Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T02:30:03.692Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

John Oman on feeling and theology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2012

ADAM HOOD
ADAM HOOD*
Affiliation:
The Queen's Foundation for Ecumenical Theological Education, Somerset Road, Birmingham, B15 2QH, UK e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article revisits Oman's idea that an intuitive felt knowledge of the divine underlies the articulate knowledge found in faith and theology. Such feeling, Oman claims, is analogous to ordinary perception and gives rise to the attempt to evaluate, understand, and respond to the divine. Theology is the formalized attempt to respond to the intuition of the divine. The article argues that Oman's emphasis on the experiential and experimental character of theology is helpful, but that his analysis of the logic of faith requires reformulation.

Type
Articles
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 49 , Issue 1 , March 2013 , pp. 5 - 18
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baillie, John (1962) The Sense of the Presence of God (London: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Barrett, Justin (2009) ‘Cognitive science, religion, and theology’, in Schloss, Jeffrey and Murray, Michael J. (eds) The Believing Primate: Scientific, Philosophical, and Theological Reflections on the Origin of Religion (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 76–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barth, Karl (1949) Dogmatics in Outline, Thomson, G. T. (tr.) (London: SCM).Google Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah (1980) ‘Does political theory still exist’, in Hardy, Henry (ed.) Concepts and Categories (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 143–172.Google Scholar
Bevans, Stephen (1992) John Oman and his Doctrine of God (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, R. E. D. (1978) ‘Oman, John Wood’, in Douglas, J. D. (ed.) Dictionary of the Christian Church, rev. edn (Grand Rapids: Zondervan), 730.Google Scholar
Drees, Willem B. (2010) Religion and Science in Context (Abingdon: Routledge).Google Scholar
Healey, F. G. (1965) Religion and Reality: The Theology of John Oman (Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd).Google Scholar
Hood, Adam (2003) Baillie, Oman and Macmurray: Experience and Religious Belief (Aldershot: Ashgate).Google Scholar
Hood, Adam (ed.) (2012) John Oman: New Perspectives (Milton Keynes: Paternoster).Google Scholar
Katz, Steven T. (1978) ‘Language, epistemology and mysticism’, in Katz, Steven T. (ed.) Mysticism and Philosophical Analysis (London: Sheldon), 22–74.Google Scholar
Kenny, Anthony (2011) ‘Theology as metaphor’, unpublished lecture given at the British Society for the Philosophy of Religion Conference, Oxford, 14 September 2011.Google Scholar
Livingstone, D. N. (2004) ‘Public spectacle and scientific theory: William Robertson Smith and the reading of evolution in Victorian Scotland’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 35, 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, John (1947) ‘A letter concerning toleration’, in Penniman, Howard R. (ed.) John Locke on Politics and Education (New York: D. Van Nostrand), 21–68.Google Scholar
Lubbock, Tom (2004) ‘Review of Roger Scruton, Death-Devoted Heart: Sex and the Sacred in Wagner's Tristan and Isolde’, Guardian Review Section, 1 May 2004, 15.Google Scholar
Macmurray, John (1957) The Self as Agent (London: Faber).Google Scholar
MacQuarrie, John (1963) Twentieth Century Religious Thought (London: SCM).Google Scholar
Oakeshott, Michael (1991) ‘The voice of poetry in the conversation of mankind’, in Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays, new and expanded edn (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund), 488–541.Google Scholar
Oman, John (1919) Grace and Personality, 2nd edn (London: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Oman, John (1929) ‘Schleiermacher’, Journal of Theological Studies, 30, 401–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oman, John (1931) The Natural and the Supernatural (London: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Oman, John (1941) Honest Religion, Religious Book Club edn (London: Religious Book Club).Google Scholar
Popper, Karl (1994) ‘Knowledge and the shaping of reality’, in In Search of a Better World: Lectures and Essays from Thirty Years, Bennett, Laura (tr.), with additional material by Melitta Mew and rev. Karl Popper and Melitta Mew (London: Routledge), 3–29.Google Scholar
Ruthven, Malise (2004) Fundamentalism: The Search for Meaning (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Schwöbel, Christoph (1992) on the back cover of Bevans (1992).Google Scholar
Smart, Ninian (1993) ‘Models for understanding the relations between religions’, in Kellenberger, J. (ed.) Inter-religious Models and Criteria (London: Macmillan), 58–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tennant, F. R. (1939) ‘John Oman 1860–1939’, Proceedings of the British Academy, 25, 332–338.Google Scholar
Ward, Keith (1994) Religion and Revelation (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Bernard (1995) ‘Ethics’, in Grayling, A. C. (ed.) Philosophy: A Guide Through the Subject (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 545–582.Google Scholar
Wright, William (1965) ‘Appendix I: John Oman as minister’, in Healey (1965), 150–152.Google Scholar