Attempt at World Philosophical Synthesis (Honolulu HI: University of Hawaii Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mumme, Patricia. Y. (1998) ‘Models and images for a vaisnava environmental theology: the potential contribution of śrivaiṣṇavism’, in Nelson, Lance E. (ed.). Purifying the Earthly Body of God: Religion and Ecology in Hindu India (Albany NY: State University of New York Press).Google Scholar
Nelson, Lance E. (2000) ‘Reading the Bhagavadgītā from an ecological perspective’, in Chapple, & Tucker, Hinduism and Ecology.Google Scholar
Nelson, Lance E. (1998) ‘The dualism of nondualism: Advaita vedānta and the irrelevance of nature’, in idem Purifying the Earthly Body of God.Google Scholar
Perrett, Roy W. (1993) ‘Moral vegetarianism and the Indian tradition’, in Smart, Ninian & Thakur, Shivesh (eds) Ethical and Political Dilemmas of Modern India (New York NY: St Martin's Press).Google Scholar
Srinivasa, Rao (1996) ‘Two myths in Advaita’, Journal of Indian Philosophy, 24, 265–279.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Hans P. (1968) ‘The origin of Ahiṃsā’, in Melanges d'Indianisme a la memoire de Louis Renou (Paris: E. de Boccard).Google Scholar
Arvind, Sharma (1998) ‘Attitudes to nature in the early Upaniṣads’, in Nelson, Purifying the Earthly Body of God.Google Scholar
Sherma, Rita DasGupta (1998) ‘Sacred immanence: reflections of ecofeminism in Hindu tantra’, in Nelson, Purifying the Earthly Body of God.Google Scholar
Kim, Skoog (1996) ‘Is the Jīvanmukti state possible?’, in Fort, Andrew O. & Mumme, Patricia Y. (eds) Living Liberation in Hindu Thought (Albany NY: State University of New York Press).Google Scholar