Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T03:27:36.643Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Divine freedom and contingency: an intelligibility problem for (some) theistic compatibilists

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2014

JUSTIN J. DAELEY
JUSTIN J. DAELEY*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of Northwestern – St. Paul, 3003 Snelling Ave. N., St. Paul, Minnesota, 55113-1598, USA e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article argues that the Theistic Compatibilist's typical understanding of what amounts to an intelligible, non-arbitrary free choice undermines God's freedom and the contingency of creation. I further suggest and reject four possible ways for Theistic Compatibilists to respond to this problem in light of their metaphysical commitments to freedom and explanation. I close with discussion of a possible way for Theistic Compatibilists to avoid this problem.

Type
Articles
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 51 , Issue 4 , December 2015 , pp. 563 - 582
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aquinas, T. (1991) Summa Contra Gentiles, Pegis, A. C. (tr.) (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press).Google Scholar
Burrell, D. (2008a) ‘Creator/creatures relation’, Faith and Philosophy, 25, 177–189.Google Scholar
Burrell, D. (2008b) ‘Response to Cross and Hasker’, Faith and Philosophy, 25, 205–212.Google Scholar
Charnock, S. (1996) The Existence and Attributes of God (Grand Rapids: Baker).Google Scholar
Cowan, S. B. (2011) ‘Compatibilism and the sinlessness of the redeemed in heaven’, Faith and Philosophy, 28, 416–431.Google Scholar
Cross, R. (2008) ‘Idolatry and religious language’, Faith and Philosophy, 25, 190–196.Google Scholar
Dolezal, J. E. (2011) God without Parts: Divine Simplicity and the Metaphysics of God's Absoluteness (Eugene: Wipf and Stock Publishers).Google Scholar
Edwards, J. (1957) Freedom of the Will, Ramsey, Paul (ed.) (New Haven: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
Feinberg, J. (1986) ‘God ordains all things’, in Basinger, D. & Basinger, R. (eds) Predestination and Free Will: Four Views on Divine Sovereignty and Human Freedom (Downers Grove: InterVasity Press), 17–44.Google Scholar
Flint, T. P. (1983) ‘The problem of divine freedom’, American Philosophical Quarterly, 20, 255–264.Google Scholar
Frame, J. M. (2002) The Doctrine of God (Phillipsburg: Presbyterian and Reformed).Google Scholar
Garcia, L. (2009) ‘Moral perfection’, in Flint, T. P. & Rea, M. (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Theology (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 217–238.Google Scholar
Grudem, W. (1994) Systematic Theology: An Introduction to Biblical Doctrine (Grand Rapids: Zondervan).Google Scholar
Hasker, W. (2004) Providence, Evil, and the Openness of God (New York: Routledge Press).Google Scholar
Hasker, W. (2008) ‘On behalf of the pagans and idolaters’, Faith and Philosophy, 25, 197–204.Google Scholar
Helm, P. (2010) ‘Reformed thought on freedom: some further thoughts’, Journal of Reformed Theology, 4, 185–207.Google Scholar
Helm, P. (2011a) Eternal God: A Study of God without Time, 2nd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Helm, P. (2011b) ‘Structural indifference and compatibilism in Reformed orthodoxy’, Journal of Reformed Theology, 5, 184–205.Google Scholar
Helseth, P. K. (2011) ‘God causes all things’, in Jowers, D. W. (ed.) Four Views on Divine Providence (Grand Rapids: Zondervan), 25–52.Google Scholar
Howard-Snyder, D. & Howard-Snyder, F. (1994) ‘How an unsurpassable being can create a surpassable world’, Faith and Philosophy, 11, 260–268.Google Scholar
Howard-Snyder, D. & Howard-Snyder, F. (1996) ‘The real problem of no best world’, Faith and Philosophy, 13, 422–425.Google Scholar
Kane, R. (2007) ‘Libertarianism’, in Fischer, J. M., Kane, R., Pereboom, D., & Vargas, M. (eds) Four Views on Free Will (Oxford: Blackwell Publishing), 5–43.Google Scholar
Kane, R. (2011) ‘Introduction: the contours of contemporary free-will debates (part 2)’, in Kane, R. (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Free Will, 2nd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 3–35.Google Scholar
Langtry, B. (2006) ‘God and infinite hierarchy of creatable worlds’, Faith and Philosophy, 23, 460–476.Google Scholar
Langtry, B. (2008) God, the Best, and Evil (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Mann, W. (2009) ‘The metaphysics of divine love’, in Timpe, K. (ed.) Metaphysics and God: Essays in Honor of Eleonore Stump (New York: Routledge), 60–75.Google Scholar
McCann, H. J. (1995) ‘Divine sovereignty and the freedom of the will’, Faith and Philosophy, 12, 582–598.Google Scholar
McCann, H. J. (2012) Creation and the Sovereignty of God (Bloomington: Indian University Press).Google Scholar
Mele, A. R. (2008) Free Will and Luck (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Morris, T. V. (1987) Anselmian Explorations: Essays in Philosophical Theology (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press).Google Scholar
Muller, R. A. (2003) Post-Reformation Reformed Dogmatics: The Rise and Development of Reformed Orthodoxy, ca. 1520 to ca. 1725 (Grand Rapids: Baker).Google Scholar
O'Connor, T. (2012) Theism and Ultimate Explanation: The Necessary Shape of Contingency (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell Press).Google Scholar
Pawl, T. & Timpe, K. (2013) ‘Heavenly freedom: a response to Cowan’, Faith and Philosophy, 30, 188–197.Google Scholar
Pruss, A. R. (2006) The Principle of Sufficient Reason (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Pruss, A. R. (2012) ‘The Leibnizian cosmological argument’, in Craig, W. L. & Moreland, J. P. (eds) The Blackwell Companion to Natural Theology (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell Press), 24–100.Google Scholar
Rogers, K. (2008) Anselm on Freedom (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Ross, J. F. (1980) Philosophical Theology (Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company).Google Scholar
Rowe, W. (2004) Can God be Free? (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Ruben, D. H. (2012) Explaining Explanation, 2nd edn (Boulder: Paradigm Publishers).Google Scholar
Swinburne, R. (1993) The Coherence of Theism, rev. edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Swinburne, R. (2004) The Existence of God, 2nd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Talbott, T. (1988) ‘On the divine nature and the nature of divine freedom’, Faith and Philosophy, 5, 3–24.Google Scholar
Talbott, T. (2009) ‘God, freedom, and human agency’, Faith and Philosophy, 26, 378–397.Google Scholar
Timpe, K. (2008) Free Will: Sourcehood and Its Alternatives (New York: Continuum).Google Scholar
Timpe, K. (2011) ‘An analogical approach to divine freedom’, Proceedings of the Irish Philosophical Society, 88–99.Google Scholar
van Inwagen, P. (2000) ‘Free will remains a mystery’, Philosophical Perspectives, 14, 1–19.Google Scholar
van Inwagen, P. (2006) The Problem of Evil (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Ward, K. (1996) Religion and Creation (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Ware, B. A. (2004a) God's Greater Glory: The Exalted God of Scripture and the Christian Faith (Wheaton: Crossway).Google Scholar
Ware, B. A. (2004b) ‘Robots, royalty, and relationships? Toward a clarified understanding of real human relations with the God who knows and decrees all that is’, Criswell Theological Review, 1, 191–203.Google Scholar
The Westminster Confession of Faith , ‘Of God's eternal decree’, ch. 3, para. I.Google Scholar
Wierenga, E. (2002) ‘The freedom of God’, Faith and Philosophy, 19, 425–436.Google Scholar