Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T02:32:59.448Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Design—A Further Reply to R. G. Swinburne1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

A. Olding
A. Olding
Affiliation:
Senior Lecturer in Philosophy, Macquarie University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
A Reply To
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , June 1973 , pp. 229 - 232
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 229 note 2 This is why we cannot accept Swinburne's suggestion (D2, p. 202) that when the mind acts on the brain the difference it causes lies within the quantum limit.

page 231 note 1 But note that it could be claimed that what the god tried to bring about intentionally, and indirectly, are certain brain states which are directly produced by human agents. Here, as else-where, there is a curious parallel to Berkeley.