Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T00:54:24.230Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Problem of Natural Theology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

N. H. G. Robinson
Affiliation:
Professor of Divinity, University of St Andrews

Extract

It is a curious fact that the much maligned ontological argument to prove the existence of God has in recent times enjoyed a revival of interest to which even Karl Barth, the arch-enemy of natural theology has contributed; but since the revival of interest has appared in a wide diversity of intellectual contexts, both philosophical and theological, the revival is itself almost as problematic as the argument itself.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 319 note 1 Flew, A. and MacIntyre, A. (ed.), New Essays in Philosophical Theology (S.C.M. Press, London, 1955), p. 52.Google Scholar

page 320 note 1 Flew, A. and MacIntyre, A. (ed.), New Essays in Philosophical Theology (S.C.M. Press, London, 1955), P. 55.Google Scholar

page 320 note 2 Ibid., p. 60.

page 320 note 3 Caldecott, A. and Mackintosh, H. R., Selections from the Literature of Theism (T. and T. Clark, Edinburgh, 1904), p. 4.Google Scholar

page 321 note 1 Malcolm, N., ‘Anselm's Ontological Arguments’, Philosophical Review, 01, 1960, p. 48.Google Scholar

page 321 note 2 Ibid., p. 50.

page 322 note 1 Malcolm, N., ‘Anselm's Ontological Arguments’, Philosophical Review, 01, 1960, pp. 61 f.Google Scholar

page 322 note 2 Phillips, D. Z., The Concept of Prayer (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1965), p. 19.Google Scholar

page 322 note 3 Cf. ibid., pp. 24, 27, 28.

page 323 note 1 Findlay, J. N., The Transcendence of the Cave (George Allen and Unwin, London, 1967), p. 89.Google Scholar

page 323 note 2 Ibid., p. 81.

page 323 note 3 Ibid., p. 86.

page 323 note 4 Ibid., p. 80.

page 323 note 5 Ibid., p. 81.

page 323 note 6 Ibid., p. 79.

page 324 note 1 Barth, K., Church Dogmatics, II, 1 (T. and T. Clark, Edinburgh, 1957), pp. 304 f.Google Scholar

page 324 note 2 Ibid., II, 1, pp. 92 f.

page 326 note 1 Mascall, E. L., Existence and Analogy (Longmans, Green and Co., London, 1949), p. 80.Google Scholar

page 326 note 2 Ibid., p. 51.

page 326 note 3 Ibid., pp. 50 f.

page 326 note 4 Ibid., p. 80.

page 326 note 5 In New Essays in Philosophical Theology, p. 54.Google Scholar

page 327 note 1 Existence and Analogy, p. 71.Google Scholar

page 327 note 2 Ibid., p. 71.

page 327 note 3 Lewis, H. D., Our Religious Experience (George Allen and Unwin, London, 1959), p. 65.Google Scholar

page 327 note 4 Ibid., P. 42.

page 327 note 5 Ibid., p. 41.

page 327 note 6 Quoted ibid., P. 43.

page 329 note 1 The Problem of Natural Theology in the Thought of Karl Barth’, Religious Studies, 6, p. 125.Google Scholar

page 329 note 2 Ibid., p. 129.

page 330 note 1 Cf. The Problem of Natural Theology in the Thought of Karl Barth’, Religious Studies, 6, p. 133 f.Google Scholar

page 330 note 2 Ibid., p. 133.

page 330 note 2 The Transcendence of the Cave, p. 86.Google Scholar