No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Rejoinder to Scott
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 May 2005
Abstract
Michael Scott attacks my use of likelihood in assessing two explanations for human religion. He assumes that I rely on likelihood alone. He is attacking a straw man. We have no alternative but to rely on likelihood when the probabilities of two competing hypotheses are identical, as I charitably assumed with respect to the hypotheses I discussed. His other criticisms likewise miss the mark.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © 2005 Cambridge University Press