Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T16:58:37.372Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Prolegomena to any future non-doxastic religion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2013

ANDREW CHIGNELL
ANDREW CHIGNELL*
Affiliation:
Susan L. Sage School of Philosophy, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I discuss some trends in recent philosophy of religion, focusing on J. L. Schellenberg's Prolegomena to a Philosophy of Religion. I pay special attention to Schellenberg's dual emphases on ‘the Ultimate’ as metaphysical object of inquiry and various non-doxastic states (‘faith that’, ‘faith in’) as psychological objects of inquiry. This view is contrasted throughout to what might be called a ‘liturgical’ orientation in philosophy of religion.

Type
Articles
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 49 , Special Issue 2: Critical Essays on J. L. Schellenberg's Philosophy of Religion , June 2013 , pp. 195 - 207
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, Jonathan (2002) Belief's Own Ethics (Cambridge MA: MIT Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alston, William (1996) ‘Belief, acceptance, and religious faith’, in Howard-Snyder, Daniel & Jordan, Jeff (eds) Faith, Freedom and Rationality (Lanham MD: Rowman and Littlefield Press), 3–27.Google Scholar
Armstrong, David (1973) Belief, Truth, Knowledge (New York: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, David (1998) A World of States of Affairs (New York: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Audi, Robert (1999) ‘Doxastic voluntarism and the ethics of belief’, Facta Philosophica, 1, 87–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braddon-Mitchell, David & Jackson, Frank (eds) (1996) The Philosophy of Mind and Cognition (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Chignell, Andrew (2002) ‘Epistemology for saints: Plantinga's magnum opus’, Books and Culture, online at <http://www.booksandculture.com/articles/2002/marapr/10.20.html>.Google Scholar
Chignell, Andrew (2007) ‘Belief in Kant’, Philosophical Review, 116, 323–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, L. J. (1992) An Essay on Belief and Acceptance (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Diller, Jeanine (2013) ‘The conceptual focus of ultimism: an object of religious concern for the nones and somes’, Religious Studies, doi: 10.1017/S0034412513000097.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginet, Carl (2001) ‘Deciding to Believe’, in Steup, M. (ed.) Knowledge, Truth and Duty (New York: Oxford University Press), 63–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard-Snyder, Daniel (2013) ‘Schellenberg on propositional faith’, Religious Studies, doi: 10.1017/S0034412513000061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, Mark (2009) Saving God (Princeton: Princeton University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montmarquet, James (1986) ‘The voluntariness of belief’, Analysis, 46, 49–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schellenberg, J. L. (2005) Prolegomena to a Philosophy of Religion (Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Weatherson, Brian (2008) ‘Deontology and Descartes' demon’, Journal of Philosophy, 105, 540–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winters, Barbara (1979) ‘Believing at will’, Journal of Philosophy, 76, 243–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar