Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T02:31:49.063Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Eternity, knowledge, and freedom

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2012

JOSEPH DIEKEMPER
JOSEPH DIEKEMPER*
Affiliation:
School of Politics, International Studies, and Philosophy, Queen's University Belfast, BT7 1PA, UK e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article addresses the problem of divine foreknowledge and human freedom by developing a modified version of Boethius' solution to the problem – one that is meant to cohere with a dynamic theory of time and a conception of God as temporal. I begin the article by discussing the traditional Boethian solution, and a defence of it due to Kretzmann and Stump. After canvassing a few of the objections to this view, I then go on to offer my own modified Boethian solution, according to which temporal reality is fundamentally dynamic, but truth is not. My claim is that there are eternally existing, tenseless propositions, with determinate truth values, but that these are made true by events that come into existence, and are not themselves eternal.

Type
Articles
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 49 , Issue 1 , March 2013 , pp. 45 - 64
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boethius, (1902) The Consolation of Philosophy, Cooper, W. V. (tr.) (London: J. M. Dent).Google Scholar
Diekemper, J. (2004) ‘Temporal necessity and logical fatalism’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 104, 289–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diekemper, J. (2005) ‘Presentism and ontological symmetry’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 83, 223–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diekemper, J. (2007) ‘B-Theory, fixity, and fatalism’, Noûs, 41, 429–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diekemper, J. (manuscript) ‘The existence of the past’.Google Scholar
McCall, S. (2011) ‘The supervenience of truth: freewill and omniscience’, Analysis, 71, 501–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merricks, T. (2007) Truth and Ontology (New York: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merricks, T. (2009) ‘Truth and freedom’, Philosophical Review, 118, 29–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padgett, A. (1989) ‘God and time: toward a new doctrine of divine timeless eternity’, Religious Studies, 26, 209–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padgett, A. (2002) ‘Divine foreknowledge and the arrow of time: on the impossibility of retrocausation’, in Ganssle, G. & Woodruff, D. (eds) God and Time: Essays on the Divine Nature (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 65–74.Google Scholar
Pike, N. (1982) ‘Divine omniscience and voluntary action’, in Cahn, S. & Shatz, D. (eds) Contemporary Philosophy of Religion (New York: Oxford University Press), 61–76.Google Scholar
Pinnock, C. et al. (1994) The Openness of God (Downers Grove IL: InterVarsity Press).Google Scholar
Rea, M. (2003) ‘Four-dimensionalism’, in Loux, M. & Zimmerman, D. (eds) The Oxford Handbook for Metaphysics (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 246–280.Google Scholar
Rea, M. (2006) ‘Presentism and fatalism’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 84, 511–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stump, E. & Kretzmann, N. (1981) ‘Eternity’, Journal of Philosophy, 78, 429–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tooley, M. (1997) Time, Tense, and Causation (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Tooley, M. (2001) ‘Response to the comments on Time, Tense, and Causation by Storrs McCall, Nathan Oaklander, and Quentin Smith’, in Oaklander, L. N. (ed.) The Importance of Time, Philosophical Studies Series 87 (Dordrecht: Kluwer), 31–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolterstorff, N. (1982) ‘God Everlasting’, in Cahn, S. & Shatz, D. (eds) Contemporary Philosophy of Religion (New York: Oxford University Press), 77–98.Google Scholar
Zagzebski, L. (1991) The Dilemma of Freedom and Foreknowledge (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar