Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T03:28:10.698Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Philosophy, Theology And The Reading Of Texts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

Vincent Brümmer
Vincent Brümmer
Affiliation:
Faculty of Theology, University of Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 2, 2508 TC Utrecht, Netherlands
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The French composer, Hector Berlioz, reacted as follows to the critics of his opera La Damnation de Faust: ‘I have already recounted how I … wrote the march on the Hungarian theme of Rákóczy in the course of one night. The passionate reception that this march received in Pest made me decide to include it in my Faust, and in doing so I took the liberty to use Hungary as the setting for the opening of the action, and had my hero, deep in reflection, see a Hungarian army passing across the plain. A German critic considered it most remarkable that I should portray Faust in such a manner. I do not see why I should not have done that, and I would, without hesitation, have let him travel to any place whatsoever if it had been to the benefit of the music I was writing. I had not set myself the task of blindly following Goethe's framework, and a character like Faust can be portrayed as making the most outlandish journeys without doing harm in anyway to the credibility of his person. When other German critics … attacked me even more strongly for the departures that my libretto made from the text and the structure of Goethe's Faust, … I wondered why these critics had not reproached me in any way for the libretto of my symphony, Roméo et Juliette, which only shows a slight resemblance to Shakespeare's immortal tragedy! Obviously because Shakespeare was not a German. Chauvinists! Fetishists! Imbeciles!

Type
Articles
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 27 , Issue 4 , December 1991 , pp. 451 - 462
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Freely translated from the programme of the Dutch Opera Company production of Berlioz's opera (Amsterdam, 1989).Google Scholar

2 For these terms, see chapter 5 of my Wijsgerige Begripsanalyse, 3rd revised edn (Kampen, 1989).Google Scholar

3 On this term, see chapter 5 of my Wijsgerige Begripsanalyse.Google Scholar

4 Nineham, Denis, The Use and Abuse of the Bible (London, 1976), p. 29.Google Scholar

5 For a more extended comparison between definition and interpretation, see chapter 5 of my Wijsgerige Begripsanalyse.Google Scholar

6 For a more extended discussion of this claim, see my Theology and Philosophical Inquiry (London, 1981), chapter 4.Google Scholar

7 Hare, R. M., ‘Philosophical discoveries’, in Hare, Essays on Philosophical Method (London, 1971), pp. 19ff.Google Scholar

8 Linge, David E., Introduction to Gadamer's Philosophical Hermeneutics (Berkeley, 1977), p. xxi.Google Scholar

9 Quoted by Wiles, Maurice, The Making of Christian Doctrine (Cambridge, 1967), p. 9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

10 On the cumulative character of religious traditions (and mutatis mutandis, cultural ones as well), see Smith, Wilfred Cantwell, The Meaning and End of Religion (New York, 1962), chapter 6.Google Scholar

11 Gadamer, Hans-Georg, Wahrheit und Methode: Grundzūge einer philosophischen Hermeneutik, Zweite Auflage (Tūbingen, 1965), p. 250.Google Scholar

12 ‘Normbegriffe wie die Meinung des Verfassers oder das Verständnis des urspriünglichen Lesers repräsentieren in Wahrheit nur eine leere Stelle, die sich von Gelegenheit zu Gelegenheit des Verstehens ausfüllt,’ Gadamer, op. tit. p. 373.Google Scholar

13 Staal, J. F., reviewing Gadamer's Wahrheit und Methode, Foundations of Language 3 (1967), 204.Google Scholar

14 Hare, Essays in Philosophical Method, p. 33.Google Scholar

15 Nineham, The Use and Abuse of the Bible, pp. 13–14.Google Scholar

16 Swartley, Willard M., Slavery, Sabbath, War & Women (Scottdale, Penn., 1983), p. 219.Google Scholar

17 Swartley, Slavery, Sabbath, War & Women, p. 220.Google Scholar

18 For a more extensive discussion see my Theology and Philosophical Inquiry, chapter 3.Google Scholar

19 Wittgenstein, Ludwig, Culture and Value (Oxford, 1980), p. 27eGoogle Scholar

20 Wittgenstein, Ludwig, Philosophical Investigations (Oxford, 1958), p. I. 309.Google Scholar

21 Van Orman Quine, Willard, From a Logical Point of View (New York, 1961), pp. 42–3.Google Scholar

22 On ‘conceptual price calculatios’, see my paper on ‘Metaphorical thinking and systematic theolog’, Nederlands Theologisch Tijdschrift 43 (1989), 213 ff.Google Scholar

23 On the flight into descriptivism see Jeffner, Anders, Theology and Integration (Uppsala, 1987), pp. 37–8.Google Scholar See also Jeffner, , Kriterien christlicher Glaubenslehre (Gōttingen, 1977).Google Scholar

24 For the term ‘classical text’, see Tracy, David, The Analogical Imagination, (London, 1981), chapter 3.Google Scholar

25 On the role of metaphors and models in views of life, see my paper on ‘Metaphorical thinking and systematic theology‘. See also my Theology and Philosophical Inquiry, chapters 10–11.