Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T03:50:46.328Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Morality and Christian Theism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

H. P. Owen
Affiliation:
Emeritus Professor, King's College, University of London

Extract

The relation between morality and religion has often been discussed. However, it is not always recognized that the relation varies greatly according to the variety of religions. I shall here be concerned solely with Christian theism in its traditional form. I take the latter to signify, essentially, belief in a morally perfect Creator who exists in the threefold form of Father, Son and Holy Spirit and who, in the person of the Son, became man in Christ for our salvation. I thus exclude from consideration all non-theistic accounts of God or the Absolute (such as pantheism or process thought). Also I shall consider, not simply bare theism of the kind that Christians share with Jews and Muslims, but also the distinctively Christian form of theism that is generated by distinctively Christian revelation. Many otherwise sound descriptions of the relation between morality and theism are defective because they fail to consider the distinctively Christian contribution to the theistic concept of God and of his relation to the world.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 8 note 1 On the view that the identification of moral daims with God's will is compatible with belief in moral autonomy see further (to give two recent philosophical examples) Ward's, KeithThe Divine Image (London, 1976, pp. 109–12)Google Scholar and Quinn's, P. L.Divine Commands and Moral Requirements (Oxford, 1978, pp. 610).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 13 note 1 Faith and Logic (London, 1957, p. 26).Google Scholar