Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T14:52:50.025Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reading the mind of God (without Hebrew lessons): Alston, shared attention, and mystical experience

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2009

ADAM GREEN
ADAM GREEN*
Affiliation:
Philosophy Dept, Saint Louis University, 3800 Lindell Blvd, St Louis, MO 63108
*
e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Alston's perceptual account of mystical experience fails to show how it is that the sort of predicates that are used to describe God in these experiences could be derived from perception, even though the ascription of matched predicates in the natural order are not derived in the manner Alston has in mind. In contrast, if one looks to research on shared attention between individuals as mediated by mirror neurons, then one can give a perceptual account of mystical experience which draws a tighter connection between what is reported in mystical reports and the most similar reports in the natural order.

Type
Articles
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 45 , Issue 4 , December 2009 , pp. 455 - 470
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alston, William P. (1991) Perceiving God: The Epistemology of Religious Experience (Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Bellugi, Ursula, Lichtenberger, Liz, Jones, Wendy, Lai, Zona, & St George, Marie (2000) ‘The neurocognitive profile of Williams Syndrome: a complex pattern of strengths and weaknesses’, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, Supplement, 7–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brinck, Ingar (2001) ‘Attention and the evolution of intentional communication’, Pragmatics & Cognition, 9, 259–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, John (2005) ‘Joint attention and common knowledge’, in Elian, Naomi, Hoerl, Christoph, McCormack, Teresa, & Roessler, Johannes (eds) Joint Attention: Communication and Other Minds (Oxford: Clarendon Press), 287–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, S. & Johnson, S. C. (2000) ‘Metarepresentation and conceptual change: evidence from Williams syndrome’, in Sperber, D. (ed.) Metarepresentations: A Multidisciplinary Perspective (New York NY: Oxford University Press), 225–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gale, Richard (1994) ‘Why Alston's mystical doxastic practice is subjective’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 54, 869–875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobson, R. Peter (2004) The Cradle of Thought: Exploring the Origins of Thinking (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Hobson, R. Peter (2005) ‘What puts the jointness into joint attention?’, in Elian, Hoerl, McCormack, , & Roessler, Joint Attention, 185–204.Google Scholar
Illingworth, Ronald S. (1980) ‘The development of communication in the first year and the factors which affect it’, in Murry, Thomas & Murry, Joan (eds), Infant Communication: Cry and Early Speec (Houston TX: College-Hill Press), 4–19.Google Scholar
Kosslyn, Stephen M. & Koenig, Olivier (1995) Wet Mind: The New Cognitive Neuroscience (New York NY: The Free Press).Google Scholar
Noe, Alva (2004) Action in Perception (Cambridge MA: MIT Press).Google Scholar
Reddy, Vasudevi (2000) ‘Coyness in early infancy’, Developmental Science, 3, 186–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reddy, Vasudevi (2005) ‘Before the “third element”: understanding attention to self’, in Hoerl, Eilan, McCormack, , & Roessler, (eds) Joint Attention: Communication and Other Minds, 85–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rizzolatti, Giacomo, Fogassi, Leonardo, & Gallese, Vittorio (2006) ‘Mirrors in the mind’, Scientific American, 295, 54–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stamenov, Maxim & Gallese, Vittorio (eds) (2002) Mirror Neurons and the Evolution of Brain and Language (Amsterdam: John Benjamins).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tager-Flusberg, Helen, Skwerer, Daniela Plesa, & Joseph, Robert M. (2006) ‘Model syndromes for investigating social cognitive and affective neuroscience: a comparison of autism and Williams syndrome’, Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 1, 175–182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed