Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T10:13:13.719Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Residual Natural Evil and Anthropic Reasoning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

Murdith McLean
Murdith McLean
Affiliation:
St John's College, The University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada R3T 2M5
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Bad things happen; and not just to bad people, but with apparent indifference to the moral or other qualities of the victims. For the theist who believes that the world is created and governed by an all-powerful and perfectly good God, this is a notorious difficulty. In fact the problem of evil is surely the most persuasive consideration available in favour of atheism.

Type
Articles
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 27 , Issue 2 , June 1991 , pp. 173 - 188
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barrow, John D. and Tipler, Frank J.The Anthropic Cosmological Principle. Oxford: Oxford University Press (1988).Google Scholar
Carr, B. J., and Rees, M. J., ‘The Anthropic Principle and the Structure of the Physical World’, Nature, CCLXXVIII (12 04 1979), 605–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, Brandon. ‘Large Number Coincidences and the Anthropic Principle in Cosmology’. Confrontation of Cosmological Theories with Observational Data. Ed. Longair, M. S.. Dordrecht: D. Reidel (1974), pp. 291–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, P. C. W.The Accidental Universe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (1982).Google Scholar
Davies, P. C. W.God and the New Physics. Harmondsworth: Pelican Books (1983).Google Scholar
Davies, P. C. W.Superforce. London: Unwin Paperbacks (1984).Google Scholar
Dicke, R. H. ‘Dirac's Cosmology and Mach's Principle (Letter to the Editor)’, Nature, CXCII, 4801 (11, 1961), 440–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dicke, R. H. and Peebles, P. H. E. ‘The Big Bang Cosmology – Enigmas and Nostrums’. Confrontation of Cosmological Theories with Observational Data. Ed. Longair, M. S.. Dordrecht: D. Reidel (1974), pp. 283–6.Google Scholar
Gardner, Martin. ‘Wap, Sap, Pap, and Fap’. The New York Review (8 May 1986), 22–5.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian. ‘Coincidences; Mundane and Cosmological’. Origin and Evolution of the Universe: Evidence for Design? Ed. Robinson, John M.. Kingston and Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press (1987), pp. 119–38.Google Scholar
Hawking, Stephen. A Brief History of Time. Toronto and New York: Bantam Books, (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
John, Leslie. ‘Anthropic Principle, World Ensemble, Design’, American Philosophical Quarterly, XIX, 2 (04 1982), 141–51.Google Scholar
Leslie, John. ‘The Scientific Weight of Anthropic and Teleological Principles’. Current Issues in Teleology. Ed. Rescher, N.. Lanham, MD: University Press of America (1986).Google Scholar
Nagel, Thomas. ‘Death’. Moral Problems: a Collection of Philosophical Essays. Ed. Rachels, James, 3rd ed.New York: Harper & Row (1979).Google Scholar
Tony, Rothman. ‘A “What You See Is What You Beget” Theory’. Discover (05, 1987), 90–9.Google Scholar
Simmons, Henry T. ‘Redefining the Cosmos’, Mosaic, XIII, 2 (03/04 1982).Google Scholar
Smart, Ninian. Philosophers and Religious Truth, 3rd ed.London: SCM Press (1969).Google Scholar
Swinburne, Richard. The Existence of God. Oxford: Clarendon Press (1979).Google Scholar
Swinburne, Richard. ‘The Problem of Evil’. Reason and Religion. Ed. Brown, Stuart C.. Cornell University Press (1977).Google Scholar
Tennant, F. R.Philosophical Theology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (1930), II, ch. VII.Google Scholar