^{page 343 note 1} Hume, David, Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

^{page 343 note 2} The Nature of Necessity (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1974), pp. 196–221.Google Scholar

^{page 343 note 3} The Cosmological Argument (Princeton: University- Press, 1975).Google Scholar

^{page 344 note 1} ‘Ontological Arguments’, Nous, XI (1977), 375–95.Google Scholar

^{page 344 note 2} Ibid. p.377.

^{page 344 note 3} Ibid. p. 378.

^{page 345 note 1} Ibid. p.380.

^{page 345 note 2} Ibid.

^{page 346 note 1} Plantinga, , op. cit. p. 214.Google Scholar

^{page 346 note 2} Ibid.

^{page 346 note 3} Ibid. p. 215.

^{page 346 note 4} Ibid. pp. 219 20.

^{page 346 note 5} Ibid. p. 220.

^{page 346 note 6} Ibid. p. 221.

^{page 349 note 1} Inwagen, Van, op. cit. p. 389.Google Scholar

^{page 349 note 2} This point was brought to my attention by Peter Van Inwagen in correspondence.

^{page 349 note 3} Op. cit. p. 391.Google Scholar

^{page 352 note 1} Rowe, , op. cit. p. 113.Google Scholar

^{page 353 note 1} This example was proposed in correspondence by Peter van Inwagen. The example as presented here contains only minor deviations from his statement of it.

^{page 355 note 1} I am indebted to Ernest Sosa for discussions of this response to the counter-example.

^{page 355 note 2} ‘The Will to Believe’ in Essay in Pragmatism (New York: Halfner, 1948), pp. 88109.Google Scholar

^{page 356 note 1} In addition to the debts previously mentioned, I have benefited from the comments on an earlier version of this paper by Peter van Inwagen, Ernest Sosa and George Pappas and especially from a number of discussions of this topic with Philip Quinn.