Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T02:07:26.075Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Two erotic ideals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 June 2014

FIONA ELLIS
FIONA ELLIS*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Heythrop College, University of London, W8 5HN, UK e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In his article ‘Nietzsche, Tristan, and the rehabilitation of erotic distance’ Joseph D. Kuzma identifies two seemingly opposed erotic ideals in Wagner's Tristan and Isolde. He claims that Nietzsche applauded the first and sought to dispense with the second, and that this was his solution to the problem of nihilism. I argue that this ‘solution’ is as ill-defined as the ideals it involves, and that it either consigns us to hell or offers a terminological variant upon theism. I rescue Schopenhauer from some familiar charges and make a link with Simone Weil's reflections upon love's impossibility.

Type
Articles
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 51 , Issue 1 , March 2015 , pp. 41 - 59
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Augustine, Saint (1961) Confessions , Pine-Coffin, R. S. (tr.) (Harmondsworth: Penguin).Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland (1990) A Lover's Discourse: Fragments, Howard, Richard (tr.) (Harmondsworth: Penguin).Google Scholar
Cooper, David E. (1999) Existentialism (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar
D'Arcy, M. C. (1947) The Mind and Heart of Love: Lion and Unicorn, A Study in Eros and Agape (New York: Henry Holt and Company, Inc.).Google Scholar
De Rougemont, Denis (1956) Love in the Western World, Montgomery Belgion (tr.) (New York: Pantheon Books).Google Scholar
Fraser, Giles (2002) Redeeming Nietzsche (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
Gillespie, M. A. (1984) Hegel, Heidegger, and the Ground of History (Chicago: Chicago University Press).Google Scholar
Kuzma, Joseph D. (2013) ‘Nietzsche, Tristan, and the rehabilitation of erotic distance’, Journal of Nietzsche Studies, 44, 69–89.Google Scholar
Levinas, Emmanuel (1961) Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority, Lingis, Alphonso (tr.) (Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press).Google Scholar
Lucretius (2007) On the Nature of Things, Stallings, A. E. (tr.) (London: Penguin).Google Scholar
Mannion, Gerard (2003) Religion and Morality: The Humble Path to Ethics (Aldershot: Ashgate).Google Scholar
McDade, John (2010) ‘Judgement and purgatory’, unpublished.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich (2005) Thus Spoke Zarathustra, Parkes, Graham (tr.) (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
PippinRobert, B. Robert, B. (2005) ‘The erotic Nietzsche: philosophers without philosophy’, in Bartsch, Shadi & Bartscherer, Thomas (eds) Erotikon: Essays on Eros, Ancient and Modern (Chicago: University of Chicago Press), 172–191.Google Scholar
Salter, W. M. (1911) ‘Schopenhauer's contact with theology’, The Harvard Theological Review, 4, 271–310.Google Scholar
Santner, Eric L. (2005) ‘Was will der Philosoph?’, in Bartsch, Shadi & Bartscherer, Thomas (eds) Erotikon: Essays on Eros, Ancient and Modern (Chicago: University of Chicago Press), 192–195.Google Scholar
Sartre, John-Paul (1958) Being and Nothingness: An Essay on Phenomenological Ontology, Barnes, Hazel E. (tr.) (London: Methuen).Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur (1966) The World as Will and Representation, I−II, Payne, E. F. J., (tr.) (New York: Dover).Google Scholar
Scruton, Roger (1994) Sexual Desire: A Philosophical Investigation (London: Orion Books).Google Scholar
Tolstoy, Leo (1995) Anna Karenina, Maude, Louise & Maude, Aylmer (tr.) (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Weil, Simone (1976) The Notebooks of Simone Weil, II, Wills, Arthur (tr.) (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).Google Scholar
Williams, Rowan (2014) ‘Hell is being alone forever’, The Telegraph, Sunday 13 April (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/religion/6021637/Archbishop-of-Canterbury-Hell-is-being-alone-for-ever.html).Google Scholar