^{page 133 note 1} (London: John Murray, 1921): see especially pp. 29–33.Google Scholar

^{page 134 note 1} (Murray, John, 1901): see especially pp. 150–2.Google Scholar

^{page 135 note 1} Bosanquet, Bernard, The Philosophical Theory of the State, (1st edn) (London: Macmillan, 1899).Google Scholar

^{page 136 note 1} Caird, Edward, Lay Sermons in Balliol College Chapel (Glasgow: Maclehose, 1907).Google Scholar

^{page 136 note 2} The Modern Churchman (Oct. 1941), pp. 251–73.Google Scholar

^{page 136 note 3} It was the late Professor H. A. Hodges who first pointed this out to me.

^{page 137 note 1} Bradley, F. H., Collective Essays, I (London: O.U.P. 1935).Google Scholar

^{page 137 note 2} I owe this example (as I owe much else) to Professor H. H. Price.

^{page 138 note 1} See Bradley's, essay: ‘What is the real Julius Caesar?’ in Essays on Truth and Reality (London: O.U.P. 1914), Pp. 409–27.Google Scholar

^{page 139 note 1} Lay Sermons in Balliol College Chapel (Glasgow: Maclehose, 1907).Google Scholar

^{page 139 note 2} Bosanquet mentions Themistocles' intervention in respect of the use made of the resources of the silver mines at Laureion by the Athenians.

^{page 140 note 1} Talbot, E. S., Memories of Early Life (London: Mowbray, 1st impression 1924), see especially pp. 42–5.Google Scholar

^{page 140 note 2} It may be thought that this was done in the light of Kant's philosophy by Joseph, H. W. B. in his Henrietta Herz Lecture: A comparison of the idealism of Kant with that of Berkeley, in Essays in Ancient and Modern Philosophy (London: O.U.P. 1935).Google Scholar

^{page 141 note 1} Caird's lectures as Professor of Moral Philosophy at Glasgow deeply moved the young Cosmo Gordon Lang in his period as a student there and it was Caird's memory that William Temple in 1934 inscribed his Lectures, GiffordNature, man and God (London: Macmillan).Google Scholar

^{page 141 note 2} (London: O.U.P. 1973.)

^{page 141 note 3} Russell, Bertrand, Philosophical Essays (London: Allen & Unwin).Google Scholar

^{page 141 note 4} Philosophical Studies (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1920).Google Scholar

^{page 142 note 1} (London: Macmillan, 1918.) Professor Broad's, C. D. critical notice of this book in Mind for that year should also be studied.Google Scholar

^{page 142 note 2} Some of the most important of the papers are conveniently available in his collection: In Defence of Freewill (London: Allen & Unwin, 1968)Google Scholar. Attention should also be paid to the papers on this topic of Professor A. E. Taylor, e.g. in his contribution to (Contemporary British Philosophy).

^{page 143 note 1} Campbell's work is certainly exempt from the sort of theological criticism brought against the idealist tradition by Forsyth, P. T. in his powerful may in theodicy, The Juttfcation of God (London: Duckworth, 1916).Google Scholar

^{page 143 note 2} (Glasgow, 1899: 2 vols.) But Cairn for Al his scholarship saw Kant as the morning star (faintly glimmering) of the Hegelian dawn.

^{page 143 note 3} (London: O.U.P. 1926.) Webb was also H. W. B. Joseph's brother-in-law.

^{page 144 note 1} (Paris: Aubier, 1970.)

^{page 144 note 2} (Montreal: McGill-Queen's U.P. 1973.)

^{page 144 note 3} (London: Allen & Unwin, 1940.)