Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T20:11:37.166Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Panmetaphoricism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 October 2015

DANIEL HOWARD-SNYDER
DANIEL HOWARD-SNYDER*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Western Washington University, Bellingham, WA, 98229, USA
*
e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Panmetaphoricism is the view that our speech about God can only be metaphorical. In this article, I do not assess the reasons that have been given for it; rather, I aim to understand what it says and, thereby, to gain a clearer view of the God it offers.

Type
Articles
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 53 , Issue 1 , March 2017 , pp. 25 - 49
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alston, W. P. (1989) Divine Nature and Human Language (Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borg, M. (1997) The God We Never Knew (San Francisco CA: Harper-Collins).Google Scholar
Hick, J. (1989) An Interpretation of Religion (London: Macmillan).Google Scholar
Hick, J. (1995) The Rainbow of Faiths (London: SCM).Google Scholar
Howard-Snyder, F. (1991) ‘ De re modality entails de re vagueness’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 72, 101–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, G. (1975) God the Problem (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Keshgegian, F. (2008) God Reflected: Metaphors for Life (Philadelphia PA: Fortress Press).Google Scholar
McFague, S. (1982) Metaphorical Theology (Philadelphia PA: Fortress Press).Google Scholar
Marek, J. (2013) ‘Alexius Meinong’, in Zalta, E. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2013/entries/meinong/>, accessed 22 September 2015.Google Scholar
Merricks, T. (2001) ‘Varieties of Vagueness’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 62, 145–157.Google Scholar
Rowe, W. L. (1962) ‘The meaning of “God” in Tillich's theology’, The Journal of Religion, 42, 274–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowe, W. L. (1968) Religious Symbolism and God: A Philosophical Study of Paul Tillich's Theology (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Sorenson, R. (2012) ‘Vagueness’, in Zalta, E. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2013/entries/vagueness/>, accessed 22 September 2015.Google Scholar
Tillich, P. (1951) Systematic Theology, I (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Tillich, P. (1952) The Courage To Be (New Haven CT: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
Tillich, P. (1957) Systematic Theology, II (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Tillich, P. (1959) ‘Reply to interpretation and criticism’, in Kegley, C. & Bretall, R. (eds) The Theology of Paul Tillich (New York: Macmillan), 327–349.Google Scholar
van Inwagen, P. (1996) Material Beings (Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
van Woudenberg, R. (1998) ‘Panmetaphoricism examined’, Philosophy and Rhetoric, 31, 231–247.Google Scholar